BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 651|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 651
          Author:   Hueso (D) et al.
          Amended:  7/11/11 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ELECTIONS & CONSTIT. AMEND. COMM  :  3-2, 06/08/11
          AYES:  Correa, De León, Lieu
          NOES:  La Malfa, Gaines

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  50-24, 04/25/11 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Initiatives:  paid circulators:  registration

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires professional petition firms, 
          as defined, to register with Secretary of State (SOS).  
          Specifies that the failure to register would be punishable 
          by a fine of $10,000, and failure to submit required 
          training or verification materials would be punishable by a 
          fine of $5,000.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 7/11/11 provide that the bill 
          would only ban a person from being involved with petition 
          circulation if they were convicted within the previous 10 
          years for a crime relating to petition circulation.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law:

          1.Requires every state or local initiative petition to 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 651
                                                                Page 
          2

            contain a statement notifying voters of their right to 
            inquire whether the petition is being circulated by a 
            paid signature gatherer or volunteer. 

          2.Establishes a process for proposing initiative measures 
            submitted to voters in California and sets forth 
            qualifications for persons who circulate initiative 
            petitions. 

          3.Provides that a person who is a voter or who is qualified 
            to register to vote in this state may circulate a state 
            initiative or referendum petition anywhere within the 
            state. 

          This bill:

          1.Defines the term, "professional petition firm," as an 
            entity that pays individuals to circulate petitions and 
            gather signatures for the purpose of qualifying an 
            initiative for a state or local election ballot. 

          2.Requires a professional petition firm to register 
            annually with the SOS in order to pay individuals to 
            circulate petitions and collect signatures to qualify an 
            initiative on a state or local election ballot. 

          3.Requires the registration of a professional petition firm 
            to include the full name, address, and partners, owners, 
            or officers of the firm, and to be accompanied by a 
            registration fee established by the SOS.  Specifies that 
            the SOS may seek a civil penalty not exceeding $10,000 
            from a firm that fails to register.

          4.Requires the SOS to use the fee revenue to maintain on 
            its Internet Web site a directory of professional 
            petition firms and to defray any other associated costs 
            with the requirements of this bill. 

          5.Requires a member of a professional petition firm to 
            review the law relating to obtaining petition signatures 
            with each paid petition circulator before a paid petition 
            circulator can obtain any signatures for the firm. 

          6.Requires a copy of the training materials provided to the 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 651
                                                                Page 
          3

            prospective petition firm employees to be submitted by 
            the firm to the SOS.  Requires the firm to submit a 
            statement to the SOS for each circulator, signed by the 
            circulator and the individual conducting the review, that 
            the circulator has received the review. 

          7.Allows the SOS to seek a civil penalty of $5,000 from a 
            firm that fails to submit a statement of verification and 
            training materials to the SOS as required. 

          8.Provides that a person who has been convicted of perjury 
            or other crimes related to the circulation of petitions 
            shall not be permitted to operate a professional petition 
            firm or gather signatures for an initiative petition.  

          9.Provides that a contract for circulating a petition or 
            collecting signatures for a proposed state or local 
            initiative, referendum, or recall measure that is to be 
            submitted to the voters is void if it makes payment to 
            any person under the contract contingent upon the measure 
            being qualified for the ballot.  This bill applies only 
            to a contract entered into after the effective date of 
            this bill.

           Prior Legislation
           
          AB 6 (Saldaña) of 2009, would have required professional 
          petition firms to register with the SOS and pay a 
          registration fee.  AB 6 (Saldaña) was vetoed by Governor 
          Schwarzenegger, who wrote in his veto message, "The people 
          of California often exercise their important role in 
          government oversight through the initiative, referendum and 
          recall process. I cannot support a measure that places an 
          undue burden on reform-minded Californians." 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  7/12/11)

          Secretary of State
          San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council
          The Human Society of the United States
          The Ballot Initiative Strategy Center

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 651
                                                                Page 
          4


           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  7/12/11)

          Capitol Resource Family Impact
          Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association 

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT :   According to the author's office, 
          the initiative process has shifted from what was originally 
          envisioned to be a grassroots effort to a system heavily 
          influenced by special interests that spend large sums of 
          money, using paid signature gatherers, to qualify a measure 
          for the ballot.  The author believes that this bill, by 
          requiring state registration of petition gathering firms, 
          posing this information on the SOS website, and requiring 
          these firms to train their workers regarding relevant state 
          law, will help ensure an open and transparent initiative 
          process. 

          In support of this bill, the SOS argues that it will ensure 
          that professional petition firms appropriately educate 
          their employees about how to comply with the law and will 
          potentially decrease fraudulent or illegal practices in 
          signature gathering. 

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION :   The Capitol Resource Family 
          Impact, in opposition to this bill, argues that the 
          requirement of firms to register with the SOS is an assault 
          to California's direct initiative process. 


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  
          AYES:  Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Block, 
            Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, 
            Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, 
            Chesbro, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, 
            Galgiani, Gatto, Gordon, Hall, Hayashi, Roger Hernández, 
            Hill, Hueso, Huffman, Lara, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, 
            Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, 
            Portantino, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, 
            Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez
          NOES:  Bill Berryhill, Conway, Cook, Donnelly, Fletcher, 
            Garrick, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Harkey, Jeffries, 
            Jones, Knight, Logue, Mansoor, Miller, Morrell, Nestande, 
            Nielsen, Norby, Silva, Smyth, Valadao, Wagner

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 651
                                                                Page 
          5

          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Achadjian, Furutani, Gorell, Huber, 
            Olsen, Vacancy


          DLW:nl  7/12/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****




































                                                           CONTINUED