BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                AB 680
                                                                Page  1

        CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
        AB 680 (Block)
        As Amended  August 25, 2011
        Majority vote
         
         
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |ASSEMBLY: |     |(May 23, 2011)  |SENATE: |32-5 |(August 30, 2011)    |
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
                  (vote not relevant)


         ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
        |COMMITTEE VOTE:  |11-0 |(September 6, 2011) |RECOMMENDATION: |concur    |
        |ED.              |     |                    |                |          |
         ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

        Original Committee Reference:    HIGHER ED. 

        SUMMARY  :  Authorizes a school district or a county office of 
        education (COE), in consultation with law enforcement officials, to 
        choose not to have its schoolsite council develop and write those 
        portions of its comprehensive school safety plan that include 
        tactical responses to criminal incidents that may result in death 
        or serious bodily injury at the schoolsite and authorizes, instead, 
        school district and COE administrators to write those portions of 
        the school safety plan.  

         The Senate amendments  delete the Assembly version of this bill, and 
        instead:

        1)Authorize the portions of a school safety plan that include 
          tactical responses to criminal incidents to be developed by 
          administrators of the school district or COE in consultation with 
          law enforcement officials and with a representative of an 
          exclusive bargaining unit of employees of that school district or 
          COE, if he or she chooses to participate.  

        2)Authorize the school district or COE to elect not to disclose 
          those portions of the comprehensive school safety plan that 
          include tactical responses to criminal incidents.  

        3)Define "tactical responses to criminal incidents" as steps taken 
          to safeguard pupils and staff, to secure the affected school 
          premises, and to apprehend the criminal perpetrator or 








                                                                AB 680
                                                                Page  2

          perpetrators.

        4)Specify that nothing in this bill precludes the governing board 
          of a school district or COE from conferring in a closed session 
          with law enforcement officials pursuant to Government Code 
          Section 54957 to approve a tactical response plan.  Provides that 
          any vote to approve the tactical response plan shall be announced 
          in open session following the closed session.

        5)Specify that nothing in this bill shall be construed to reduce or 
          eliminate the requirements in Education Code Section 32282, which 
          specifies the components required to be included in the school 
          safety plan.  

         AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill established provisions 
        governing the number of members, the election of members, and the 
        reapportionment of trustee areas for the Grossmont-Cuyamaca 
        Community College District governing board.

         FISCAL EFFECT  :  This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative 
        Counsel.

         COMMENTS  :  Existing law requires each school district or COE to be 
        responsible for the development of all comprehensive school safety 
        plans for all the schools in its jurisdiction.  Existing law 
        further identifies a schoolsite council, or a school safety 
        planning committee comprised of specified members, as the entity to 
        develop and write a school safety plan that includes processes, 
        procedures, and policies to ensure student and staff safety at a 
        schoolsite.  Existing law also requires the schoolsite council or 
        school safety planning committee to hold a public meeting at the 
        schoolsite in order to allow members of the public the opportunity 
        to express an opinion about the school safety plan prior to 
        adopting the plan.

        Existing law requires the comprehensive school safety plan to 
          include an assessment of the current status of school crime 
          committed on school campuses and at school-related functions and 
          identification of appropriate strategies and programs that will 
          provide or maintain a high level of school safety and address the 
          school's procedures for complying with existing laws related to 
          school safety, including child abuse reporting procedures; 
          disaster procedures; an earthquake emergency procedure system; 
          policies regarding pupils who commit specified acts that would 
          lead to suspension or expulsion; procedures to notify teachers of 








                                                                AB 680
                                                                Page  3

          dangerous pupils; a discrimination and harassment policy; the 
          provisions of any schoolwide dress code; procedures for safe 
          ingress and egress of pupils, parents, and school employees to 
          and from school; a safe and orderly environment conducive to 
          learning; rules and procedures on school discipline; and, hate 
          crime reporting procedures.

        This bill authorizes a school district or COE to, in consultation 
        with law enforcement officials, choose not to have its schoolsite 
        council develop and write the portions of the comprehensive school 
        safety plan that include tactical responses to criminal incidents 
        that may result in death or serious bodily injury at the 
        schoolsite.  The bill authorizes, but does not require, school 
        district or COE administrators, in consultation with law 
        enforcement officials and with a representative of an exclusive 
        bargaining unit of employees of the school district or COE, to 
        develop the tactical responses to criminal incidents components of 
        the school safety plan.  The bill further authorizes a school 
        district or COE to elect not to disclose the tactical responses to 
        criminal incidents and specifies that nothing precludes the 
        governing board of a school district or COE from approving the 
        tactical response plan in closed session.    

        According to the author, "The requirement for schools to adopt a 
        school safety plan was originally established as a way for 
        districts to plan and respond to emergencies and catastrophes such 
        as earthquakes and fires.  Over the years, given the rise in school 
        violence incidents, the content of safety plans has changed 
        dramatically.  They now encompass sensitive tactical response 
        strategies to deadly attacks.  For instance, school safety plans 
        may now include placard communication codes that assist school 
        staff in quickly communicating with law enforcement SWAT teams.  
        They also include certain exit strategies given the nature of an 
        attack or threat.  In these instances, if the information falls 
        into the hands of the wrong persons, the safety of children staff 
        and visitors is compromised."

        The sponsor, San Diego Unified School District, cites as an 
        example, an incident in 2004 whereby U.S. authorities arrested a 
        man in Iraq with a computer disk containing a public report 
        downloaded from the U.S. Department of Education Web site on crisis 
        planning that included school safety plans developed by the San 
        Diego Unified School District.  While there was no threat as a 
        result of the incident, school and law enforcement officials fear 
        that someone may use information gleaned from the school safety 








                                                                AB 680
                                                                Page  4

        plan to carry out an attack at a schoolsite.     
         
        Current law requires any materials provided to a schoolsite council 
        to be made available to any member of the public who requests the 
        materials pursuant to the California Public Records Act.  By 
        authorizing school districts and COEs to allow administrators 
        rather than schoolsite councils to develop the tactical response 
        plans and by authorizing districts and COEs to not disclose the 
        plans to the public, this bill may keep the information from being 
        subject to the Public Records Act.  The Public Records Act allows 
        an agency to withhold disclosing any record if, on the facts of the 
        particular case, the public interest served by not disclosing the 
        record clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure 
        of the record.  A tactical plan that is adopted in closed session 
        by a governing board is also protected from the Public Records Act. 
         This bill, however, does not require a governing board to adopt 
        the tactical plan.

        The bill does not specify whether nondisclosure of the tactical 
        plans include nondisclosure to schoolsite staff.  The sponsor 
        states that it is presumed that staff will be trained as necessary 
        and appropriate on the contents of the tactical response plan.  
        Language in the bill also clarifies that nothing shall be construed 
        to eliminate or reduce the required components of the school safety 
        plan.  


         Analysis Prepared by  :    Sophia Kwong Kim / ED. / (916) 319-2087 

                                                                 FN: 0002748