BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 708
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 13, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                 AB 708 (Knight) - As Introduced:  February 17, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Public 
          SafetyVote:  7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill adds crimes involving hidden video recordings to the 
          list of offenses for which the statute of limitations does not 
          begin to run until discovery of the offense, specifying that a 
          criminal complaint may be filed within one year of the date of 
          discovery of a hidden recording related to the use of concealed 
          cameras to secretly videotape another, as specified.  

           FISCAL EFFECT

           Unknown, likely minor, non-state-reimbursable local law 
          enforcement costs, offset to a degree by increased fine revenue, 
          to investigate and punish the misdemeanor offenses addressed by 
          this bill. 
           
           COMMENT
           
           1)Rationale.  The author, referencing a recent case in Sacramento 
            County in which a prominent realtor was accused of 
            surreptitiously videotaping persons in his homes in various 
            stages of undress, notes that since many of the accusations 
            were several years old, the statute of limitations had expired 
            and the accused could not be tried on the misdemeanor 
            disorderly conduct offenses of nonconsensual taping.  

            According to the author and proponents (law enforcement), this 
            bill addresses an anomaly in the law that allows that statute 
            of limitations to expire for crimes that are by definition 
            secret and may not surface for years.   

            (The Sacramento criminal case has been settled, with the 








                                                                  AB 708
                                                                  Page  2

            individual pleading to felony eavesdropping related to 
            instances in which he secretly recorded encounters with 
            prostitutes.  Those offenses occurred within the three-year 
            felony statute of limitations. He received a two-year state 
            prison term that was suspended for probation and a one-year 
            county jail term that will likely be served on house arrest. 
            It is unlikely this bill would have altered his sentence as he 
            was convicted of a felony.)

             2)   Current Law  . 

             a)   Makes it a misdemeanor to use a concealed camera to 
               secretly record a person under or through the clothing for 
               the purpose of viewing the body of or undergarments worn by 
               that other person, without the consent or knowledge of that 
               other person, under circumstances in which the other person 
               has a reasonable expectation of privacy.  

             b)   Provides that, unless otherwise specified, prosecution 
               for a misdemeanor shall commence within one year after 
               commission of the offense, and prosecution for a felony 
               shall commence within three years after commission of the 
               offense.
              

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081