BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 764
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  April 4, 2011

                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION
                                Henry T. Perea, Chair

                 AB 764 (Swanson) - As Introduced:  February 17, 2011

          Majority vote.  Fiscal committee.
           
          SUBJECT  :  Personal income taxes:  voluntary contributions:  
          Victim-Witness Assistance Fund

           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes the addition of the Victim-Witness 
          Assistance Fund (Fund) checkoff to the personal income tax (PIT) 
          form upon the removal of another voluntary contribution fund 
          (VCF) from the form.  Specifically,  this bill  provides:

          1)That all moneys transferred to the Fund, upon appropriation by 
            the Legislature, shall be allocated as follows:

             a)   To the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) and the State 
               Controller for reimbursement of all costs incurred in 
               administering the checkoff; and, 

             b)   To community-based organizations that serve minor 
               victims of human trafficking.  Money in the Fund shall be 
               allocated to community-based organizations in accordance 
               with the selection process specified in Penal Code (PC) 
               Section 13837(b).  

          2)For the Fund provisions' automatic repeal on either January 1 
            of the fifth taxable year following the Fund's first 
            appearance on the PIT return or on January 1 of an earlier 
            year, if FTB estimates that the annual contribution amount 
            will be less than $250,000, or an adjusted amount for 
            subsequent years.   

           EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Allows taxpayers to designate on their PIT returns a 
            contribution to any of 15 VCFs.

          2)Provides a specific sunset date for each VCF, except for the 
            California Seniors Special Fund.









                                                                  AB 764
                                                                  Page  2

          3)Provides that each VCF must meet a minimum annual contribution 
            amount to remain in effect, except for the California Seniors 
            Special Fund, the California Firefighters' Memorial Fund, and 
            the California Peace Officer Memorial Foundation Fund.   

           FISCAL EFFECT  : The FTB estimates annual revenue losses of 
          roughly $20,000 resulting from itemized deductions.  

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)The author has provided the following statement in support of 
            this bill:

               Nearly 300,000 American children and youth are estimated to 
               be at risk of child sexual exploitation each year.  There 
               are many organizations throughout the state that help to 
               provide support services to young men and women who have 
               been victimized by sexual exploitation.  This bill will 
               facilitate these important treatment services by providing 
               a funding mechanism to support organizations that serve 
               sexually exploited minors.  AB 764 authorizes individual 
               taxpayers to contribute amounts in excess of their tax 
               liability to the Victim-Witness Assistance Fund to be 
               allocated to community-based organizations that serve minor 
               victims of human trafficking.  

          2)FTB notes the following in its staff analysis of this bill:

               This bill would allow the Legislature to allocate funds 
               directly to nongovernmental entities.  Typically, voluntary 
               contribution funds are allocated to a state agency for 
               purposes of overseeing the expenditure of the funds.  
               Without an allocation to a state agency, the funds could be 
               prevented from reaching community-based organizations that 
               provide sexual assault services programs.  The author may 
               wish to add language that would allocate the funds to a 
               state agency that would be responsible for administering 
               the funds to the community-based organizations. 

          3)Committee Staff Comments:

              a)   The Victim-Witness Assistance Fund  :  Under existing law, 
               moneys appropriated from the Fund are made available to 
               public or private nonprofit agencies to assist criminal 
               witnesses and victims.  To be eligible to receive funds, 








                                                                  AB 764
                                                                  Page  3

               agencies must meet a number of statutory criteria.  Among 
               other things, agencies must provide comprehensive services 
               to victims and witnesses of all types of crime.  In 
               addition, agencies must be recognized and selected by their 
               county board of supervisors.  

              b)   Open Questions  :  This bill provides for the allocation 
               of Fund moneys to community-based organizations that serve 
               minor victims of human trafficking.  Under existing law, 
               however, agencies must serve victims of  all  types of crimes 
               to be eligible to receive Fund monies.  Thus, it is not 
               clear whether the author intends for contributions to be 
               allocated to agencies that provide comprehensive services 
               or to agencies focused exclusively on serving minor victims 
               of human trafficking.  This ambiguity is compounded by 
               provisions stating that Fund moneys shall be allocated to 
               community-based organizations in accordance with the 
               selection process specified in PC Section 13837(b), which 
               appears to govern the California Emergency Management 
               Agency.  To simplify administration of this VCF, Committee 
               staff suggests amendments clarifying that Fund moneys are 
               to be allocated to nonprofit agencies that provide 
               comprehensive services to victims and witnesses of all 
               types of crime, including human trafficking.  

             c)   In the Interest of Full Disclosure  :  Under this bill, 
               the instructions for the PIT form would be amended to 
               include information on the new Fund, and to inform 
               taxpayers that "100 percent of Ýany] contribution shall be 
               used to fund community-based organizations that serve minor 
               victims of human trafficking . . . ."  Technically, this is 
               not accurate.  As with all VCFs, a small percentage of 
               contribution funds are used to reimburse both FTB and the 
               State Controller for their administrative costs.  As such, 
               the author may wish to take amendments removing the 
               reference to a specific percentage.   
              
              d)   So Many Causes, So Little Space  :  There are countless 
               worthy causes that would benefit from the inclusion of a 
               new VCF on the state's income tax returns.  At the same 
               time, space on the return is limited.  Thus, it could be 
               argued that the current system for adding VCFs to the form 
               is subjective and essentially rewards causes that can 
               convince the Legislature to include their fund on the form.









                                                                  AB 764
                                                                  Page  4

              e)   Suggested Amendments  :  Committee staff suggests the 
               following technical amendments to the bill:

               i)     Replace the word "payment" with "payments" on page 
                 2, line 15; and,

               ii)    Provide an explicit mechanism for transferring 
                 taxpayer contributions to the Fund.  Specifically, 
                 Committee staff suggests adding the following language to 
                 proposed Revenue and Taxation Code Section 18809.1:

                    The Franchise Tax Board shall notify the Controller of 
                    both the amount of money paid by taxpayers in excess 
                    of their tax liability and the amount of refund money 
                    that taxpayers have designated pursuant to Section 
                    18809 to be transferred to the Victim-Witness 
                    Assistance Fund.  The Controller shall transfer from 
                    the Personal Income Tax Fund to the Victim-Witness 
                    Assistance Fund an amount not in excess of the sum of 
                    the amounts designated by individuals pursuant to 
                    Section 18809 for payment into that fund.

              f)   Related Legislation  :  The following related bills have 
               been introduced in the current Legislative Session:

               i)     AB 233 (Hall) would add the California YMCA Youth 
                 and Government Fund to the form; 

               ii)    AB 564 (Smyth) would, among other things, add the 
                 Municipal Shelter Spay-Neuter Fund to the form; and, 

               iii)   AB 971 (Monning) would extend the current repeal 
                 date for the California Sea Otter Fund.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          None on file 

           Opposition 
           
          None on file 
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :  M. David Ruff / REV. & TAX. / (916) 








                                                                  AB 764
                                                                  Page  5

          319-2098