BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 852
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 852 (Fong)
          As Amended  May 27, 2011
          Majority vote 

           HIGHER EDUCATION    6-1         APPROPRIATIONS      12-5        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Block, Brownley, Fong,    |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield,     |
          |     |Galgiani, Lara,           |     |Bradford, Charles         |
          |     |Portantino                |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |
          |     |                          |     |Gatto, Hill, Hall, Lara,  |
          |     |                          |     |Mitchell, Solorio         |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Miller                    |Nays:|Harkey, Donnelly,         |
          |     |                          |     |Nielsen, Norby, Wagner    |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Establishes reemployment rights for temporary 
          California Community College (CCC) faculty, based on specified 
          criteria.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Establishes findings and declarations regarding the numbers of 
            temporary faculty, the importance of a stable and 
            knowledgeable workforce, and the importance of a secure pool 
            of part-time faculty.  Finds the intent of this act is to 
            provide CCC with a pool of faculty that has proven to be 
            assets to the CCC and its students.    

          2)Requires, as of July 1, 2012, temporary faculty employed in a 
            CCC for at least four of the preceding eight semesters (or six 
            of the preceding 12 quarters) and whose last evaluation was 
            satisfactory to have the right of first refusal for an 
            assignment in that district which the faculty has performed in 
            the preceding eight semesters (or 12 quarters).  Establishes 
            that in cases where two or more temporary faculty members have 
            the same claim, the assignment shall be offered in order of 
            seniority.

          3)Provides that a temporary faculty member may be denied the 
            right of first refusal for just cause.  Provides that "just 
            cause" includes, but is not limited to, giving the assignment 
            to a more senior faculty member, failure of a faculty member 








                                                                  AB 852
                                                                  Page  2


            to timely request the assignment if required by the district, 
            or the decision not to offer the assignment because of low 
            enrollment, funding, or program changes.

          4)Provides that the right of first refusal granted by this bill 
            shall not be construed as "reasonable assurance" of employment 
            for purposes of unemployment compensation eligibility between 
            academic terms.

          5)Provides temporary faculty an entitlement to any greater 
            rights than those provided in this bill if provided in a 
            collective bargaining agreement or otherwise provided by a 
            district.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, CCC districts that do not have collective bargaining 
          agreements or otherwise provide reemployment rights that meet or 
          exceed the requirements of this bill would incur one-time costs 
          to establish or modify their reemployment procedures, with 
          ongoing costs to implement these procedures. The number of 
          districts and colleges impacted and the associated costs are 
          unknown. These costs would likely be minor for individual 
          districts or colleges, but could be significant statewide and 
          all costs would be state reimbursable. Assuming two-thirds of 
          the 109 colleges are impacted, and, on average, incur ongoing 
          costs of $5,000 starting in 2011-12, statewide General Fund 
          (Proposition 98) costs would be $365,000 annually.

           COMMENTS  :  

           CCC district reemployment policies  :  AB 1245 (Alquist), Chapter 
          850, Statutes of 2001, requires the issue of reappointment 
          rights for temporary faculty be a subject of negotiation during 
          collective bargaining and provided that reappointment rights may 
          be based on whatever factors are agreed to by both parties.  
          Many districts have established reappointment rights policies 
          under existing law.  These policies vary in specifics, and it is 
          unclear how many of these policies are in conflict with the 
          provisions of this bill.  For example, Grossmont-Cuyamaca 
          Community College District's (GCCCD) reemployment policy 
          provides course-specific reemployment preference.  At GCCCD, 
          once a temporary faculty member has taught a course eight times, 
          that individual has the right to be offered that course 
          assignment prior to someone with less preference, no preference, 








                                                                  AB 852
                                                                  Page  3


          or a new hire.  This bill would establish a uniform practice 
          among CCC districts regarding reemployment rights, requiring 
          faculty assignment decisions be based primarily on seniority.
           
          Purpose of this bill  :  According to the author, the growing 
          trend in California is that full-time tenured faculty at CCC are 
          diminishing and being replaced by part-time temporary faculty.  
          California's 43,000 CCC part-time faculty members represent 
          nearly two-thirds of all CCC faculty, teaching 40% of the CCC 
          classes.  Yet, according to the California Federation of 
          Teachers, this temporary workforce is poorly compensated and 
          lacks basic supports and benefits.  The flexibility to negotiate 
          reemployment policies at each CCC district has resulted in 
          unfair and unreliable reemployment practices in some CCC 
          districts.  Additionally, many temporary faculty create 
          full-time teaching schedules through employment in two or more 
          CCC districts.  The various differences in reemployment policies 
          in these CCC districts make it difficult for temporary faculty 
          to plan their upcoming teaching schedules.  By establishing a 
          more uniform reemployment policy, this bill will ensure fair 
          reemployment practices that increase stability for temporary 
          faculty and the students they serve.

           Arguments in opposition  :  The Community College League of 
          California notes that many of California's 72 CCC districts have 
          collective bargaining agreements that include some form of 
          preference rights for temporary faculty, although many differ in 
          specifications, details, process, and how rights are earned.  
          The League argues that mandated terms for right of refusal as 
          specified in this bill could be inconsistent with the number and 
          schedule of courses at each college, which vary depending on 
          programmatic and student educational needs, and fiscal 
          challenges faced by a college district.  The League argues that 
          implications of criteria could be especially difficult for 
          multiple college districts and small rural districts.            
              
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916) 
          319-3960 


                                                                FN: 0000868









                                                                  AB 852
                                                                  Page  4