BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 865
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 27, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                AB 865 (Nestande) - As Introduced:  February 17, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Revenue and 
          Taxation     Vote:                            8-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill extends the "new construction" exclusion for active 
          solar energy systems to improvements constructed through the 
          2032-33 fiscal year.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Provides for an automatic repeal of the exclusion on January 
            1, 2034.

          2)Provides that, notwithstanding Revenue and Taxation Code 
            (R&TC) Section 2229, no appropriation is made by this bill and 
            the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax 
            revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. 

          3)Takes effect immediately as a tax levy.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          The Board of Equalization estimates that this bill may reduce 
          property tax revenues (at the basic 1% property tax rate) by $1 
          million annually, beginning with fiscal year 2016-17.  The 
          estimate also mentions that for any year in which a large-scale 
          solar power project is completed and qualifies for the new 
          construction exclusion, the revenue impact could be 
          substantially more for that particular year.   This would result 
          in increased General Fund expenditures of about $400,000 to back 
          fill a portion of the lost property tax revenues that otherwise 
          would have gone to schools.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  .  The author asserts California has historically been 








                                                                  AB 865
                                                                  Page  2

            a leader in renewable energy development and that Investor 
            Owned Utilities (IOU) currently procure an average of 18% of 
            their energy needs through qualifying renewable energy sources 
            (some municipal owned utilities have a higher percentage).  In 
            order to facilitate the development of renewable facilities, 
            it is important to extend this incentive to provide regulatory 
            certainty when renewable energy developers seek financing.

           2)Support  .  The sponsor of this bill, SunPeak Solar LLC states 
            that by extending the property tax exclusion to January 1, 
            2034 will encourage development of solar renewable energy 
            projects in California.  The sponsor contends that large 
            "solar developments require several years of planning, 
            permitting, development, financing, and construction, and that 
            many of these projects will not be ready prior to January 1, 
            2017, to qualify for this exclusion, which makes it even more 
            difficult to obtain  financing for those projects. 
                
            3)Background  .  Existing law excludes the construction or 
            addition of an active solar energy system from the definition 
            of new construction, which means that a property owner could 
            install an active solar energy system on his/her property and 
            the installation would not trigger a reassessment of the 
            property.  Furthermore, an active solar energy system 
            constructed as part of a new building is also excluded from 
            the definition of newly constructed.  

            The current sunset date of 2016 was originally chosen to 
            coincide with the sunset of the California Solar Initiative, 
            which is part of the California program with a $2.2 billion 
            budget and a goal of installing 1,940 MW by the end of 2016.  
            The existing sunset is not due to expire for another four 
            years, and the California Solar Initiative program will not be 
            re-evaluated until 2016.  
                
            4)Existing Tax Benefits for the Solar Power Industry  .  Both the 
            federal government and the State of California offer numerous 
            incentives for individuals to install solar energy systems, 
            including $2.2 billion of California Solar Initiative rebates, 
            net-metering (where ratepayers sell excess solar electricity 
            back into the grid and pay bills based on net energy usage), 
            accelerated depreciation for commercial purposes under federal 
            law, low-interest loans for solar panels on low-income 
            housing, the possibility of renewable energy credit sales, and 
            time-of-use electricity pricing.  








                                                                  AB 865
                                                                  Page  3


          Furthermore, federal law allows a renewable electricity income 
            tax credit for the production of electricity from qualified 
            energy resources at qualified facilities, including solar 
            energy.  In addition to the renewable electricity production 
            tax credit, a taxpayer is allowed to claim a federal tax 
            credit for the investment in certain property, including fuel 
            cell and solar property.  Finally, new solar energy systems 
            and solar energy systems incorporated into a new building are 
            eligible for the exclusion from under California's property 
            tax laws.

           5)Opposition  .  The California State Association of Counties and 
            the Regional Council of Rural Counties opposes the bill 
            because AB 865 fails to reimburse local agencies for the 
            revenue loss, thereby using county revenue to favor these 
            projects during times of such fiscal stress seems 
            ill-considered at best.  

           6)Relevant legislation  .  AB 15 x1 (Hill), introduced in the 
            current legislative session, would revise the definition of 
            "active solar energy system," and would declare legislative 
            intent to extend the current exclusion from property tax 
            reassessment to specified active solar energy systems.  The 
            bill is pending in the Senate Governance and Finance 
            Committee. 
             
             

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081