BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 873
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 873 (Furutani)
          As Amended  June 20, 2011
          2/3 vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |78-0 |(May 19, 2011)  |SENATE: |39-0 |(August 18,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2011)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:   P.E.,R.& S.S.  

           SUMMARY  :  Strengthens revolving door and lobbying restrictions 
          for board members and high level staff at the California Public 
          Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California State 
          Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS).  Specifically,  this bill  : 
           

          1)Prohibits, for a period of  four years  after leaving that 
            office or position, former members of the CalPERS and CalSTRS 
            boards, senior executives and investment officers, and general 
            counsels, or an information technology or health benefits 
            manager with a career executive assignment designation from 
            accepting compensation as an agent, attorney for, or otherwise 
            represent any person, except the state, by making an 
            appearance before, or communication to, CalPERS or CalSTRS if 
            the purpose of the appearance or communication is to influence 
            an action by the entity.

          2)Prohibits, for a period of two years after leaving that office 
            or position, former members of the CalPERS and CalSTRS boards, 
            senior executives and investment officers, and general 
            counsels, or an information technology or health benefits 
            manager with a career executive assignment designation from 
            accepting compensation to aid, advise, consult with, or assist 
            a business entity in obtaining an award, or in negotiating, a 
            contract or contract amendment with CalPERS or CalSTRS.

          3)Prohibits, for a period of ten years after leaving that office 
            or position, former members of the CalPERS or CalSTRS boards, 
            senior executives and investment officers, and general counsel 
            from accepting compensation as a placement agent in connection 
            with investments or other business of CalPERS or CalSTRS.

          4)Makes these actions a violation of the Political Reform Act of 








                                                                  AB 873
                                                                  Page  2

            1974 (PRA), subject to administrative, civil, and criminal 
            penalties.

          5)Declares the intent of the Legislature to further the purposes 
            of the PRA.

           The Senate amendments  narrowed the applicability of the 
          provisions relating to working on projects tied to a former 
          employer by prohibiting the person from aiding, advising or 
          consulting with, for compensation a business entity in obtaining 
          contracts with the retirement systems.  The amendments also 
          revised the definition of "business entity" for purposes of the 
          bill.  
           
           EXISTING STATE LAW  :

          1)Prohibits individuals serving in senior investment and key 
            executive positions of the Public Employees Retirement System 
            or the State Teachers Retirement System from influencing the 
            actions of their respective retirement boards or retirement 
            systems on behalf of any person, other than the state, within 
            two years after leaving that position.
           
          2)Restricts, under the Political Reform Act, former employees 
            and board members from being paid to appear before or 
            communicate with their former agency to influence the agency's 
            actions for a period of one year following the end of their 
            employment or term.  The Political Reform Act also prohibits 
            state officials from making, participating in, or influencing 
            government decisions directly relating to a prospective 
            employer with whom they are negotiating employment or after 
            they have reached an employment arrangement.

          3)Prohibits, under the Public Contract Code, a covered former 
            state official from entering into a contract for which he or 
            she engaged in any of the negotiations, transactions, 
            planning, arrangements, or any part of the decision-making 
            process while in state service-for a two-year period after 
            separation.  For a one-year period after separation, a covered 
            former state official may not enter into a contract with the 
            former agency if he or she was in a policy-making position in 
            that agency in the same general subject area as the proposed 
            contract.

          4)Requires placement agents who wish to do business with CalPERS 








                                                                  AB 873
                                                                  Page  3

            or CalSTRS to register as lobbyists and be subject to all 
            related reporting and compliance requirements under the 
            Political Reform Act that apply to lobbyists.

          5)Makes a violation of the PRA subject to administrative, civil, 
            and criminal penalties.

           EXISTING FEDERAL LAW  :

          1)Sets a one year ban or cooling-off period, with regard to such 
            activities as lobbying, for "senior employees" and a two year 
            ban for "very senior employees," as well as a permanent ban on 
            "switching sides" for executive branch employees who worked on 
            a matter involving contracts, grants or lawsuits, while a 
            federal employee.

          2)Prohibits, generally, employees from accepting employment with 
            an entity with which they have had substantial contract 
            dealings (valued above $10 million) in the one year following 
            their separation.

          AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY,  this bill was substantially similar 
          to the version approved by the Senate.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations 
          Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.

           COMMENTS  :  The following information was provided to the 
          Committee by the sponsor of the bill, the State Controller's 
          Office:

               In early 2009 a public pension fund scandal involving 
               the trade of campaign contributions for pension fund 
               investments broke in New York State.  The individuals 
               at the center of that scandal were investment 
               middlemen, called placement agents, and some of those 
               involved were linked to placement agent firms in 
               California.  

               In the months that followed the scandal rippled 
               westward, catching former CalPERS board members and a 
               chief executive who had received tens of millions of 
               dollars for arranging investment deals that, in some 
               cases, lost the state hundreds of millions of dollars.  









                                                                  AB 873
                                                                  Page  4


               In 2010 there were two related developments to address 
               the unfolding placement agent scandal.  

               First, early that year the Controller's Office, 
               CalPERS, and Treasurer's Office sponsored legislation, 
               AB 1743 (Hernández), Chapter 668, Statutes of 2010, 
               requiring placement agents who wanted to do business 
               with CalPERS and the CalSTRS to register as lobbyists.  
               Under this new law placement agents are subject to all 
               existing limits on lobbyists, including annual filing 
               requirements and limits on gifts to board members.

               Second, CalPERS commissioned a study by the respected 
               Washington DC law firm Steptoe and Johnson to review 
               CalPERS' investment decision making and identify 
               ethical vulnerabilities.  The initial findings of that 
               report, which included a recommendation to further 
               limit the "revolving door" of employment, between 
               pension fund investment work and private firms seeking 
               those investments, was released in November 2010.  In 
               March 2011 a more detailed description of the incidents 
               leading to Steptoe and Johnson's recommendations was 
               issued, explaining the role prospective employment 
               played in recommendations about investment decisions at 
               CalPERS.  

               This measure is modeled on current federal 
               post-employment restrictions and would not prevent 
               separating employees from working for any employer with 
               whom CalPERS or CalSTRS does business, as long as their 
               duties did not involve performing, implementing, or 
               executing a contract with CalPERS or CalSTRS.  
               As noted in the Steptoe report, Mr. Buenrostro (former 
               Chief Executive Officer at CalPERS) and Mr. Villalobos 
               (former board member) were still lobbying CalPERS five 
               years after they left.  A longer ban should, on a 
               going-forward basis, effectively (and importantly) 
               sever the relationship between CalPERS and CalSTRS and 
               placement agents.

               This proposal addresses a key ethical issue associated 
               with former CalPERS board members and staff tied to the 
               placement agent scandal.  By enacting stronger 
               revolving door and lobbying restrictions CalPERS and 








                                                                  AB 873
                                                                  Page  5

               CalSTRS investments will be better insulated from undue 
               influence, restoring the systems' performance and 
               credibility in the public eye, while reducing the 
               likelihood that investment decisions would be 
               influenced by job offers and former employees' 
               "insider" knowledge.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Karon Green / P.E., R. & S.S. / (916) 
          319-3957 



                                                                FN: 0002020