BILL NUMBER: AB 880	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN SENATE  MARCH 22, 2012
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  MAY 10, 2011
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  MARCH 25, 2011

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly  Member   V. Manuel
Pérez   Members   Nestande   and V.
Manuel Pérez 

                        FEBRUARY 17, 2011

   An act to  amend Sections 21159 and 21159.1 of the Public
Resources Code    add Section 1587 to the Fish and Game
Code  , relating to  the environmental quality 
 ecological reserves  .



	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 880, as amended,  V. Manuel Pérez  
Nestande  .  Environmental quality: CEQA: expedited
environmental review.   Ecological reserves: Mirage
Trail.  
   Existing law authorizes the Department of Fish and Game, with the
approval of the Fish and Game Commission, to, among other things,
maintain, use, and administer land suitable for the purpose of
establishing ecological reserves. Existing law authorizes the
Department of Fish and Game to construct facilities and conduct
programs in ecological reserves to provide natural history education
and recreation if those facilities and programs are compatible with
the protection of the biological resources of the reserve.  

   This bill would require the department to open the Mirage Trail
within the Magnesia Spring Ecological Reserve to hiking and biking
recreational activities.  
   The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead
agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify
the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project
that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant
effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it
finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA authorizes the
use of a focused environmental impact report for a project that
consists solely of the installation of pollution control equipment or
for a project that consists solely of the installation of that
equipment or other components in compliance with the California
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.  
   Existing law requires specified state and local government
agencies to perform a specified environmental analysis at the time of
the adoption of a rule or regulation requiring the installation of
pollution control equipment, or a performance standard or treatment
requirement, including a rule or regulation that requires the
installation of pollution control equipment or a performance standard
or treatment requirement pursuant to the California Global Warming
Solutions Act of 2006.  
   This bill would instead require that those agencies perform an
environmental analysis of the reasonably foreseeable methods of
compliance at the time of the adoption of a rule or regulation
requiring the installation of pollution control equipment, or
compliance with a performance standard or treatment requirement,
including a rule or regulation that requires the installation of
pollution control equipment or other direct emission reduction, or
compliance with a performance standard or treatment requirement
adopted pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of
2006.  
   This bill would also revise the circumstances under which a
focused environmental impact report may be used for a project.

   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

   SECTION 1.    Section 1587 is added to the  
Fish and Game Code  , to read:  
   1587.  The department shall open the Mirage Trail within the
Magnesia Spring Ecological Reserve to hiking and biking recreational
activities.  
  SECTION 1.    Section 21159 of the Public
Resources Code is amended to read:
   21159.  (a) An agency listed in Section 21159.4 shall perform an
environmental analysis of the reasonably foreseeable methods of
compliance at the time of the adoption of a rule or regulation
requiring the installation of pollution control equipment, or
compliance with a performance standard, or treatment requirement,
including a rule or regulation that requires the installation of
pollution control equipment or other direct emission reduction, or
compliance with a performance standard or treatment requirement
adopted pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of
2006 (Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) of the Health and
Safety Code). In the preparation of this analysis, the agency may
utilize numerical ranges or averages where specific data is not
available; however, the agency shall not be required to engage in
speculation or conjecture. The environmental analysis shall, at
minimum, include all of the following:
   (1) An analysis of the reasonably foreseeable environmental
impacts of the methods of compliance.
   (2) An analysis of reasonably foreseeable feasible mitigation
measures.
   (3) An analysis of reasonably foreseeable alternative means of
compliance with the rule or regulation.
   (4) For a rule or regulation adopted pursuant to the California
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Division 25.5 (commencing with
Section 38500) of the Health and Safety Code) that requires the
installation of pollution control equipment or other direct emission
reduction, the analysis shall also include reasonably foreseeable
greenhouse gas emission impacts of compliance with the rule or
regulation.
   (b) The preparation of an environmental impact report at the time
of adopting a rule or regulation pursuant to this division shall be
deemed to satisfy the requirements of this section.
   (c) The environmental analysis shall take into account a
reasonable range of environmental, economic, and technical factors,
population and geographic areas, and specific sites.
   (d) This section does not require the agency to conduct a
project-level analysis.
   (e) For purposes of this article, the term "performance standard"
includes process or raw material changes or product reformulation.
   (f) This section is not intended, and may not be used, to delay
the adoption of any rule or regulation for which an analysis is
required to be performed pursuant to this section.  

  SEC. 2.    Section 21159.1 of the Public Resources
Code is amended to read:
   21159.1.  (a) A focused environmental impact report may be
utilized if a project meets all of the following requirements:
   (1) The project consists solely of any of the following:
   (A) Installation of pollution control equipment required by a rule
or regulation adopted by an agency listed in subdivision (a) of
Section 21159.4 and the other components necessary to complete the
installation of that equipment.
   (B) Installation of pollution control equipment and other
components necessary to complete the installation of that equipment
that reduces greenhouse gases, as required by a rule or regulation
adopted by an agency listed in Section 21159.4 pursuant to the
California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Division 25.5
(commencing with Section 38500) of the Health and Safety Code).
   (C)  Installation of direct emission reduction required by a rule
or regulation adopted by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to
the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Division 25.5
(commencing with Section 38500) of the Health and Safety Code).
   (2) The agency certifies an environmental impact report on the
rule or regulation or reviews it pursuant to a certified regulatory
program, and, in either case, the review includes an assessment of
growth inducing impacts and cumulative impacts of, and alternatives
to, the project.
   (3) The environmental review required by paragraph (2) is
completed within five years of certification of the focused
environmental impact report.
   (4) An environmental impact report is not required pursuant to
Section 21166.
   (b) The discussion of significant effects on the environment in
the focused environmental impact report shall be limited to
project-specific potentially significant effects on the environment
of the project that were not discussed in the environmental analysis
of the rule or regulation required pursuant to subdivision (a) of
Section 21159. A discussion of growth-inducing impacts or cumulative
impacts shall not be required in the focused environmental impact
report, and the discussion of alternatives shall be limited to a
discussion of alternative means of compliance, if any, with the rule
or regulation.