BILL ANALYSIS Ó
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 890|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 890
Author: Olsen (R) and Perea (D), et al.
Amended: 8/24/12 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE : 6-1, 7/2/12
AYES: Simitian, Strickland, Blakeslee, Hancock, Lowenthal,
Pavley
NOES: Kehoe
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 54-9, 1/26/12 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT : Environment: CEQA exemption: roadways
improvement
SOURCE : Tuolumne County
DIGEST : This bill exempts from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) repair, maintenance, and
minor alterations of existing roadways, provided the
project is carried out by a city or county with a
population less than 100,000 persons to improve public
safety, does not cross a waterway, and involves negligible
or no expansion of an existing use, as specified. The
roadway is not a state roadway and the site of the project
does not contain wetlands or riparian areas and does not
have significant value as a wildlife habitat, and the
project does not harm any species protected under federal
CONTINUED
AB 890
Page
2
laws and that and the project does not cause the
destruction or removal of any species protected by a local
ordinance, the project does not impact resources, the
project does not affect scenic resources. Before a project
is determined to be exempt, the land agency has to (1)
include measures in the project to mitigate potential
vehicular traffic and safety impacts and bicycle and
pedestrian safety impacts, and (2) hold a noticed public
hearing on the project to hear and respond to public
comments. The exemption sunsets January 1, 2016.
Senate Floor Amendments of 8/24/12 (1) define "roadway" and
"waterway;" (2) add certain conditions (e.g., project site
cannot contain wetlands or riparian areas; roadway not
state highway); and (3) require a noticed project public
hearing. The opposition has been removed according to the
author's office.
ANALYSIS : Existing law requires lead agencies with the
principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a
proposed project to prepare a negative declaration,
mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact
report (EIR) for this action, unless the project is exempt
from CEQA (CEQA includes various statutory exemptions, as
well as categorical exemptions in the CEQA guidelines).
Comments
CEQA provides a process for evaluating the environmental
effects of applicable projects undertaken or approved by
public agencies. If a project is not exempt from CEQA, an
initial study is prepared to determine whether the project
may have a significant effect on the environment. If the
initial study shows that there would not be a significant
effect on the environment, the lead agency must prepare a
negative declaration. If the initial study shows that the
project may have a significant effect on the environment,
the lead agency must prepare an EIR.
Generally, an EIR must accurately describe the proposed
project, identify and analyze each significant
environmental impact expected to result from the proposed
project, identify mitigation measures to reduce those
impacts to the extent feasible, and evaluate a range of
CONTINUED
AB 890
Page
3
reasonable alternatives to the proposed project. Prior to
approving any project that has received environmental
review, an agency must make certain findings. If mitigation
measures are required or incorporated into a project, the
agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring program to
ensure compliance with those measures.
According to the author, "In recent years, CEQA has slowed
or halted many public and private projects. It is
important to understand the environmental impacts of a
public works project, but to slow or halt a public roadway
project that improves public safety is illogical. Cities
and counties need to be able to quickly perform some public
works projects. Public safety must be the number one
priority of the state, and CEQA has hindered cities and
counties from performing their basic duty?..AB 890
streamlines the process for minor roadway improvements for
cities and counties to improve road safety."
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No
Local: No
SUPPORT : (Verified 8/24/12)
Tuolumne County (source)
Associated Builders and Contractors of California
Associated General Contractors
Association of California Cities - Orange County
California Chamber of Commerce
California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance
California State Association of Counties
California State Council of Laborers
Cities of Kingsburg, Martinez, and Ventura
County of Tulare
Fresno Council of Governments
Greater Bakersfield Chamber Commerce
Kern Council of Governments
League of Cities
Madera County
Madera County Board of Supervisors
Orange County Business Council
Palm Desert Area Chamber of Commerce
Region 9 American Society of Civil Engineers
Regional Council of Rural Counties
CONTINUED
AB 890
Page
4
Southwest California Legislative Council
Southwest Riverside County Legislative Council
Stanislaus County
Transportation Agency for Monterey County
Tulare County Board of Supervisors
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the Tuolumne County
Board of Supervisors in supporting and sponsoring this
bill, "These studies and mitigation seem to be taking
longer periods of time and higher costs to complete. The
result is a reduction in financial resources available to
make public safety improvements to existing roadways." The
board notes that it "has advocated for a change in the law
that regains a proper perspective as to CEQA compliance
costs relative to the actual disturbance of the physical
environment within already established right of ways."
The California Chamber of Commerce supports this bill and
writes, "AB 890 (Olsen) as a JOB CREATOR by encouraging job
growth through the reduction of time and cost associated
roadway improvements. This legislation is consistent with
the goals of our 2012 RENEW AGENDA and will help position
California for economic recovery. AB 890 would exempt
improvements within an existing roadway from the CEQA
process. AB 890 would allow local governments to fix and
maintain roadways in a timely manner ensuring the safety of
drivers and ease of goods movement. Allowing necessary
improvements to be completed without delay will create
certainty for businesses and developers involved in the
projects as well as provide for more efficient goods
movement."
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 54-9, 1/26/12
AYES: Achadjian, Beall, Bill Berryhill, Block, Bonilla,
Bradford, Buchanan, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter,
Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Dickinson, Donnelly,
Fletcher, Fuentes, Beth Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Grove,
Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Roger Hernández, Huber,
Hueso, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Lara, Logue, Ma, Mansoor,
Mendoza, Miller, Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Norby,
Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Portantino, Silva,
Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Valadao, Wagner, John A. Pérez
NOES: Allen, Ammiano, Blumenfield, Feuer, Gatto, Hill,
CONTINUED
AB 890
Page
5
Huffman, Monning, Yamada
NO VOTE RECORDED: Alejo, Atkins, Brownley, Butler, Davis,
Eng, Fong, Furutani, Gordon, Gorell, Halderman, Bonnie
Lowenthal, Mitchell, Skinner, Smyth, Wieckowski, Williams
DLW:d 8/24/12 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****
CONTINUED