BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 931
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 11, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                  AB 931 (Dickinson) - As Amended:  April 15, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Natural 
          ResourcesVote:9-0
                        Housing and Community Development     7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          Increases the maximum retail use, from 15% to 25%, in the 
          definition of "residential" for purposes of an existing 
          California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption for infill 
          housing projects meeting specified criteria.

           FISCAL EFFECT  
          1)Negligible state costs.

          2)Potential minor savings of an unknown amount to the extent 
            state agencies are lead agencies that otherwise would have had 
            to complete environmental impact reports for projects exempted 
            from CEQA by this bill.


           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  .  The author contends that infill residential 
            projects often include a mix of residential and commercial 
            uses and that developments that contain no more than 
            one-quarter retail use should still be considered residential 
            for CEQA purposes.

           2)Background.   CEQA obligates public officials to consider the 
            environmental effects of their decisions.  The lead agency 
            that proposes to approve a project must conduct an initial 
            study to determine if the project may have significant, 
            adverse environmental effects.  If not, the lead agency issues 
            a negative declaration and, after a 30-day review period, 
            proceeds with its review and decision.  If the lead agency 








                                                                  AB 931
                                                                  Page  2

            finds minor effects that can be mitigated, it issues a 
            mitigated negative declaration and then proceeds.  If the lead 
            agency finds that the effects of the project may be 
            significant, it prepares an environmental impact report (EIR), 
            a document that shows public officials how to avoid or 
            mitigate the project's environmental effects.  

            Preparing the EIR begins when the lead agency sends notice of 
            preparation to other public agencies, soliciting advice on the 
            EIR's scope.  If the project is of statewide, regional, or 
            area-wide significance, the lead agency holds a scoping 
            meeting with the other agencies.  The lead agency circulates 
            its draft EIR and invites public comments during a 45-day 
            review period. 

            After this public review, the lead agency issues a final EIR 
            that responds to the comments that it received.  After 
            certifying the final EIR, the lead agency allows the project 
            to proceed.

            SB 1925 (Sher, Chapter 1039, Statutes of 2002) exempts from 
            CEQA specified residential housing projects which meet 
            criteria established to ensure the project does not have a 
            significant effect on the environment.  Those exemptions 
            include certain urban infill housing projects in which retail 
            uses do not exceed 15% of the total floor area.

           3)There is no support or opposition registered for or against 
            this bill.
           
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081