BILL NUMBER: AB 934	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  MARCH 29, 2011
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  MARCH 10, 2011

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Feuer

                        FEBRUARY 18, 2011

   An act to amend Section 47 of the Civil Code, relating to
privileged communications.


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 934, as amended, Feuer. Privileged communications.
   Existing law provides that libel is a false and unprivileged
written publication that injures the reputation, and that slander is
a false and unprivileged publication, orally uttered, that injures
the reputation, as specified. Existing law makes certain publications
and communications privileged, and therefore protected from the
threat of civil action, including communications made in a
legislative proceeding, judicial proceeding, or other proceedings
authorized by law, except as specified.
   This bill would identify specified communications that are not
made privileged under those provisions, including communications
authorized, or made unlawful, by certain provisions of state law
relating to real property transactions, or by local 
ordinances   laws  regarding the regulation of
rents, termination of tenancy, eviction, or harassment of residential
tenants, or discrimination against residential tenants.
   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no.
State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  SECTION 1.  Section 47 of the Civil Code is amended to read:
   47.  A privileged publication or broadcast is one made:
   (a) In the proper discharge of an official duty.
   (b) In any (1) legislative proceeding, (2) judicial proceeding,
(3) in any other official proceeding authorized by law, or (4) in the
initiation or course of any other proceeding authorized by law and
reviewable pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 1084) of
Title 1 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, except as follows:
   (1) An allegation or averment contained in any pleading or
affidavit filed in an action for marital dissolution or legal
separation made of or concerning a person by or against whom no
affirmative relief is prayed in the action shall not be a privileged
publication or broadcast as to the person making the allegation or
averment within the meaning of this section unless the pleading is
verified or affidavit sworn to, and is made without malice, by one
having reasonable and probable cause for believing the truth of the
allegation or averment and unless the allegation or averment is
material and relevant to the issues in the action.
   (2) This subdivision does not make privileged any communication
made in furtherance of an act of intentional destruction or
alteration of physical evidence undertaken for the purpose of
depriving a party to litigation of the use of that evidence, whether
or not the content of the communication is the subject of a
subsequent publication or broadcast which is privileged pursuant to
this section. As used in this paragraph, "physical evidence" means
evidence specified in Section 250 of the Evidence Code or evidence
that is property of any type specified in Chapter 14 (commencing with
Section 2031.010) of Title 4 of Part 4 of the Code of Civil
Procedure.
   (3) This subdivision does not make privileged any communication
made in a judicial proceeding knowingly concealing the existence of
an insurance policy or policies.
   (4) A recorded lis pendens is not a privileged publication unless
it identifies an action previously filed with a court of competent
jurisdiction which affects the title or right of possession of real
property, as authorized or required by law.
   (5) This subdivision does not make privileged any communication
made pursuant to or authorized by Section 827, 1946, 1946.1, 1946.5,
or 1951.3 of this code, or by Sections 1161, 1161a, and 1161b of the
Code of Civil Procedure.  However, an allegation or averment
contained in a pleading or affidavit filed in an action for unlawful
detainer shall be privileged as to a subsequent cause of action for
defamation, as defined in Section 44. 
   (6) This subdivision does not make privileged any communication
made unlawful by any provision of Part 2 (commencing with Section 43)
of Division 1 or Title 5 (commencing with Section 1925) of Part 4 of
Division 3 of this code, or Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1159)
of Title 3 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or Part 2.8
(commencing with Section 12900) of Division 3 of Title 2 of the
Government Code, or by a local  ordinance   law
 regarding the regulation of rents, termination of tenancy,
eviction, or harassment of residential tenants, or discrimination
against residential tenants.  However, an allegation or averment
contained in a pleading or affidavit filed in an action for unlawful
detainer shall be privileged as to a subsequent cause of action for
defamation, as defined in Section 44. 
   (c) In a communication, without malice, to a person interested
therein, (1) by one who is also interested, or (2) by one who stands
in such a relation to the person interested as to afford a reasonable
ground for supposing the motive for the communication to be
innocent, or (3) who is requested by the person interested to give
the information. This subdivision applies to and includes a
communication concerning the job performance or qualifications of an
applicant for employment, based upon credible evidence, made without
malice, by a current or former employer of the applicant to, and upon
request of, one whom the employer reasonably believes is a
prospective employer of the applicant. This subdivision authorizes a
current or former employer, or the employer's agent, to answer
whether or not the employer would rehire a current or former
employee. This subdivision shall not apply to a communication
concerning the speech or activities of an applicant for employment if
the speech or activities are constitutionally protected, or
otherwise protected by Section 527.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure
or any other provision of law.
   (d) (1) By a fair and true report in, or a communication to, a
public journal, of (A) a judicial, (B) legislative, or (C) other
public official proceeding, or (D) of anything said in the course
thereof, or (E) of a verified charge or complaint made by any person
to a public official, upon which complaint a warrant has been issued.

   (2) Nothing in paragraph (1) shall make privileged any
communication to a public journal that does any of the following:
   (A) Violates Rule 5-120 of the State Bar Rules of Professional
Conduct.
   (B) Breaches a court order.
   (C) Violates any requirement of confidentiality imposed by law.
   (e) By a fair and true report of (1) the proceedings of a public
meeting, if the meeting was lawfully convened for a lawful purpose
and open to the public, or (2) the publication of the matter
complained of was for the public benefit.
   (f) In enacting paragraphs (5) and (6) of subdivision (b), it is
the intent of the Legislature to invalidate the holdings in Action
Apartment  Ass'n v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd. 
 Assn., Inc. v. City of Santa Monica  (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1232
and Feldman v. 1100 Park Lane Associates (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th
1467.