BILL ANALYSIS Ó ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1112| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: AB 1112 Author: Huffman (D), et al. Amended: 9/2/11 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE NATURAL RES. AND WATER COMMITTEE : 6-3, 6/28/11 AYES: Pavley, Evans, Kehoe, Padilla, Simitian, Wolk NOES: La Malfa, Cannella, Fuller SENATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE : 5-1, 7/6/11 AYES: Simitian, Hancock, Kehoe, Lowenthal, Pavley NOES: Strickland NO VOTE RECORDED: Blakeslee SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 5-2, 8/15/11 AYES: Kehoe, Alquist, Lieu, Pavley, Steinberg NOES: Walters, Emmerson NO VOTE RECORDED: Price, Runner SENATE FLOOR : 17-14, 8/30/11 (FAIL) AYES: Alquist, Calderon, Corbett, De León, DeSaulnier, Evans, Hancock, Hernandez, Kehoe, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Lowenthal, Pavley, Simitian, Steinberg, Wolk NOES: Anderson, Berryhill, Cannella, Correa, Dutton, Emmerson, Fuller, Gaines, Huff, La Malfa, Strickland, Walters, Wright, Wyland NO VOTE RECORDED: Blakeslee, Harman, Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Price, Rubio, Runner, Vargas, Yee ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 42-26, 6/3/11 - See last page for vote CONTINUED AB 1112 Page 2 SUBJECT : Oil spill prevention and administration fee: State Lands Commission SOURCE : Pacific Environment San Francisco BayKeeper DIGEST : This bill authorizes the Office of Spill Prevention and Response to raise the maximum per barrel assessment fee from $0.05 to $0.065 beginning Jan 2012, then reduce the fee back to $0.05 effective Jan 1, 2015. Senate Floor Amendments of 9/2/11 (1) sunset the bunkering and lightering inspection at anchorage and alongside docks in 2014, (2) raise the maximum per barrel fee to $0.065 in 2012, (3) sunset the increase in the maximum per barrel fee increase in 2015, and (4) remove the ability of the Oil Spill Response and Prevention Administrator (Administrator) to adjust the maximum fee annually for inflation. Senate Floor Amendments of 9/1/11 raise the maximum per barrel fee temporarily for three years, and remove authorization for adjustment of the maximum fee annually for inflation. ANALYSIS : Existing law: 1. Requires Office of Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) to direct prevention, removal, abatement, response, containment, and cleanup efforts with regard to all aspects of an oil spill in the marine waters of the state. 2. Requires OSPR to adopt and implement regulations that govern the adequacy of oil spill contingency plans and provide for the best achievable protection of coastal and marine resources. These regulations are required to include, among other things, rules regarding the transfer of oil between vessels (i.e. bunkering and lightering). OSPR is allowed to conduct vessel inspections for the purposes of determining compliance with oil spill prevention and response laws. AB 1112 Page 3 3. Requires the State Lands Commission (Commission) to adopt rules, regulations, guidelines, and leasing policies related to all existing and proposed marine terminals in the state to minimize the possibilities of a discharge of oil. These rules, regulations, guidelines, and leasing policies must provide the best achievable protection of public health and safety and the environment. 4. Requires the Commission to inspect, on a regular basis, all marine facilities along with associated equipment. The Commission is also required to monitor marine facility operations and the effect they have on public health and safety and the environment. 5. Establishes the Oil Spill Prevention and Administration Fund (OSPAF), which finances OSPR and the Commission's oil spill prevention programs. OSPAF is supported by a fee not to exceed $0.05 imposed on each barrel of crude oil or petroleum products received at a marine terminal and a $2,500 fee imposed on nontank vessels every two years. 6. Requires offshore oil drilling facilities under the Commission's jurisdiction to conform to various pollution prevention regulations. This bill: 1. Requires OSPR to develop a risk-based monitoring program for fuel transfers to ships docked or at anchor in state waters. 2. Requires OSPR to screen vessels for potential risks during fueling operations and then to monitor high-risk fueling operations. 3. Authorizes (but does not require) OSPR to raise the maximum per-barrel fee to $0.0650 in 2012 and reduces the fee back to $0.05 in 2015. 4. Authorizes OSPR to increase the maximum fee in the future by the rate of inflation. AB 1112 Page 4 5. Prohibits the loan of monies in the OSPAF to any other fund. 6. Requires OSPR and the Commission to contract with the Department of Finance for audits of the program by 2013 and at least every four years thereafter. 7. Requires the Commission to prepare a report on safety issues surrounding offshore oil drilling by March 1, 2012. 8. Requires the Commission to address several topics in the report, including preventative measures, response plans, and other issues. 9. Sunsets the entire section on bunkering and lightering inspection on December 31, 2014. 10.Raises, temporarily, the maximum per barrel assessment fee from $0.05 to $0.065 beginning Jan 2012 until January 1, 2015. 11.Removes the ability of the Administrator to adjust the maximum per barrel fee for inflation annually. Background The Department of Fish and Game's (DFG) OSPR was created in 1990 by the Lempert-Keene-Seastrand Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act (Act) (commencing with Section 8670.1 of the Government Code ÝGOV]). The Act establishes the position of the Administrator to direct activities relating to oil spill prevention and response including drills and preparedness and oil spill containment and clean up (GOV Section 8670.5). GOV Section 8670.38 creates the OSPAF which funds the OSPR's prevention and response activities as well as oil spill prevention programs at the State Lands Commission, Coastal Commission, and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. It also funds the Oiled Wildlife Care Network's training and field collection, and search and rescue activities. OSPAF is financed through AB 1112 Page 5 (1) a $0.05 maximum assessment on each barrel of crude oil or petroleum products brought into the state (GOV Section 8670.40), and (2) a $2500 maximum fee imposed on nontank vessels biennially (GOV Section 8670.41). The Administrator is required, among other things, to conduct regular inspections of the vessels engaged in bunkering (an operation where one vessel loads another vessel with fuel and lubricants) and lightering (transfer of the oil as cargo from one vessel to another) to evaluate their compliance with existing OSPR laws. Section 8670.42 of GOV requires DFG to contract with the Department of Finance to prepare and submit a report on the financial basis and programmatic effectiveness of OSPR in oil spill prevention and response to the Governor and the Legislature, on or before January 1, 2005. The Commission is responsible for oil and gas and mineral leases (commencing with Section 6801 of the Public Resources Code). This includes jurisdiction over the offshore oil drilling facilities. The Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources within Department of Conservation also has extensive and broad authority to regulate activities associated with the production and removal oil and gas (Public Resources Code Section 3106). FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Fund Monitoring fuel transfers $3,000 $2,000Special * Auditing Up to $100 every four yearsSpecial * Potential additional fee ($3,700) ($7,400) ($7,400) Special * revenues AB 1112 Page 6 * Oil Spill Prevention and Administration Fund. SUPPORT : (Verified 9/6/11) Pacific Environment (co-source) San Francisco BayKeeper (co-source) Blue Frontier Campaign California Association of Professional Scientists California Coast Keeper Alliance California Coastal Commission California State Lands Commission California Statewide Law Enforcement Association Center for Biological Diversity Center for Oceanic Awareness, Research, and Education City of Monterey Clean Water Action Crab Boat Owners Association Defenders of Wildlife East Bay Bird Advocates Environment California Environmental Action Committee Environmental Defense Center Friends of the Earth Greenpeace Natural Resources Defense Council Ocean Champions Ocean Conservancy Ocean Conservation Research Ocean Defenders Alliance Ocean Revolution Oceana Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman's Associations Professional Engineers in California Government Save Our Shores Save The Bay Sierra Club California Surfrider Foundation, Marin County Chapter Turtle Island Restoration Network United Anglers Waterways Restoration Institute ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author's office, this bill will ensure adequate funding for the OSPAF and AB 1112 Page 7 increase oversight of vessels conducting oil transfers. Regarding the fee portion of this bill the author states, "A June 3, 2011 fund condition statement of the OSPAF from the Department of Fish & Game shows the fund being deficient $9 million in 2011-12 and $17 million in 2012-13. This statement is based on an assumption that FY 11-12 and beyond funding is at previous levels (i.e., no furloughs and no other program reductions). Without an increase in the fees or a new funding source, the projected deficits in OSPAF will force both SLC and OSPR to cut positions essential to their respective programs. For fiscal year 2011-12, the estimated deficit is approximately 17% of the cost to operate the programs funded by OSPAF. As such, the author is concerned that OSPR and SLC will likely have to cut 17% of their payroll, which could mean the loss of oil spill prevention specialists, environmental scientists, enforcement agents, engineers, field inspectors, and support staff. Since the deficit is estimated to continue after 2011-12, additional cuts will be required. These cuts will seriously jeopardize the protection SLC and OSPR's programs provide to the public and the environment from oil spills." Regarding the oil transfer provisions of this bill the author states, "AB 1112 will better ensure Californians that oil transfer units have the equipment and trained personnel on site and ready to respond in the event of a spill during an oil-transfer operation by requiring OSPR to develop and implement a screening mechanism and comprehensive risk based monitoring program for the inspection of bunkering and lightering operations at anchorage and alongside that pose the highest risk of a pollution incident." ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 42-26, 6/3/11 AYES: Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Campos, Cedillo, Chesbro, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Gatto, Gordon, Hayashi, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Portantino, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez AB 1112 Page 8 NOES: Achadjian, Bill Berryhill, Conway, Cook, Donnelly, Fletcher, Beth Gaines, Garrick, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Harkey, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Logue, Mansoor, Miller, Morrell, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Silva, Smyth, Valadao, Wagner NO VOTE RECORDED: Alejo, Bonilla, Charles Calderon, Carter, Gorell, Hall, Roger Hernández, Lara, Nestande, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Torres CTW:kc 9/6/11 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END ****