BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1143
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 4, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

               AB 1143 (Dickinson) - As Introduced:  February 18, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Business and 
          Professions  Vote:                            9-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill:

          1)Authorizes the Director of General Services (DGS), with the 
            consent of the State Board of Equalization (BOE), to enter 
            into a lease, a lease-purchase agreement, or a lease with an 
            option to purchase for a build-to-suit facility to consolidate 
            the offices of the BOE within the Sacramento region.

          2)Requires DGS to notify the Legislature of the terms of the 
            agreement at least 30 days prior to executing an agreement, 
            and requires DGS to be reimbursed for its costs associated 
            with this transaction.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)The BOE estimates one-time moving costs of about $1.5 million. 
             Increased annual lease costs for the BOE-assuming 750,000 
            usable square feet of consolidated space-would depend on the 
            specific terms of the new lease agreement, but are estimated 
            to be about $6 million to $14 million annually at current 
            leasing rates. These additional costs would be partially 
            offset by operating efficiencies due to BOE consolidation into 
            a low- or mid-rise structure in lieu of occupying a high-rise 
            building and several satellite locations. These costs would 
            likely not begin before 2015.

          2)Assuming a state agency or agencies are identified to backfill 
            the current BOE headquarters building, these agencies would 
            incur similar one-time moving costs plus one-time costs of up 
            to several million dollars depending on the extent of required 








                                                                  AB 1143
                                                                  Page  2

            tenant improvements. The net ongoing lease cost for these 
            agencies would depend on the occupancy cost of their current 
            space when compared to the BOE building annual costs, which 
            currently total $12.8 million annually-consisting of $8.1 
            million on bond debt service and $4.7 million in base rent.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Background  . The BOE headquarters building at 450 N Street in 
            Sacramento is owned by the state and managed by DGS. 
            Construction of this building began in 1991 and was completed 
            in January 1993. Since that time, the building has required 
            costly repairs for mold remediation and water intrusion 
            problems. The building is designed to house 2,200 employees, 
            while BOE requires space for approximately 2,900 employees. 
            Recent staffing increases at the board are due largely to 
            growth related to legislative mandates for revenue collection 
            and enforcement efforts. With this growth, BOE has located 
            approximately one-fourth of its headquarters operations to 
            four annex sites in the greater Sacramento area. However, BOE 
            states that all of its facilities are at maximum capacity, 
            leaving no room for future growth, which could result in 
            programmatic delays if unaddressed.

           2)Prior Legislation  . AB 151 (Jones) of 2009, which have required 
            DGS to study whether it is in the state's best interests to 
            sell or lease the Sacramento property used for BOE offices, 
            and authorized BOE to independently lease its facilities, was 
            vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger, who argued that the state's 
            fiscal condition precluded such a relocation for the 
            foreseeable future. The governor also argued that the bill 
            would have removed Administration oversight from BOE's real 
            estate transactions.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081