BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1194
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 1194 (Block)
          As Amended August 18, 2011
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |78-0 |(May 19, 2011)  |SENATE: |38-0 |(August 30,    |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2011)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    HEALTH  

           SUMMARY  :  Makes a number of changes to the Calderon-Sher Safe 
          Drinking Water Act to conform it to federal law.

           The Senate amendments  make technical, nonsubstantive changes.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill was substantially similar 
          to the bill as passed by the Senate.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations 
          Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, as a state with federally 
          delegated authority (referred to as a primacy state), 
          California's laws and regulations must conform to the federal 
          Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and be no less stringent than 
          federal safe drinking water regulations.  Should California's 
          laws or regulations fail to conform with the federal laws and 
          regulations, California could lose state primacy, which would 
          result in the loss of up to $132 million annually from the 
          federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).  The author 
          states that EPA could reduce or withhold the Department of 
          Public Health's (DPH's) funding for implementing a drinking 
          water primacy program and for public water system infrastructure 
          improvements, which would hinder systems' ability to provide 
          safe drinking water.  The author further states that a loss of 
          funding would hinder DPH's ability to carry out its regulatory 
          activities through the Drinking Water Program (DWP).

          The EPA delegates its authority to California to implement a 
          drinking water program, which is administered by DPH.  To retain 
          this authority, California's statute and regulations related to 
          drinking water must conform to and be no less stringent than the 
          federal SDWA and federal regulations.  








                                                                  AB 1194
                                                                  Page  2


          According to the DWP, two Field Operations Branches (FOBs) are 
          responsible for the enforcement of the federal and California 
          SDWAs and the regulatory oversight of approximately 7,500 public 
          water systems to assure the delivery of safe drinking water to 
          all Californians.  The FOBs perform field inspections, issue 
          operating permits, review plans and specifications for new 
          facilities, take enforcement actions for non-compliance with 
          laws and regulations, review water quality monitoring results, 
          and support and promote water system security.  In addition, FOB 
          staff are involved in funding infrastructure improvements, 
          conducting source water assessments,  evaluating projects 
          utilizing recycled treated wastewater, and promoting and 
          assisting public water systems in drought preparation and water 
          conservation.  FOB staff work with the federal EPA, the State 
          Water Resources Control Board, Regional Water Quality Control 
          Boards, and other parties interested in the protection of 
          drinking water supplies.  On the local level, FOB staff work 
          with county health departments, planning departments, and boards 
          of supervisors.  Primacy has been delegated by DPH to certain 
          county health departments for regulatory oversight of small 
          water systems, and FOB staff provide oversight, technical 
          assistance, and training for the local primacy agency personnel. 


           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Melanie Moreno / HEALTH / (916) 
          319-2097 

          FN: 0002079