BILL NUMBER: AB 1217	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  APRIL 26, 2011
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  APRIL 14, 2011

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Fuentes

                        FEBRUARY 18, 2011

   An act to amend Section 7613 of, and to add  Section 7542
  Sections 7542 and 7613.5  to, the Family Code,
relating to assisted reproductive technology.


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 1217, as amended, Fuentes. Assisted reproductive technology:
parentage.
   Under existing law, the child of a wife cohabiting with her
husband is conclusively presumed to be a child of the marriage, as
provided, but authorizes the presumed father to bring a motion for
blood tests within 2 years of the child's birth for the purpose of
rebutting that presumption.
   This bill would additionally prohibit the legal spouse of a woman
who gives birth to a child by means of assisted reproduction from
challenging the parentage of the child unless he or she brings the
action within 2 years of learning of the child's birth and the court
finds that he or she did not consent to assisted reproduction. The
bill would also authorize a proceeding to adjudicate parentage at any
time if the court determines that legal spouse did not provide
gametes for, or before or after the birth of the child did not
consent to, assisted reproduction by the individual who gives birth,
the legal spouse and the parent of the child have not cohabited since
the probable time of assisted reproduction, and the legal spouse
never openly held out the child as his or her own.
   The Uniform Parentage Act provides that if, under the supervision
of a licensed physician and surgeon and with the consent of her
husband, a wife is inseminated artificially with semen donated by a
man not her husband, the husband is treated in law as if he were the
natural father of a child thereby conceived. The act further provides
that the donor of semen provided to a licensed physician and surgeon
or to a licensed sperm bank for use in artificial insemination or in
vitro fertilization of a woman other than the donor's wife is
treated in law as if he were not the natural father of a child
thereby conceived.
   This bill would provide that  , notwithstanding those
provisions, an individual who provides gametes for, or consents to,
assisted reproduction by a woman, and who intends at the time gametes
or consent is provided, to be a parent of her child is a parent of
the resulting child if the woman also intended, at the relevant time,
that the individual would be a parent   if agreed to in
a writing signed by the donor and the woman prior to the conception
of the child, the donor would be presumed to be the natural father of
the child  . 
   The bill would also specify that if, under the supervision of a
licensed physician and surgeon and with the consent of her spouse, a
woman undergoes in vitro fertilization with eggs donated by a person
other than her spouse, the spouse is treated in law as if that spouse
were the natural parent of a child thereby conceived, unless
otherwise agreed to in writing prior to the conception of the child.
The bill would also provide that the donor of eggs provided to a
licensed physician and surgeon for use in the in vitro fertilization
of a woman other than the donor's spouse is treated in law as if she
were not the natural parent of a child thereby conceived, unless
otherwise agreed to in writing prior to the conception of the child.
The bill would additionally specify that if, under the supervision of
a licensed physician and surgeon, a woman undergoes in vitro
fertilization using donated eggs on behalf of an intended parent or
parents and the woman agrees in writing prior to the conception of
the child, then that woman is treated in law as if she were not the
natural parent of a child thereby conceived, and the intended parent
or parents are presumed to be the child's natural parent or parents.

   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee:  yes
  no  . State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  SECTION 1.  Section 7542 is added to the Family Code, to read:
   7542.  (a) Notwithstanding Section 7540, the legal spouse of a
woman who gives birth to a child by means of assisted reproduction
may not challenge the parentage of the child unless both of the
following apply:
   (1) Within two years after learning of the birth of the child a
proceeding is commenced to adjudicate parentage.
   (2) The court finds that the legal spouse did not consent to
assisted reproduction, before or after the birth of the child.
   (b) A proceeding to adjudicate parentage may be maintained at any
time if the court determines all of the following:
   (1) The legal spouse did not provide gametes for, or before or
after the birth of the child did not consent to, assisted
reproduction by the individual who gives birth.
   (2) The legal spouse and the parent of the child have not
cohabited since the probable time of assisted reproduction.
   (3) The legal spouse never openly held out the child as his or her
own.
   (c) The limitation provided in this section shall apply to a
marriage declared invalid after assisted reproduction.
  SEC. 2.  Section 7613 of the Family Code is amended to read:
   7613.  (a) If, under the supervision of a licensed physician and
surgeon and with the consent of her husband, a wife is inseminated
artificially with semen donated by a man not her husband, the husband
is treated in law as if he were the natural father of a child
thereby conceived. The husband's consent must be in writing and
signed by him and his wife. The physician and surgeon shall certify
their signatures and the date of the insemination, and retain the
husband's consent as part of the medical record, where it shall be
kept confidential and in a sealed file. However, the physician and
surgeon's failure to do so does not affect the father and child
relationship. All papers and records pertaining to the insemination,
whether part of the permanent record of a court or of a file held by
the supervising physician and surgeon or elsewhere, are subject to
inspection only upon an order of the court for good cause shown.
   (b)  Except as provided in subdivision (c), the 
 The  donor of semen provided to a licensed physician and
surgeon or to a licensed sperm bank for use in artificial
insemination or in vitro fertilization of a woman other than the
donor's wife is treated in law as if he were not the natural father
of a child thereby conceived  , unless otherwise agreed to in a
writing signed by the donor and the woman prior to the conception of
the child, in which case the donor is presumed to be the natural
father of the child  . 
   (c) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or (b), an individual who
provides gametes for, or consents to, assisted reproduction by a
woman, and who intends at the time gametes or consent are provided,
to be a parent of her child is a parent of the resulting child if the
woman also intended, at the relevant time, that the individual would
be a parent. 
  SEC. 3.    Section 7613.5 is added to the  
Family Code   , to read:  
   7613.5.  (a) If, under the supervision of a licensed physician and
surgeon and with the consent of her spouse, a woman undergoes in
vitro fertilization using donated eggs from a person other than her
spouse, that spouse is treated in law as if that spouse were the
natural parent of a child thereby conceived. The spouse's consent
must be in writing and signed by both the woman and her spouse. The
physician and surgeon shall certify their signatures and the date of
the in vitro fertilization, and retain the spouse's consent as part
of the medical record, where it shall be kept confidential and in a
sealed file. However, the physician and surgeon's failure to do so
does not affect the parent-child relationship. All papers and records
pertaining to the in vitro fertilization, whether part of the
permanent record of a court or of a file held by the supervising
physician and surgeon or elsewhere, are subject to inspection only
upon an order of the court for good cause shown.
   (b) The donor of eggs provided to a licensed physician and surgeon
for use in the in vitro fertilization of a woman other than the
donor's spouse is treated in law as if she were not the natural
parent of a child thereby conceived, unless otherwise agreed to in a
writing signed by the donor and the woman prior to the conception of
the child, in which case the donor is presumed to be the natural
parent of the child.
   (c) If, under the supervision of a licensed physician and surgeon,
a woman undergoes in vitro fertilization using donated eggs on
behalf of intended parent or parents and the woman agrees in a
writing signed by the woman and the intended parent or parents prior
to the conception of the child, then the woman is treated in law as
if she were not the natural parent of the child and the intended
parent or parents are presumed to be the child's natural parent or
parents.