BILL ANALYSIS Ó
AB 1293
Page 1
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
AB 1293 (Blumenfield)
As Amended June 28, 2011
Majority vote
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: |76-0 |(May 31, 2011) |SENATE: |34-0 |(August 22, |
| | | | | |2011) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Original Committee Reference: AGING & L.T.C.
SUMMARY : Creates an exception, allowing assets to be frozen
after just one instance of theft or embezzlement from an elder
or dependent adult. Specifically this bill :
1)Authorizes the prosecuting agency in conjunction with a
criminal proceeding alleging theft or embezzlement of property
worth $100,000 or more, to file a petition of forfeiture, as
prescribed, with the superior court of the county in which the
defendant has been charged with elder or dependent financial
abuse, and alleging that the defendant has acquired the
property or proceeds through theft or embezzlement of an elder
or dependent adult's property.
2)Defines "prosecuting agency" as the Attorney General or the
district attorney of any county for purposes of this act.
The Senate amendments
1)Delete the original contents of the bill which amended the
Welfare and Institutions Codes and recasts the author's intent
by amending the Penal Code.
2)Clarify the procedures for petitioning courts to freeze
assets.
EXISTING LAW specifies that the defendant needs repeat instances
of embezzlement or fraud in order to allow their assets to be
frozen.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill added and amended various
sections of the Welfare and Institutions Code known as the
"Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Abuse Protection Act
(EADACPA)."
AB 1293
Page 2
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, costs associated with this legislation would be minor
and absorbable.
COMMENTS : According to the author, this measure will prevent
predators from using ill-gotten gains for their defense. It
will protect a victim's assets by allowing the courts to freeze
the stolen assets when warranted. Upon conviction, a separate
court action would determine the disposition of the frozen
property or funds.
Analysis Prepared by : Robert MacLaughlin / AGING / (916)
319-3990
FN: 0002021