BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1303
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 18, 2011

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                  AB 1303 (Williams) - As Amended:  April 25, 2011 

          Policy Committee:                              Natural 
          ResourcesVote:6-3
                        Utilities and Commerce                10-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill extends, from January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2020, 
          authorization for the California Energy Commission (CEC) to 
          spend funds collected for energy research, development and 
          demonstration pursuant to its Public Interest Energy Research 
          Program (PIER) and renewable energy pursuant to its Renewable 
          Energy Program (REP).

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          This bill authorizes CEC to spend funds for certain programs, 
          but it does not extend the public goods charge that, currently, 
          provides funding for those programs.  Therefore, the fiscal 
          effect of this bill is unknown.  Were CEC to continue to fund 
          its PIER and REP programs at current levels, it would spend at 
          least $62.5 million a year on REP and $65.5 million a year on 
          PIER. 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale.   The author contends it important that CEC continue 
            to fund the state's programs for energy research and renewable 
            energy.  

          2)Background.   When California partially deregulated its energy 
            market in 1996, many assumed the state's for-profit 
            investor-owned utilities (IOUs), seeking to reduce costs, 
            would cut research and other efforts that provide public 
            benefits. To ensure continuation of energy research and other 
            efforts that benefitted the public, statute directed the IOUs 








                                                                  AB 1303
                                                                  Page  2

            to levy a public goods charge on electricity bills to annually 
            fund energy efficiency ($228 million), renewable energy ($65.5 
            million), and energy research, development and demonstration 
            ($62.5 million).  The public goods charge was authorized for 
            10 years and is set to expire at the beginning of 2012.  
            Statute also directs the state's municipally owned utilities 
            to charge their customers a public goods charge for the same 
            purposes and in an amount proportional to revenues.  
                 
            3)Related Legislation.    
                
             a)   AB 723 (Bradford), pending before this committee, 
               extends, from January 1, 2012, to January 1, 2016, charges 
               to electricity customers, known collectively as the public 
               goods charge, to fund energy efficiency, renewable energy 
               and energy research.

             b)   SB 35 (Padilla), pending before the Senate 
               Appropriations Committee, repeals the public goods charge 
               and the renewable energy and research programs, replacing 
               them with a new program.

             c)   SB 410 (Wright)  ,  also before the Senate Appropriations 
               Committee, extends the sunset on the public goods charge 
               and research program for 10 years, to 2022.  

           1)Support.   This bill is supported by Environmental Defense 
            Fund and several other environmental, conservation and 
            renewable energy advocates.  

          2)Opposition.   The bill is opposed by the California 
            Manufacturers Association, whose members often pay large 
            electric utility bills.   
           
           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081