BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1350|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1350
          Author:   Lara (D)
          Amended:  6/23/11 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE  :  9-0, 06/22/11
          AYES:  Wolk, Huff, DeSaulnier, Fuller, Hancock, Hernandez, 
            Kehoe, La Malfa, Liu

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 05/19/11 (Consent) - See last page 
            for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Property taxation:  override rates:  validation 
          by auditor

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires a county auditor, prior to 
          the collection of a property tax imposed for specified 
          purposes, to verify that a property tax increased or 
          extended by a jurisdiction, on or after January 1, 2012, 
          does not exceed the maximum rate authorized by existing 
          law.

           ANALYSIS  :    Proposition 13 (1978) limited property tax 
          rates to one percent, cutting statewide property tax 
          revenues by 57 percent.  The power to allocate the 
          remaining property tax revenues became the Legislature's 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1350
                                                                Page 
          2

          duty.

          The one percent limit on property tax rates did not apply 
          to ad valorem property taxes or special assessments needed 
          to pay the interest and redemption charges on any 
          indebtedness approved by voters before July 1, 1978.  In 
          its 1982 decision in  Car-man v. Alvord  , the California 
          Supreme Court ruled that extraordinary property tax rates 
          (outside the usual one percent ad valorem rate) imposed to 
          fund employee pension systems approved by the voters before 
          July 1, 1978 are valid under Proposition 13.

          This bill:

          1.If a local government extends or increases, after January 
            1, 2012, an ad valorem property tax to support specified 
            pension programs or retirement systems, this bill 
            requires a county auditor to verify, before the increase 
            or extension, that the property tax rate does not exceed 
            the maximum rate authorized by law.

          2.This bill requires a local government to provide the 
            county auditor, in the form, manner, and time prescribed 
            by the county auditor, any documentation that is 
            necessary to verify the imposed property tax rate.

          3.This bill requires the county auditor to reject the 
            increase or extension of any property tax rate that 
            exceeds the maximum rate specified in state law.

          4.The bill requires a local government to reimburse the 
            county auditor's actual and reasonable costs for 
            administering the bill's verification requirement.

           Background
           
          Last year, an audit conducted by the State Controller 
          determined that officials in the City of Bell (Los Angeles 
          County), during the three fiscal years between 2007 and 
          2010, levied an extraordinary property tax rate to pay the 
          City's pension obligations that exceeded the rate allowed 
          under state law.  As a result, property owners in Bell paid 
          approximately $2.9 million in excessive property taxes 
          during those three years.  Rather than allowing the county 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1350
                                                                Page 
          3

          auditor to reallocate the excess revenues to schools, the 
          Legislature required the City of Bell to pay for refunds to 
          taxpayers who overpaid (AB 900, de León, Chapter 223, 
          Statutes of 2010).

          To prevent local governments from imposing excessive rates 
          for their pensions and retirement systems, some legislators 
          want to require county auditors to verify that local 
          governments' extraordinary ad valorem property rates don't 
          exceed statutory limits.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  Yes

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  7/12/11)

          California Taxpayers Association
          County of Los Angeles


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 05/19/11 (Consent)
          AYES: Achadjian, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Bill 
            Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, 
            Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Davis, Dickinson, 
            Donnelly, Eng, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, 
            Beth Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Grove, 
            Hagman, Halderman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Roger 
            Hernández, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, 
            Knight, Lara, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mansoor, 
            Mendoza, Miller, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nestande, 
            Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, 
            Portantino, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, 
            Torres, Valadao, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, 
            John A. Pérez
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Alejo, Gorell


          AGB:nl  7/12/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1350
                                                                Page 
          4














































                                                           CONTINUED