BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1424 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 18, 2011 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Felipe Fuentes, Chair AB 1424 (Committee on Revenue and Taxation) - As Amended: May 4, 2011 Policy Committee: Revenue and Taxation Vote: 9-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill implements various technical, non-controversial tax proposals sponsored by the State Board of Equalization (BOE). Specifically, this bill: 1)Allows BOE to reimburse a manufacturer of a new motor vehicle for the use tax refunded to a buyer or lessee when the new motor vehicle is reacquired by the manufacturer pursuant to California's "Lemon Law." 2)Removes the requirement that retailers and lenders file an election form with BOE prior to claiming a bad debt in the case of accounts held by a lender that have been found worthless and written off by the lender. 3)Makes a technical clarification to the repair, retrofit and modification exception related to the 12-month rebuttable presumption for vessels purchased outside this state. 4)Allows a taxpayer to file a claim for reimbursement of bank charges and third party check charges incurred by the taxpayer as a result of an erroneous processing action or collection action by BOE. 5)Provides BOE and the State Controller's Office (SCO) with express authority to collect orders of restitution awarded to BOE in criminal proceedings in the same manner as tax liabilities. FISCAL EFFECT AB 1424 Page 2 BOE estimates that, with the exception of the order of restitution provisions, this measure would have a negligible impact on state and local revenues. For the orders of restitution, BOE estimates that it will incur one-time costs of $106,000, but will collect $1,136,435 per year in additional restitution. COMMENTS 1)Purpose . This bill is sponsored by BOE and the rationale for each element is as follows:: a) Lemon Law: Use Tax Reimbursement: These provisions change California's Lemon Law in light of applicable case law. b) Bad Debt Election Form Requirement Repeal : BOE state that they have been administering these provisions for approximately 10 years, and these signed election forms have not been of any assistance in verifying the validity of the claims for bad debt losses, nor provided any valuable benefit to the BOE's audit program. c) Vessels Purchased Outside this State : These provisions eliminates situations where a purchaser is inadvertently subject to use tax when the purchaser brings a vessel bought outside the state back into California within the first 12 months of ownership and uses a repair facility. d) Claim for Bank Charge Reimbursement : Occasionally, an erroneous BOE action has resulted in the imposition of bank or third party check charges and this would allow BOE to reimburse taxpayers for bank and third party check charges when those charges are directly attributable to a BOE error, and not because of any fault of the taxpayer. e) Orders of Restitution : BOE states that this would streamline and accelerate the BOE's collection process on orders of restitution and utilize the efficient collection tools available to both the BOE and SCO for tax administration. 2. There is no registered opposition to this bill. AB 1424 Page 3 Analysis Prepared by : Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081