BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1481|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1481
          Author:   Assembly Budget Committee
          Amended:  8/21/12 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
          PRIOR SENATE VOTES NOT RELEVANT

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  Not relevant


           SUBJECT  :    Budget Act of 2012:  Public Safety Budget 
          Trailer Bill

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill provides the statutory changes 
          necessary to implement the Public Safety portions of the 
          2012 Budget Act of 2012-13.  Specifically, this bill (1) 
          clarifies that at least one party demanding a jury on each 
          side of a civil case shall pay non-refundable fee of $150, 
          and that all plaintiffs shall be considered one side of the 
          case, and all other parties shall be considered the other 
          side of the case and specifies that the fee shall be due at 
          least five days before the trial date for unlawful detainer 
          actions and makes other non-substantive clarifying changes 
          related to the jury deposit fee; (2) makes clarifying 
          technical change to exclude the Department of Corrections 
          and Rehabilitation (CDCR), Division of Juvenile Justice 
          (DJJ) wards committed pursuant to In re C.H. from recently 
          enacted statute SB 1021 (Leno), that changed the maximum 
          age of jurisdiction for DJJ wards from 25 to 23.  DJJ wards 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1481
                                                                Page 
          2

          committed pursuant to C.H. have a maximum age of 
          jurisdiction of 21 and should not have been subject to the 
          jurisdictional change made in SB 1021; and (3) clarifies 
          the operative date for the recently enacted prohibition on 
          the use of time-adds as a DJJ disciplinary tool and removes 
          the requirement that the DJJ promulgate regulations 
          relating to ward discharge consideration date extensions.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/21/12 delete the contents of 
          the bill.  The amendments now constitute the bill.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires each party demanding a 
          jury trial to deposit advance jury fees in the amount of 
          $150 with the clerk or judge.  Existing law requires the 
          court to transmit the advance jury fees to the State 
          Treasury for deposit in the Trial Court Trust Fund within 
          45 calendar days after the end of the month in which the 
          advance jury fees are deposited with the court.

          This bill instead requires that at least one party 
          demanding a jury on each side of a civil case pay a 
          nonrefundable fee of $150, unless the fee has been paid by 
          another party on the same side of the case.  This bill 
          makes that fee due on or before the date scheduled for the 
          initial case management conference in the action, except in 
          specified circumstances.  The bill makes related and 
          conforming changes to those provisions. 

          Existing law authorizes the juvenile court to retain 
          jurisdiction over a ward of the court, until the ward 
          attains 21 years of age, except in certain circumstances.  
          Existing law further authorizes the court to retain 
          jurisdiction over a ward who has committed specified 
          serious offenses or other offenses requiring registration 
          as a sex offender, until age 25, if committed to CDCR, 
          Division of Juvenile Facilities, or to a state hospital or 
          mental health facility.  Existing law also requires, on and 
          after July 1, 2012, every person committed by the juvenile 
          court to CDCR, Division of Juvenile Facilities, by reason 
          of committing specified offenses, to be discharged after a 
          two-year period of control, or when that person reaches 23 
          years of age, whichever occurs later, except as specified. 

          This bill removes specified offenses requiring registration 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1481
                                                                Page 
          3

          as a sex offender from those provisions that allow the 
          court, in certain circumstances, to retain jurisdiction 
          over a ward until that person attains either 25 years of 
          age or 23 years of age.  The bill states that these changes 
          apply retroactively.

          Existing law authorizes CDCR to develop and implement a 
          system of graduated sanctions for wards that distinguishes 
          between minor, intermediate, and serious misconduct.  
          Existing law further requires CDCR to promulgate 
          regulations to implement a table of sanctions to be used in 
          determining discharge consideration date extensions.  
          Existing law also authorizes CDCR to extend a ward's 
          discharge consideration date, subject to appeal, to not 
          more than 12 months, for a sustained serious misconduct 
          violation if all other sanctioning options have been 
          considered and determined to be unsuitable in light of the 
          previous case history and circumstances of the misconduct.

          This bill deletes the above provision requiring CDCR to 
          promulgate regulations to implement a table of sanctions, 
          in certain circumstances.  The bill also revises the above 
          provision regarding a ward's discharge to instead prohibit 
          CDCR from extending a ward's discharge consideration date 
          for incidents occurring after September 1, 2012.

          The bill appropriates $1,000 from the General Fund to CDCR 
          for administration.

          This bill declares that it is to take effect immediately as 
          a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget 
          Bill.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  47-23, 3/22/12
          AYES:  Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Block, 
            Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, 
            Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, 
            Chesbro, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, 
            Furutani, Galgiani, Gatto, Gordon, Hayashi, Roger 
            Hernández, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Lara, Ma, 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1481
                                                                Page 
          4

            Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Solorio, 
            Swanson, Torres, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. 
            Pérez
          NOES:  Achadjian, Bill Berryhill, Conway, Cook, Donnelly, 
            Beth Gaines, Garrick, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Jeffries, 
            Jones, Knight, Mansoor, Miller, Morrell, Nestande, 
            Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Silva, Smyth, Wagner
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Fletcher, Gorell, Hall, Harkey, Logue, 
            Bonnie Lowenthal, Mendoza, Portantino, Skinner, Valadao


          RJG:dm  8/22/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****
          




























                                                           CONTINUED