BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: ab 1585
          SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN              AUTHOR:  j. Pérez
                                                         VERSION: 6/25/12
          Analysis by:  Mark Stivers                     FISCAL:  yes
          Hearing date:  July 3, 2012



          SUBJECT:

          Reappropriation of Proposition 1C bond funds

          DESCRIPTION:

          This bill reappropriates $50 million of Proposition 1C bond 
          funds to the Infill Infrastructure Grant Program and the 
          Transit-Oriented Development Program.  

          ANALYSIS:

          In November 2006, California voters approved Proposition 1C, the 
          $2.85 billion Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 
          2006.  Among other things, Proposition 1C included:

           $790 for the Infill Infrastructure Grant (IIG) Program, under 
            which the Department of Housing and Community Development 
            (HCD) offers gap financing grants to cover the costs of 
            infrastructure improvements necessary for the development of 
            higher-density affordable and mixed-income housing in 
            locations designated as infill.

           $300 million for the Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) 
            Program, under which HCD  provides grants to cities, counties, 
            and transit agencies for the provision of infrastructure 
            necessary to support mixed-income housing developments within 
            close proximity to a transit station.  Housing developers may 
            also obtain loans for the development of the TOD housing 
            units.  

          Over the succeeding years, the Legislature appropriated these 
          funds to HCD, and HCD awarded all of the funds available under 
          both programs.  For various reasons, some awardees have returned 
          their awards, making the funds again available for a new round 
          of awards.  HCD reports that it currently has $25 million 
          available for the IIG Program and another $25 million available 
          for the TOD Program.  HCD made these particular awards in the 




          AB 1585 (PÉREZ)                                        Page 2

                                                                       


          first rounds of funding, for which its appropriation (i.e., 
          deadline to encumber funds) expired on June 30, 2008.  

           This bill  reappropriates to HCD $25 million for the IIG Program 
          and $25 million for the TOD Program from Proposition 1C 
          accounts.
          
          COMMENTS:

           1.Purpose of the bill .  According to the author, it is important 
            to sustain and build critical infrastructure projects in our 
            state, especially in the housing sector.  Given the economic 
            downturn and loss of jobs in the construction industry, the 
            state must use its available resources to stimulate recovery 
            of the economy.   In 2006, the voters approved Proposition 1C 
            and put their faith in government to use bond funds 
            efficiently and as quickly as possible.   The appropriation in 
            this bill will allow HCD to issue a Notice of Funding 
            Availability for infill and transit-oriented projects that are 
            shovel-ready and of great value to our communities and 
            neighborhoods. 

           2.More disencumbrances possibly pending  .  Under both the TOD and 
            IIG Programs, HCD has set progress deadlines for awardees.  
            One of the major deadlines is June 30 of this year, and it is 
            very possible, if not likely, that some awardees will fail to 
            meet the deadline.  HCD is currently in negotiations with 
            various developers and expects to continue those negotiations 
            up until the last minute, so the amount, if any, of additional 
            disencumbrances will not be known until July 1 or later, at 
            which time the author may wish to appropriate these additional 
            encumbrances.  

          Assembly Votes:
               
               Previous votes are not relevant.

          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the committee before noon on 
          Wednesday,                                             June 27, 
          2012)

               SUPPORT:  Bridge Housing
                         California Association of Housing Authorities
                         California Association of Local Housing Finance 
          Agencies
                         California Housing Consortium




          AB 1585 (PÉREZ)                                        Page 3

                                                                       


                         Commercial Investment Services
                         First Community Housing
                         John Stewart Company
                         Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern 
          California
                         Oakland Tenants Union
                         Resources for Community Development
                         Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation
          
               OPPOSED:  None received.