BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






          SENATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT   BILL NO:  AB 1606
          Gloria Negrete McLeod, Chair   Hearing date:  May 7, 2012
          AB 1606 (Perea)    as introduced  2/07/12    FISCAL:  YES

           LOCAL LABOR RELATIONS:  FACTFINDING PROVISIONS
           

           HISTORY  :

            Sponsor:  American Federation of State, County and 
                    Municipal Employees (Co-Sponsor)
                   California Professional Firefighters (Co-Sponsor)
                   Peace Officers Research Association of California 
                   (Co-Sponsor)
                   Service Employees International Union, California 
                   (Co-Sponsor)

              Other legislation:  AB 646 (Atkins)
                         Chapter 680, Statutes of 2011


           ASSEMBLY VOTES  :

              PER & SS             4-1  3/28/12
              Appropriations       12-5 4/18/12
              Assembly Floor       46-244/23/12
           

          SUMMARY  :

          AB 1606 clarifies the situations in which an employee 
          organization representing local public employees may request 
          factfinding upon reaching impasse in labor negotiations with 
          the employer.


           BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS  :
          
          1)   Current law  :

            a)  establishes the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA), which 
            governs labor relations between local public employers and 
            the recognized representatives of local public employees.
          Pamela Schneider
          Date:  4/30/12                                         Page 1 











            b)  requires collective bargaining over wages, hours, and 
            other terms and conditions of employment between public 
            employers and public employee organizations.

            c)  in cases of impasse that occur in collective 
            bargaining, establishes a mediation process intended to aid 
            in resolving disputes.

            d)  allows public employee organizations to request 
            factfinding if a mediator is unable to reach a settlement 
            within 30 days of appointment, and establishes procedures 
            and requirements for the fact-finding process.

            e)  allows an employer to implement its last, best and 
            final offer once any applicable mediation and fact-finding 
            procedures have been exhausted and, despite the 
            implementation of the best and final offer, allows a 
            recognized employee organization the right each year to 
            meet and confer.

            f)  delegates jurisdiction over the employer-employee 
            relationship to the Public Employment Relations Board 
            (PERB) and charges PERB with resolving disputes and 
            enforcing the statutory duties and rights of local public 
            agency employers and employee organizations.

          2)   This bill  clarifies that if the dispute leading to 
          impasse was not submitted to mediation, the employee 
          organization may request factfinding within 30 days  after  the 
          date that either party provided the other with written notice 
          of the declaration of impasse.


           COMMENTS  :

          1)   Recent PERB Actions  :  

             On December 8, 2011, PERB approved amendments to three 
            regulation sections and the adoption of two new regulation 
            sections as emergency regulations necessary for the 
            implementation of the provisions of AB 646.  The emergency 
            rulemaking package was submitted to the Office of 
          Pamela Schneider
          Date:  4/30/12                                         Page 2 










            Administrative Law (OAL) on December 19, 2011.  On December 
            29, 2011, OAL approved the emergency regulatory action, 
            effective on January 1, 2012.  Below is the relevant 
            excerpt from those new regulations:

            32802.  Request for Factfinding under the MMBA.

              (a)  An exclusive representative may request that the 
              parties' differences be submitted to a factfinding panel. 
               The request shall be accompanied by a statement that the 
              parties have been unable to effect a settlement.  Such a 
              request may be filed:

                (1)  Not sooner than 30 days, but not more than 45 
                days, following the appointment or selection of a 
                mediator pursuant either to the parties' agreement to 
                mediate or a mediation process required by a public 
                agency's local rules; or

                (2)  If the dispute was not submitted to mediation, not 
                later than 30 days following the date that either party 
                provided the other with written notice of a declaration 
                of impasse.

          2)   Arguments in Support  :

            According to the author, "Ambiguity in the drafting of AB 
            646 has called into question whether an employer can forgo 
            all impasse procedures, including mediation and 
            fact-finding.  In fact, several local government employers 
            argue that AB 646 does not require fact-finding if the 
            parties do not engage in mediation.

            "Last December, PERB adopted emergency regulations to 
            implement the provisions of AB 646.  The adopted 
            regulations provide that, if the parties opt to mediate, a 
            fact-finding request can be filed not sooner than 30 days, 
            but not more than 45 days, following the appointment or 
            selection of a mediator.  In cases where a dispute is not 
            submitted to a mediator, the request for fact-finding must 
            occur within 30 days following the date that either party 
            provided the other with written notice of declaration of 
            impasse.
          Pamela Schneider
          Date:  4/30/12                                         Page 3 











            "However, the issue whether AB 646 requires that mediation 
            occur as a precondition to an employee organization's 
            ability to request fact-finding remains unresolved.  AB 
            1606 would clarify that fact-finding is available to 
            employee organizations in all situations, regardless of 
            whether the employer and employee have engaged in 
            mediation."

            Supporters state, "During the PERB rulemaking process, it 
            became apparent that AB 646 was drafted in a manner that 
            called into question whether mediation was a precondition 
            to an employee organization's ability to request 
            factfinding.  Numerous employers and employee organizations 
            provided public comments on the issue.  The majority of 
            interested parties, both employer and labor 
            representatives, urged a reading of AB 646 that provides 
            for a factfinding request whether mediation occurs or not.  
            In December 2011, PERB adopted emergency regulations that 
            implemented the majority opinion, allowing factfinding to 
            be requested in all circumstances, because they found it to 
            be the most efficient ways to implement the entirety of AB 
            646 and accurately reflect the intent of the Legislature.

            "AB 1606 seeks to provide a final, statutory clarification 
            of this question, by revising the Government Code to allow 
            factfinding in all circumstances in which a local public 
            employer and its employees have reached an impasse in their 
            negotiations.  AB 1606 properly reflects the intent of the 
            Legislature to strengthen collective bargaining by ensuring 
            employers and employees operate in good faith and work 
            collaboratively to deliver government services in a fair, 
            cost-efficient manner."

          3)   Arguments in Opposition  :

            Opponents state, "While it is indicated that this bill is 
            intended to be technical and clarifying of existing law, 
            the language states that the panel shall consider different 
            items when reaching their decision.  It is believed these 
            factors take more and more discretion away from the Board 
            (i.e., the financial ability of the public agency, consumer 
            price index, etc.) and puts it into the hands of the fact 
          Pamela Schneider
          Date:  4/30/12                                         Page 4 










            finding panel.  While it is not mentioned in the bill's 
            text, the decision of the fact finding panel will be made 
            public so it could also have political implications.

            "This bill would be applicable to both formal contract 
            negotiations and any Meet and Confer process involving 
            changes to departmental operations that have an impact to 
            the wages, hours or working conditions of employees.  The 
            fact finding panel would be required to consider, weigh, 
            and be guided by the criteria outlines in arriving at their 
            findings and recommendations.  The broad criteria allows 
            for the panel to consider factors normally not considered 
            by the County as being relevant to operations.  The costs 
            of this process or revenue impacts are unknown at this 
            time.  However, many County agencies/departments implement 
            operational changes to gain efficiencies and/or lower costs 
            that require a Meet and Confer process to address impacts 
            to employees.  This bill could significantly impact the 
            proposed changes which could be implemented."

          4)   SUPPORT  :

             American Federation of State, County and Municipal 
              Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO,      Co-Sponsor
             California Professional Firefighters (CPF), Co-Sponsor
            Peace Officers Research Association of California (PORAC), 
            Co-Sponsor
            Service Employees International Union (SEIU), California, 
            Co-Sponsor
            California Labor Federation (CLF)
            California Teachers Association (CTA)
            Laborers' Locals 777 & 792

          5)   OPPOSITION  :

            County of Orange Board of Supervisors




                                      #####


          Pamela Schneider
          Date:  4/30/12                                         Page 5 



















































          Pamela Schneider
          Date:  4/30/12                                         Page 6