BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1623
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 17, 2012

              ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND CONSUMER 
                                     PROTECTION
                                 Mary Hayashi, Chair
                    AB 1623 (Yamada) - As Amended:  March 29, 2012
           
          SUBJECT  :   Weights and measures: inspection fees.

           SUMMARY  :   Extends the authority of a county board of 
          supervisors to charge fees to recover the costs of the county 
          sealer until January 1, 2018, and establishes or revises device 
          fee caps.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Extends the authority of a county board of supervisors to 
            charge fees to recover the costs of the county sealer, as 
            provided, from January 1, 2013, until January 1, 2018.

          2)Establishes the following fee caps for marinas, mobilehome 
            parks, recreational vehicle parks, and apartment complexes, as 
            specified:

             a)   $2 per device per space or apartment for water 
               submeters;

             b)   $3 per device per space or apartment for electric 
               submeters; and,

             c)   $4 per device per space or apartment for vapor 
               submeters.

          3)Increases the fee cap from $175 to $200 per device for truck 
            mounted or stationary liquefied petroleum gas meters.

          4)Increases the fee cap from $25 to $75 per device for wholesale 
            and vehicle meters.

          5)Establishes a fee cap of $30 per device for computing scales, 
            as specified, and provides that the portion of the annual 
            registration fee consisting for the business location device 
            fees authorized by this bill shall not exceed $1,000 for each 
            business location.

          6)Establishes a fee cap of $80 per device for jewelry and 
            prescription scales, as specified.








                                                                  AB 1623
                                                                  Page  2


          7)Establishes a fee cap of $50 per device for weighing devices, 
            other than computing, jewelry, and prescription scales with 
            capacities between 100 and 2,000 pounds.

          8)Establishes a $60 fee cap per device for vehicle odometers 
            utilized to charge mileage usage fees in vehicle rental 
            transactions.

          9)Specifies that the portion of the annual registration fee 
            consisting of the business location fee and the device fees 
            authorized by this bill shall not exceed $400 per business 
            location. 

          10)Clarifies that the total portion of the annual registration 
            fee consisting of the business location fee and device fees 
            authorized by this bill not exceed $1,000 for each business 
            location.

          11)Exempts vehicles employed in vehicle rental transactions from 
            the definition of a single business location.

          12)Defines the "computing scale" as a weighing device with a 
            capacity of less than 100 pounds that indicates the money 
            value of any commodity weighed, at predetermined unit prices, 
            throughout all or part of the weighing range of the scale.

          13)Makes technical changes.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires the sealer of a county to inspect and test weighing 
            and measuring devices, as specified, that are used or sold in 
            the county and to weigh or measure packages to determine 
            whether they contain the amount represented, as provided. 

          2)Permits a county board of supervisors to charge fees, not 
            exceeding the cost of inspecting or testing weighing and 
            measuring devices, to recover the costs to perform these 
            duties until January 1, 2013.

          3)Specifies that the annual registration fee for a business that 
            uses a commercial weighing or measuring device or devices 
            shall consist of a location fee, a Department of Food and 
            Agriculture administrative fee, and a device fee.








                                                                  AB 1623
                                                                  Page  3


          4)Provides that for all other commercial weighing or measuring 
            devices not listed, the device fee shall not exceed $20 per 
            device, and that for purposes of these provisions, the 
            registration fee shall not exceed the sum of $1,000 for each 
            business location.

          5)Specifies that the device fee for marinas, mobilehome parks, 
            recreational vehicle parks, and apartment complexes, as 
            specified, shall not exceed $2 per device.

          6)Provides that for liquefied petroleum gas meters the device 
            fee shall not exceed $175 per device.

          7)Provides that the device fee for wholesale and vehicle meters 
            shall not exceed $25 per device.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown.  This bill is keyed non-fiscal.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "County Sealers of Weights 
          and Measures annually inspect commercial weighing and measuring 
          devices to ensure that consumers are getting what they pay for 
          and businesses don't lose money to faulty equipment.  Business 
          and Professions code 12240 gives authority to counties to 
          establish registration fees on inspected devices to provide 
          funding for their inspection program.  Section 12240 also 
          prescribes limits for these fees in two ways: the law prohibits 
          counties from creating fees that exceed the cost of inspection, 
          and it prohibits counties from creating fees that exceed 
          specific monetary amounts outlined in the law.  The law sets 
          these monetary limits at different levels for different 
          categories of devices to reflect the resources necessary to 
          testing that category including a category for devices that 
          don't necessarily fall into any other existing category.  In the 
          event that a county collects more funds from registration fees 
          than covers costs despite these restrictions, Business and 
          Professions Codes 12242 and 12243 mandate that the program place 
          the excess funds in the county general fund where the county 
          will use them to reduce the registration fees creating the 
          excess.  AB 889 (Ruskin) of 2005 set up the current fee caps 
          that were progressively implemented over the three years 
          following AB 889's passage.  Section 12240's fee restrictions 
          have not received updates since full implementation of AB 889 
          occurred in 2008.









                                                                  AB 1623
                                                                  Page  4

          "AB 1623 seeks to alleviate this problem by raising fee caps on 
          certain devices with significant disparities between current fee 
          caps and the cost of testing the device. ?In addition to the 
          substantive changes being made in the bill, AB 1623 extends the 
          sunset of the fee authority to January 1, 2018.  This will 
          prevent the authority from lapsing and ensure that discussions 
          on the provisions of the authority will be entered into again in 
          2018.

          "AB 1623 also seeks to address an issue raised the last time the 
          authority's sunset was extended.  During the discussions of AB 
          2361 (Ruskin) of 2010, the last bill to extend the sunset, The 
          Truck Renting and Leasing Association (TRALA) raised objections 
          to the way the registration fees were being applied to their 
          vehicles in certain counties under the current version of the 
          law.  An agreement was reached between the sponsor and TRALA at 
          that time to only extend the sunset date two years (to 2013) and 
          that Agricultural Commissioners and Sealers would temporarily 
          cease applying the registration fee to rental trucks while they 
          studied the truck renting industry to learn more about it.

          AB 1623 attempts to address this issue by separately 
          categorizing rental vehicles used in mileage based transactions 
          in Section 12240 of the Business and Professions Code, setting a 
          $50 per truck fee to cover costs associated with testing the 
          odometer, changing the definition of "business location" to 
          exclude individual rental vehicles from the definition of 
          "business location" for the purposes of the business location 
          fee, and setting a $400 total fee cap for a vehicle rental 
          business.

           Background  .  Current law allows county boards of supervisors to 
          establish fees for business locations to partially fund local 
          weights and measures enforcement programs.  The fees are the 
          single largest source of revenue for the county program outside 
          the County General Fund.  The statute will sunset in January 1, 
          2013.

          The authority for weights and measures registration fees was 
          passed by the Legislature in 1982 to provide funding for weights 
          and measures inspection activities.  The law was amended 
          multiple times to add additional devices to the registration 
          program and to adjust the schedule of maximum fees.  The section 
          now applies to virtually all weighing and measuring devices used 
          commercially.  The only exceptions are farm milk tanks, which 








                                                                  AB 1623
                                                                  Page  5

          are specifically exempted, and check out scanners, which are not 
          considered weighing or measuring devices.

          The range of weighing and measuring devices included in the 
          registration program currently includes retail fuel dispensing 
          meters; water meters; electric meters that measure electricity 
          that is sub-metered by a mobile home park; apartment complex, or 
          boat dock; liquefied petroleum gas meters or gas vapor meters 
          that are-sub-metered; truck scales, cattle scales and grocery 
          counter scales; taxi meters; and a variety of other devices that 
          weigh or meter a commodity offered for sale.  The sunset date on 
          the device registration fees has been extended in 1985, 1987, 
          1988, 1992, 1995, 1997, 2000, 2005, and again in 2010.

           Support  .  The sponsor of this bill, the California Agricultural 
          Commissioners and Sealers Association (CACASA), writes in 
          support, "The current structure for the annual 'Device 
          Registration Program' for commercial weighing and measuring 
          devices was established in 2005 (AB 889, Ruskin).  Through the 
          provisions of this bill, local county governments were provided 
          with a framework to recover costs for ensuring the accuracy of 
          commercial transactions that were calculated using a scale, 
          meter, pump, or other weighing/measuring device used in the 
          marketplace.  County Sealers of Weights and Measures annually 
          inspect these commercial weighing and measuring devices to 
          ensure that consumers are getting what they pay for; and to 
          ensure a 'level playing field' between industry.  

          "Since the 'fee caps' were established in 2005, counties have 
          been operating annual inspection programs as directed by state 
          law.  After several years of operating at the maximum fee 
          allowable under current law, the majority of counties in the 
          State have found that some adjustments to the caps are necessary 
          to ensure cost recovery and the viability of the device 
          registration program.  

          "The only option available for local governments to recover 
          costs for administering this service is to request that the 
          Legislature make an appropriate adjustment to the fee caps.  
          Under the Government Code, virtually all other local government 
          programs have the flexibility to adjust local fees to recover 
          expenses without State Legislative action.  This program 
          requires Legislative authority.  

          "Local governments will need to take the next step to justify 








                                                                  AB 1623
                                                                  Page  6

          and adopt new fees locally if they individually choose to adjust 
          the fees established by the state.  CACASA agrees to continue 
          operating under a 'cap' system to ensure predictability from 
          year to year, but proposes to allow local governments to simply 
          recover costs under an updated, reasonable fee cap structure.  
          Any attempt to change fees by a Board of Supervisors would be 
          administered under a strict fee study and proposed and adopted 
          in a public meeting."

           Opposition  .  Avis/Budget Group, Enterprise Holdings and The 
          Hertz Corporation write in opposition, "Since having the current 
          statutory authority, county sealers have rarely exercised their 
          regulatory power to require registration and inspect the 
          odometers of California's approximately 300,000 rental vehicles. 
          There are a number of reasons for this lack of action, including 
          the non-existence of any consumer complaints, the fact that it 
          is a rare rental customer who ever incurs a mileage charge, and 
          the lack of manpower and resources in the 58 counties to 
          efficiently administer such a program.

          "It is only since the advent of the perpetual county fiscal 
          crisis that Sealers have begun to express interest in exercising 
          their current statutory authority.  The impetus for their 
          interest in rental car odometers is clearly not from a consumer 
          protection perspective.  California's 300,000 plus rental 
          vehicles are subject to over 10 million rental transactions 
          annually in California, involving over 25 million rental days.  
          Yet, the Sealers cannot produce one consumer complaint involving 
          mileage charges.  The two primary reasons for this fact are: (1) 
          it is a rare rental customer (less than 1%) that incurs a 
          mileage charge, and (2) rental vehicles are almost exclusively 
          current and prior year models which have the latest advancements 
          in odometer technology.  Today's odometers are virtually tamper 
          proof.

          "The industry and the sponsors have been in discussion involving 
          this issue for nearly two years.  The subject provision of law 
          was written with owner operated vehicles, such as taxis, in 
          mind.  It was never the intent of the Legislature to ensnarl 
          rental vehicles in this requirement.  Despite this fact, 
          language that would exempt rental cars from the onerous 
          provisions of odometer registration and fees has been offered to 
          and rejected by the sponsors."

           Previous legislation  .  AB 2361 (Ruskin), Chapter 260, Statutes 








                                                                  AB 1623
                                                                  Page  7

          of 2010, extends the sunset date on the authority of the board 
          of supervisors of a county to charge fees to recover the costs 
          of the county sealer to perform specified duties until January 
          1, 2013.

          AB 889 (Ruskin), Chapter 529, Statutes of 2005, extends 
          authority for county sealers of weights and measures to levy 
          civil penalties for violations in lieu of criminal prosecution; 
          extends the sunset on the authority for counties to charge 
          annual registration and device fees until January 1, 2011; 
          updates and revises the fee schedule levels; establishes, until 
          January 1, 2009, the authority for counties to inspect the 
          pricing accuracy of retail point of sale systems.

          AB 1810 (Wiggins), Chapter 512, Statutes of 2000, extends the 
          sunset dates granting authority for civil penalties and device 
          registration fees relating to weights and measures.

          SB 189 (Kelley), Chapter 476, Statutes of 1997, extends the 
          sunset date on the authority of the board of supervisors of a 
          county to charge fees to recover the costs of the county sealer 
          to perform specified duties until to January 1, 2001.

          AB 1728 (Murray), Chapter 47, Statutes of 1995, extends the 
          sunset date on the authority of the board of supervisors of a 
          county to charge fees to recover the costs of the county sealer 
          to perform specified duties until January 1, 1998.

          AB 2987 (Cramer) Chapter 1380, Statutes of 1982, established fee 
          collection authority for Weights and Measures program on a 
          county by county basis.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          California Agricultural Commissioners and Sealers Association 
          (sponsor)

           Opposition 
           
          Avis/Budget Group
          Enterprise Holdings
          The Hertz Corporation
           








                                                                 AB 1623
                                                                  Page  8

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Rebecca May / B.,P. & C.P. / (916) 
          319-3301