BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1708|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                    CONSENT


          Bill No:  AB 1708
          Author:   Gatto (D)
          Amended:  7/5/12 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE INSURANCE COMMITTEE  :  9-0, 6/28/12
          AYES:  Calderon, Gaines, Anderson, Corbett, Correa, Lieu, 
            Lowenthal, Price, Wyland
           
          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  73-0, 5/10/12 (Consent) - See last page 
            for vote


            SUBJECT  :    Vehicles:  electronic verification of 
                      financial responsibility and insurance

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill clarifies existing law to allow 
          motorists to present proof of insurance electronically to 
          law enforcement agents upon request.  This bill also 
          authorizes auto insurance companies to provide, upon 
          request of a policyholder, an electronic version of the 
          proof of insurance card required by law.  

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1708
                                                                Page 
          2

          1. Requires every driver and every owner of a motor vehicle 
             to be able to establish financial responsibility, and, 
             at all times, carry in the vehicle evidence of a form of 
             financial responsibility, which may be obtained by a law 
             enforcement officer from the electronic reporting system 
             established by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).

          2. Requires, upon the demand of a peace officer, that 
             evidence of registration and proof of financial 
             responsibility be provided by a person driving a motor 
             vehicle.

          3. Requires a driver who is issued a notice to appear for 
             any alleged violation of the Vehicle Code or the driver 
             of a motor vehicle involved in an accident to furnish 
             written evidence of financial responsibility.

          4. Requires an insurer issuing policies of automobile 
             liability insurance or motor vehicle liability 
             insurance, upon the request of its insured or the DMV, 
             to promptly issue written verification as to the 
             existence of that coverage.

          5. The California Constitution requires the state to 
             reimburse local agencies and school districts for 
             certain costs mandated by the state.  Statutory 
             provisions establish procedures for making that 
             reimbursement.

          This bill:

          1. Authorizes an insurer issuing policies of automobile 
             liability insurance or motor vehicle insurance to issue, 
             upon the request of the insured and to the extent 
             available, electronic verification as to the existence 
             of the coverage to a mobile electronic device, as 
             defined, and allows a person to provide evidence of 
             financial responsibility, upon the demand of a peace 
             officer, through the use of a mobile electronic device.

          2. Requires, when a person provides evidence of financial 
             responsibility, using a mobile electronic device, to a 
             peace officer, the peace officer to only view the 
             evidence of financial responsibility and would prohibit 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1708
                                                                Page 
          3

             him/her from viewing any other content on the mobile 
             electronic device. 

          3. Requires, whenever a person presents a mobile electronic 
             device upon the demand of a peace officer, the person to 
             assume all liability for any damage to the mobile 
             electronic device.

           Background 
           
          According to the author's office, the law is currently 
          silent on whether or not a motorist may provide an 
          electronic version of their proof of insurance. This 
          creates uncertainty for both auto insurance providers and 
          motorists as to what form their proof of insurance may be 
          presented in.  There have been reports of some officers 
          accepting electronic forms, at their discretion, due to the 
          vagueness of the code sections that cover proof of 
          insurance. 

           Privacy protection  .  Some concerns have been expressed 
          about the personal information stored on a cell phone.  
          Probabilities what they are, at some point some personal 
          information will be unintentionally disclosed when 
          providing a peace officer an electronic device with 
          personal information.  At issue than is what can be done 
          with the information, especially under the laws of criminal 
          procedure.

          Proposition 8 (1982) added Article 1, Section 28(f)(2), to 
          the California Constitution ("Victim's Bill of Rights") 
          that requires that all relevant evidence be admissible in a 
          criminal proceeding, with some exceptions.  Fourth 
          Amendment jurisprudence has firmly established, under the 
          Plain View Doctrine, that when a person voluntarily grants 
          access to otherwise protected area, evidence discovered in 
          the course of that search is admissible if the evidence is 
          in plain view; the officer discovers evidence, contraband, 
          or a fruit or instrumentality of a crime; and the officer 
          has probable cause to believe (is immediately apparent) 
          that the item is evidence, contraband, or a fruit or 
          instrumentality of a crime.  (See Arizona v. Hicks 480 U.S. 
          321 (1987).)  


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1708
                                                                Page 
          4

          In order to protect personal privacy, this bill provides 
          that "the peace officer ? shall only view the evidence of 
          financial responsibility and is prohibited from viewing any 
          other content on the mobile electronic device."  This 
          clarifies that the individual is only voluntarily granting 
          access to the proof of financial responsibility when 
          turning over the personal electronic device.  

          Nonetheless, this bill does not seek to amend Proposition 8 
          (which would require a 2/3 vote).  Evidence unintentionally 
          accessed during an examination (for instance, an unexpected 
          text received while the officer is reviewing the electronic 
          proof of coverage) might still be admissible under 
          Proposition 8 and the Plain View Doctrine.  

          Practically speaking, this might mean that any person who 
          hands their cell phone over to a peace officer voluntarily 
          risks disclosure of private information accidentally 
          revealed, even though this bill only narrowly authorizes 
          peace officers to view evidence of financial 
          responsibility.  

           Officer safety  .  As technology develops, new risks may 
          emerge.  Anecdotes involve small weapons disguised as cell 
          phones or small electronics may pose some additional 
          danger.  The author's office has expressed an interest in 
          monitoring this issue, although no public safety groups 
          oppose the bill and no proposals have been made to address 
          the issue.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  Yes

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/6/12)

          Association of California Insurance Companies
          Department of Insurance
          Personal Insurance Federation of California

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author's office states that 
          this bill will be a step towards greater convenience for 
          motorists by government acknowledging and adapting to the 
          more common use of electronics in everyday life.  With the 
          rise of smartphones and other personal electronic devices, 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1708
                                                                Page 
          5

          more and more transactions between persons and business, as 
          well as between persons and government, are occurring 
          electronically.  As a result, various sorts of information 
          are being transmitted to, and kept on, these devices for 
          easier access.

          The author's office also points out that in many cases, the 
          law and government services have not kept up with new 
          technology.  One such instance is with vital documents on 
          personal electronic devices.  With more and more companies 
          connecting with their customers and providing services via 
          mobile applications, it seems that now is the time for the 
          State of California to provide the same convenience to 
          their customers-the People of our State.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  73-0, 5/10/12
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, 
            Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, 
            Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Davis, Dickinson, 
            Donnelly, Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Beth Gaines, 
            Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Gorell, Grove, Hagman, 
            Halderman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Roger Hernández, Hill, 
            Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Jones, Knight, Lara, Logue, Bonnie 
            Lowenthal, Ma, Mansoor, Mendoza, Miller, Mitchell, 
            Monning, Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Pan, Perea, 
            Portantino, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, 
            Torres, Valadao, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, 
            John A. Pérez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cook, Fletcher, Furutani, Jeffries, 
            Norby, Olsen, V. Manuel Pérez


          JJA:k  8/7/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****






                                                           CONTINUED