BILL NUMBER: AB 1719 CHAPTERED BILL TEXT CHAPTER 636 FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE SEPTEMBER 27, 2012 APPROVED BY GOVERNOR SEPTEMBER 27, 2012 PASSED THE SENATE AUGUST 28, 2012 PASSED THE ASSEMBLY AUGUST 29, 2012 AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 24, 2012 AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 21, 2012 AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 6, 2012 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 27, 2012 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 25, 2012 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 28, 2012 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Fuentes (Principal coauthor: Senator Lowenthal) (Coauthor: Assembly Member Brownley) FEBRUARY 16, 2012 An act to add and repeal Sections 60605.87 and 60605.88 of the Education Code, relating to instructional materials, and making an appropriation therefor. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1719, Fuentes. Supplemental instructional materials: English language development: mathematics. Existing law requires the State Board of Education to adopt basic instructional materials for use in kindergarten and grades 1 to 8, inclusive, and authorizes the state board to establish criteria for that purpose. Existing law requires the state board in reviewing and adopting instructional materials to use specified criteria and ensure that, in its judgment, the submitted instructional materials meet all of the specified criteria. Existing law requires the State Department of Education to recommend, and the state board to approve, evaluation criteria to guide the development and review of supplemental instructional materials for English language arts and mathematics to provide a bridge between the California common core academic content standards and the standards-aligned instructional materials currently being used by local educational agencies. Existing law requires the state board to perform specified reviews and to approve or reject all, or a portion, of the list of supplemental instructional materials proposed by the department and authorizes the state board to add an item to that list, as specified. Existing law also permits the governing board of a school district to approve supplemental instructional materials other than those approved by the state board if the governing board performs specified reviews and determines that other supplemental instructional materials are aligned with the California common core academic content standards and meet the needs of the pupils of the district. Existing law requires supplemental instructional materials approved by the state board and the governing board of a school district to be reviewed by content review experts, as specified. This bill would require the department to recommend, and the state board to approve, evaluation criteria to guide the development and review of supplemental instructional materials for English learners. The bill would require the department to develop a list by March 1, 2014, of supplemental instructional materials for beginning through advanced levels of proficiency for use in kindergarten and grades 1 to 8, inclusive, that are aligned with the revised English language development standards. The bill would require content review experts, who are recommended by the department and approved by the state board, to review the supplemental instructional materials. The bill would appropriate $500,000 in one-time federal Title I carryover funds, as specified, from the Federal Trust Fund to the department for purposes of conducting this review. The bill would, by June 30, 2014, require the state board to approve or reject supplemental instructional materials, as specified. The bill would authorize the governing boards of school districts and county boards of education to approve supplemental instructional materials other than those approved by the state board if the governing board of a school district or county board of education performs specified reviews and determines that other supplemental instructional materials are aligned with the revised English language development standards and meet the needs of pupils of the district who are English learners. This bill would require the department, at least 30 days before the state board takes specified action, to develop a list of supplemental instructional materials for use in kindergarten and grades 1 to 7, inclusive, that are aligned with the California common core academic content standards for mathematics. The bill would require the department to recommend, and the state board to approve, content review experts to review supplemental instructional materials submitted for approval, as specified. The bill also would require the state board, on or before July 30, 2013, to perform specified reviews and to approve or reject all, or a portion, of the list of supplemental instructional materials proposed by the department and would authorize the state board to add an item to that list, as specified. The bill would require the department to use certain federal carryover funds to implement the development of this list of mathematics supplemental instructional materials. This bill would become operative contingent upon the enactment of AB 1246 of the 2011-12 Regular Session. Appropriation: yes. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: (a) California and 40 other states have adopted common core academic standards for language arts and mathematics to provide consistent and clear expectations of what pupils need to learn to compete in a global economy. (b) In 1999, California adopted the English language development standards for the purpose of stating what pupils must know and be able to do as they move toward full fluency in the English language. The standards are to work in tandem with the language arts academic standards; however, they have not been revised or aligned to the approved common core language arts standards. (c) Chapter 605 of the Statutes of 2011 (Assembly Bill 124) requires the revision and alignment of the English language development standards as specified. (d) There are currently 1.4 million pupils who are English learners and enrolled in California public schools. (e) It is critical that "bridge" supplemental instructional materials be available to English learners that reflect both the common core language arts and English language development standards in order for pupils to be held accountable to the common core language arts standards via assessments. (f) School districts, county offices of education, and charter schools, at a minimum, need supplemental English language development instructional materials to ensure teachers and pupils have the proper tools to begin to bridge the curriculum between the state's current content standards in language arts to the English language development standards. SEC. 2. Section 60605.87 is added to the Education Code, to read: 60605.87. (a) The department shall recommend, and the state board shall approve, evaluation criteria to guide the development and review of supplemental instructional materials for English learners. (b) Notwithstanding any other law, and on a one-time basis, the department, on or before March 1, 2014, shall develop a list of supplemental instructional materials for beginning through advanced levels of proficiency for use in kindergarten and grades 1 to 8, inclusive, that are aligned with the revised English language development standards adopted pursuant to Section 60811.3. The supplemental instructional materials shall provide a bridge between the current English language development standards and the revised English language development standards pursuant to Section 60811.3 with the purpose of ensuring the supplemental materials address the unique features of the English language development standards and remain consistent with the relevant elements of the evaluation criteria for English language arts supplemental instructional materials adopted pursuant to Section 60605.86. (c) (1) The department shall recommend, and the state board shall approve, content review experts to review, in an open and transparent process, supplemental instructional materials submitted for approval in the subject area of English language development. (2) The majority of content review experts approved pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be elementary and secondary schoolteachers who are credentialed in English language arts, possess the appropriate state English learner authorization, and have five years of classroom experience instructing English learners. The content review experts also shall include appropriate persons possessing English learner expertise from postsecondary educational institutions and school and school district curriculum administrators possessing English learner expertise, and other persons who are knowledgeable in English language arts and English language development. (d) (1) On or before June 30, 2014, the state board shall do the following: (A) Approve all, or a portion, of the list of supplemental instructional materials proposed by the department, taking into consideration the review of the content review experts and any other relevant information, as appropriate. (B) Reject all, or a portion, of the list of supplemental instructional materials proposed by the department, taking into consideration the review of the content review experts and any other relevant information, as appropriate. (2) If the state board rejects all, or a portion, of the list of supplemental instructional materials proposed by the department, or adds an item to the list, the state board, in a public meeting held pursuant to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), shall provide written reasons for the removal or addition of an item on the list. The state board shall not approve a supplemental instructional material it adds to the list at the same time it provides its written reason for adding the material; instead, the state board shall approve the added material at a subsequent public meeting. (e) (1) The governing board of a school district and a county board of education may approve supplemental instructional materials other than those approved by the state board pursuant to subdivision (d) if the governing board of a school district or county board of education determines that other supplemental instructional materials are aligned with the revised English language development standards adopted pursuant to Section 60811.3 and meet the needs of pupils of the district who are English learners. The governing board of a school district or the county board of education may only approve supplemental instructional materials that comply with all of the following: (A) The evaluation criteria approved pursuant to subdivision (a). (B) Section 60226. (C) Subdivision (h). (D) Article 4 (commencing with Section 60060) of Chapter 1. (2) (A) A supplemental instructional material approved by a governing board of a school district or county board of education pursuant to this subdivision that is in the subject area of English language development shall be reviewed by content review experts chosen by the governing board. (B) The majority of the content review experts chosen pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be elementary and secondary schoolteachers who are credentialed in English language arts, possess the appropriate state English learner authorization, and have five years of classroom experience instructing English learners. (C) The content review experts also shall include appropriate persons possessing English learner expertise from postsecondary educational institutions and school and school district curriculum administrators possessing English learner expertise, and other persons who are knowledgeable in English language arts and English language development. (f) Publishers choosing to submit supplemental instructional materials for approval by the state board shall submit standards maps. (g) (1) Before approving supplemental instructional materials pursuant to this section, the state board shall review those instructional materials for academic content, social content, and instructional support to teachers and pupils. Supplemental instructional materials approved by the state board pursuant to this section shall meet required program criteria for grade-level programs and shall include materials for use by teachers. (2) Before approving supplemental instructional materials pursuant to this section, the governing board of a school district or county board of education shall review those instructional materials for academic content and instructional support to teachers and pupils who are English learners. Supplemental instructional materials approved by the governing board of a school district or county board of education pursuant to this section shall meet required program criteria for grade-level programs and shall include materials for use by teachers. (h) Supplemental instructional materials approved pursuant to this section shall comply with the social content review requirements pursuant to Section 60050. (i) The department shall maintain on its Internet Web site the list of supplemental instructional materials approved by the state board pursuant to subdivision (d). (j) This section shall become inoperative on July 1, 2014, and, as of July 1, 2015, is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that becomes operative on or before July 1, 2015, deletes or extends the dates on which it becomes inoperative and is repealed. SEC. 3. Section 60605.88 is added to the Education Code, to read: 60605.88. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, and on a one-time basis, the department, at least 30 days before the state board takes action pursuant to subdivision (c), shall develop a list of supplemental instructional materials for use in kindergarten and grades 1 to 7, inclusive, that are aligned with the California common core academic content standards for mathematics. The supplemental instructional materials shall provide a bridge between the California common core academic content standards and the standards-aligned instructional materials currently being used by local educational agencies. (b) (1) The department shall recommend, and the state board shall approve, content review experts to review, in an open and transparent process, supplemental instructional materials submitted for approval in the subject area of mathematics. (2) The majority of content review experts approved pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be elementary and secondary schoolteachers who are credentialed in the subject area they are reviewing. The content review experts shall also include appropriate persons from postsecondary educational institutions and school and school district curriculum administrators, and other persons who are knowledgeable in the appropriate subject area. (3) The review of supplemental instructional materials described in this section shall be in addition to the review of supplemental instructional materials conducted pursuant to Section 60605.86 and shall be open to publishers and manufacturers of supplemental instructional materials in mathematics that previously submitted supplemental instructional materials pursuant to Section 60605.86 that supplement any mathematics program that is not a current state-adopted program. The review shall be based upon the evaluation criteria approved by the state board pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 60605.86. (c) (1) On or before July 30, 2013, the state board shall do all of the following: (A) Approve all, or a portion, of the list of supplemental instructional materials proposed by the department, taking into consideration the review of the content review experts and any other relevant information, as appropriate. (B) Reject all, or a portion, of the list of supplemental instructional materials proposed by the department, taking into consideration the review of the content review experts and any other relevant information, as appropriate. (2) The state board may add an item to the list of supplemental instructional materials proposed by the department. (3) If the state board rejects all, or a portion, of the list of supplemental instructional materials proposed by the department, or adds an item to the list, the state board, in a public meeting held pursuant to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code), shall provide written reasons for the removal or addition of an item on the list. The state board shall not approve a supplemental instructional material it adds to the list at the same time it provides its written reason for adding the material; instead, the state board shall approve the added material at a subsequent public meeting. If the state board modifies the recommendations proposed by the department, it shall act at its next scheduled meeting or within 60 days of July 30, 2013. (d) Publishers and manufacturers choosing to submit supplemental instructional materials for approval by the state board shall submit standards maps. (e) Before approving supplemental instructional materials pursuant to this section, the state board shall review those instructional materials for academic content, social content, and instructional support to teachers and pupils. Supplemental instructional materials approved by the state board pursuant to this section shall meet required program criteria for grade-level programs and English learners and shall include materials for use by teachers. (f) The department shall maintain on its Internet Web site the list of supplemental instructional materials approved by the state board pursuant to subdivision (c). (g) The department shall use federal carryover funds received pursuant to Title I of the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 et seq.) to implement this section. (h) This section shall become inoperative on July 1, 2014, and, as of January 1, 2015, is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that becomes operative on or before January 1, 2015, deletes or extends the dates on which it becomes inoperative and is repealed. SEC. 4. The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) in one-time federal carryover funds received pursuant to Title I of the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 et seq.) is hereby appropriated from the Federal Trust Fund to the State Department of Education for purposes of conducting a review of English language development supplemental instructional materials pursuant to Section 60605.87 of the Education Code. SEC. 5. This act shall become operative only if Assembly Bill 1246 of the 2011-12 Regular Session is enacted and becomes operative.