BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1757
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1757 (Fletcher)
          As Amended April 11, 2012
          Majority vote 

           JUDICIARY           10-0        APPROPRIATIONS      17-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Feuer, Wagner, Atkins,    |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |
          |     |Dickinson, Gorell, Huber, |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |
          |     |Jones, Monning,           |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |
          |     |Wieckowski, Alejo         |     |Davis, Donnelly, Gatto,   |
          |     |                          |     |Hall, Hill, Lara,         |
          |     |                          |     |Mitchell, Nielsen, Norby, |
          |     |                          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Makes changes to adoption and guardianship processes.  
          Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Allows, in a stepparent adoption, a licensed clinical social 
            worker or marriage and family therapist who is performing the 
            investigation for the stepparent adoption to also help identify 
            the child's natural father.

          2)Deletes Family Code provisions providing for a process to 
            terminate parental rights for dependent children, which have 
            since been superseded by the Welfare and Institutions Code.

          3)Clarifies the timelines for setting initial hearings and 
            contested trials in cases involving termination of parental 
            rights of presumed fathers and mothers by requiring that a 
            proceeding to declare a child free from parental custody and 
            control be set for hearing not more than 45 days after filing of 
            the petition.  Allows a court to issue an order based on the 
            pleading if no interested person contests the petition.  If an 
            interested person contests the petition, requires the court to 
            set the matter for trial.  Requires the party or attorney serving 
            the citation issuing from the petition to do so in a timely 
            manner to maximize response time of the party being served.

          4)Allows birth parents utilizing an agency for an adoption to waive 
            their right to revoke relinquishment of their child for adoption, 
            just as birth parents going through an independent adoption may 







                                                                  AB 1757
                                                                  Page  2


            now do.

          5)Provides that the appropriate venue for an adoption petition to 
            be filed on behalf of a nondependent minor is the court in the 
            county where one of the following exists:

             a)   The petitioner resides;


             b)   The child was born or resides;


             c)   An office of the agency that placed the child is located;


              d)    An office of the department or public agency that is 
                investigating the adoption is located;


              e)    The birth parents resided at the time they agreed to the 
                adoption or when the petition was filed; or,


             f)   The child was freed for adoption.

          6)Requires, in a probate guardianship proceeding, the court 
            investigator, unless waived by the court, to investigate every 
            proposed guardianship and report recommendations to the court.  
            Requires the report to be made available to all parties at least 
            three days before the guardianship hearing.  

          7)Allows the court to refer any case of possible child abuse or 
            neglect to the child welfare agency.  Allows the court, pending 
            completion of the child welfare investigation, to take any 
            reasonable steps to protect the child's safety.  Stays the 
            guardianship case if dependency proceedings are initiated.  
            Requires any recommendation regarding commencing a guardianship 
            proceeding made by the child welfare social worker to be provided 
            to the person requesting the dependency investigation.  

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Requires, in a proceeding to terminate parental rights as part of 
            an adoption proceeding, that efforts be made to identify the 
            natural father and report that information to the court.  In the 







                                                                  AB 1757
                                                                  Page  3


            case of a step-parent adoption, allows the board of supervisors 
            to determine who should attempt to identify the father, as 
            specified.  

          2)Provides a process for terminating the parental rights of 
            dependent children.  

          3)Provides that a proceeding to declare a child free from parental 
            custody and control be set for hearing not more than 45 days 
            after filing of the petition and completion of service of 
            process.  

          4)Provides that a birth parent may waive the right to revoke 
            consent to an independent adoption by signing the waiver in the 
            presence of:  a) a representative of the Department of Social 
            Services (DSS) or the delegated county adoption agency; b) a 
            judicial officer if the birth parent is represented by 
            independent legal counsel; or, c) an adoption service provider if 
            the birth parent is represented by independent legal counsel, as 
            provided.  

          5)Provides that a resident of California may file an adoption 
            petition in the county where any of the following exists, while a 
            nonresident may file the petition anywhere, except a), below:

             a)   The petitioner resides;


             b)   The child was born or resides;


             c)   An office of the agency that placed the child is located; 
               or,


              d)    An office of the department or public agency that is 
                investigating the adoption is located.  

          6)Provides that a court investigator may conduct an investigation 
            as part of a guardianship proceeding and report to the court, 
            unless waived by the court.  Requires the court to read and 
            consider such report before ruling on the guardianship petition.  
            If the investigation alleges that the child's parent is unfit, 
            requires the case to be referred to the child welfare agency for 
            investigation and stays guardianship proceedings until completion 







                                                                  AB 1757
                                                                  Page  4


            of that investigation.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:

          1)As this legislation is primarily clarifying, there are no new 
            costs for the courts. 

          2)Costs for the county child welfare departments should be minor 
            and absorbable within existing resources. 

           COMMENTS  :  This is the Academy of California Adoption Lawyers' 
          annual adoption bill.  In support of the bill, the author writes:

               ÝThe bill] is a consensus-driven measure that has been 
               circulated among stakeholders in the adoption community 
               as they identify statutes that require clarification or 
               consolidation.  Laws that govern adoption processes are 
               spread throughout the Family Code, Welfare & Institutions 
               Code, and Probate Code.  As these code sections are 
               gradually amended, they may often conflict with other 
               sections, resulting in contradictory provisions.  Such 
               convoluted laws are often misinterpreted and misapplied 
               in judicial procedures, presenting unnecessary and costly 
               hurdles to parents that would like to adopt.  This bill 
               reconciles the various inconsistencies in statute to 
               clarify adoption law and streamline adoption processes.  
               By doing so, we make it easier for California's children 
               to be placed in permanent, stable homes with loving 
               parents.

          The key provision of this bill clarifies the law regarding children 
          who are both the subject of a guardianship petition and may qualify 
          as a dependent after a recent appellate case.  In Christian G. 
          (2011) 195 Cal. App. 4th 581, a trial court appointed a boy's uncle 
          as his guardian after an investigation revealed that the boy's 
          father was unable to care for him adequately.  The court of appeals 
          reversed the appointment, finding that the probate court should 
          instead have referred the case to the child welfare agency for a 
          dependency investigation under a Probate Code section which 
          requires that if a party alleges that the child's parent is unfit, 
          the case must be referred to the child welfare agency for 
          investigation and the guardianship case must be stayed pending that 
          investigation.  

          As a result of Christian G., the bill's sponsor states that already 







                                                                  AB 1757
                                                                  Page  5


          overburdened child welfare agencies have been deluged with cases 
          for investigation, particularly for less egregious cases that 
          warrant some intervention, but not necessarily full involvement by 
          the dependency court.  This bill seeks to ensure that probate court 
          judges have the discretion they need to protect children from harm, 
          but enough flexibility to also be able to take appropriate action 
          in cases when warranted, by allowing the probate court, if it deems 
          appropriate, to refer any case of possible child abuse or neglect 
          to the child welfare agency.  While the child welfare investigation 
          is pending, the court can take any reasonable steps to protect the 
          child's safety.  The guardianship case is then appropriately stayed 
          if dependency proceedings are initiated.  

          Another provision of the bill allows birth parents using an agency 
          for the adoption to waive their right to revoke consent for the 
          adoption and reach closure quicker.  The proposed law provides the 
          same protections currently afforded to birth parents undergoing an 
          independent adoption including limiting who may accept the waiver, 
          specifying the warnings that must be provided to the birth parents 
          as part of the waiver process and in some cases, requiring that 
          independent counsel advise the birth parents as to their rights.


           Analysis Prepared by  :  Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 


                                                                   FN: 0003508