BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1875 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 1875 (Gatto) As Amended May 30, 2012 Majority vote JUDICIARY 7-3 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Ayes:|Feuer, Atkins, Dickinson, | | | | |Huber, Monning, | | | | |Wieckowski, Chesbro | | | | | | | | |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------| |Nays:|Wagner, Gorell, Jones | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY : Limits a civil deposition of any person to one day of seven hours, except as specified. Specifically this bill : 1)Provides, unless ordered by the court, that a deposition in a civil case shall be limited to one day of seven hours. Specifies that the court shall allow additional time if needed to fairly examine the deponent or if the deponent, another person, or any other circumstance impedes or delays the examination. 2)Specifies that the limitation described above shall not apply under any of the following circumstances: a) If the parties have stipulated that the provisions of this bill will not apply to a specific deposition or to the entire proceeding; b) To any deposition of an expert witnesses, as defined; and, c) To any case designated a complex case, as defined in the California Rules of Court, if that case has more than five defendants. EXISTING LAW : 1)Permits a party to a civil action to take an oral deposition of any person, including other parties to the action, upon AB 1875 Page 2 service of a proper notice indicating the date, time, and location of the deposition, as well as notice of any materials that must be produced at the deposition. 2)Permits any party or deponent, at any time before, during, or after a deposition, to seek an order from the court protecting the deponent from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, or undue burden or expense, and authorizes a deposition officer to suspend the taking of testimony to enable the party or deponent to move for such protective order. Specifies that the protective order may impose certain conditions or limitations on the deposition, including an order that the deposition be terminated or not taken at all. 3)Provides, under federal rules, that unless otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a deposition is limited to one day of seven hours. Specifies that a federal court may allow additional time if needed to fairly examine the deponent or if the deponent, another person, or any other circumstance impedes or delays the examination. FISCAL EFFECT : None COMMENTS : Existing law allows a party to a civil action to take an oral deposition of any person, including another party or the other party's witness, as part of the pre-trial civil discovery process. This testimony is reduced to writing for purposes of preparing for trial or, under some circumstances, for use at trial. California's Civil Discovery Act sets forth a number of rules governing the means and times for notifying deponents and the manner in which depositions must be conducted. In many ways California law parallels the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on these matters. For example, both federal rules and state law permit a deponent or party to seek a protective order terminating the deposition if it becomes overly oppressive or burdensome. However, while the federal rules presumptively limit depositions to one day of seven hours per deponent - unless circumstances warrant additional time or the parties stipulate otherwise - California law contains no such limitation. According to the author and supporters of this bill, the lack of any limitation in state law has led to needlessly long and repetitive questioning of deponents, for apparently no other purpose than to delay the proceeding or to discourage a plaintiff from proceeding with a suit. AB 1875 Page 3 This bill, therefore, would adopt a variation of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by limiting a civil deposition, as a general rule, to one day of seven hours, unless the court orders additional time as needed. This bill also specifies that this seven hour rule would not apply if parties stipulate otherwise. Unlike the federal rule, this bill adds two additional exceptions: the seven hour limitation will not apply to: 1) any deposition of an expert witness; or, 2) any case designated as "complex," as defined in the California Rules of Court, if that case has more than five defendants. By adopting the federal rule that a deposition shall be limited to seven hours unless otherwise stipulated or ordered, this bill effectively reverses the presumption in existing state law. Under existing law, that is, there is no limitation on the length of a deposition unless the parties stipulate to limitations or the court orders a limitation. This bill, on the other hand, would begin with the presumption that a deposition is limited to seven hours unless the parties stipulate otherwise or the court orders an extension. Supporters contend that this bill merely adopts the federal rule, and that if the rule is workable in the federal courts then it will also work in the state courts. There is some justification for this position. Federal courts, after all, handle litigation every bit as complex as litigation handled in California courts. There are also important differences between state and federal courts, some of which may argue for a greater presumptive limits on the length of depositions in state court and some of which may cut the other way. These differences include case volume and court resources, the general type and complexity of the issues in many cases, practice styles of counsel, rules of procedure, court "cultures," and the availability of judicial supervision. Analysis Prepared by : Thomas Clark / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 FN: 0003976