BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1951
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 9, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 1951 (Atkins) - As Amended:  April 16, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                              Housing and 
          Community Development                         Vote: 5-1

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill eliminates programs that are part of the Affordable 
          Housing Innovation Fund created by Proposition 1C, the Housing 
          and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2006, and reallocates 
          the funds.   Specifically, this bill:  

          1)Repeals the practitioner fund administered by the Department 
            of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and eliminates the 
            $25 million appropriated to that fund. 

          2)Repeals the construction liability insurance reform pilot 
            program administered by HCD and eliminates the $5 million 
            appropriated to that program.

          3)Requires HCD to make the $30 million available from the 
            eliminated programs within the Affordable Housing Innovation 
            Fund for the Multifamily Housing Program (MHP).  

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Redirects $30 million in voter-approved bond funds.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose.   The author notes Proposition 1C authorized the 
            creation of the Affordable Housing Innovation Fund but 
            required the Legislature to develop programs to spend the 
            funds with some parameters.  With limited resources available, 
            the author argues it is important to move funds into MHP where 
            they can make a greater impact in solving California's ongoing 
            housing crisis, while still retaining the intent of the 








                                                                  AB 1951
                                                                  Page  2

            voters.  The author also argues that bond funds are close to 
            exhausted and the likelihood of another bond measure to 
            replenish the coffers is limited.   In addition, the 
            dissolution of redevelopment agencies eliminated the Low- and 
            Moderate-Income Housing Fund as a source of funding for 
            affordable housing.

           2)Background.   Proposition 1C:  Housing and Emergency Shelter 
            Trust Fund Act of 2006 authorized the creation of the 
            Affordable Housing Innovation Fund and transferred $100 
            million to the Fund.  The bond act required funds be spent for 
            competitive grants or loans to sponsoring entities that 
            develop, own, lend or invest in affordable housing through 
            pilot programs that demonstrate innovate approaches to 
            creating or preserving affordable housing.  The bond act 
            required these programs be created statutorily through 2/3 
            vote bills. Any funds that were not spent within 30 months of 
            being offered through the programs would revert to the 
            self-help housing fund.

            Proposition 1C also authorized $195 million of for the MHP 
            program which funds the production or rehabilitation of 
            affordable rental housing.  MHP is the most popular program 
            offered by HCD and has been significantly oversubscribed in 
            past years.  There is no money left in MHP.

           3)Existing programs .  The practitioner fund and the construction 
            liability insurance reform pilot program have not proven to be 
            workable.  The contraction in the housing market that began 
            accelerating shortly after the programs were established saw 
            developers turn their focus more on finding construction 
            funding than accessing the practitioner fund to purchase 
            property for future development.  Similarly, the $5 million 
            allocated to the construction liability insurance reform pilot 
            program proved insufficient to fund a viable pilot program. 

           4)Previous legislation  .  SB 586 (Dutton), Chapter 652, Statutes 
            of 2007, created several new programs funded by the affordable 
            housing innovation fund including the practitioner fund and 
            the construction liability insurance reform pilot program.  




           Analysis Prepared by  :    Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081 








                                                                  AB 1951
                                                                  Page  3