BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 1990
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 23, 2012

                    ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE
                               Steven Bradford, Chair
                     AB 1990 (Fong) - As Amended:  March 29, 2012
           
          SUBJECT  :   Renewable energy resources: small-scale renewable 
          generation program.

           SUMMARY  :   Establishes a small-scale renewable generation 
          program in the state's most impacted and disadvantaged 
          communities.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Establishes a small-scale renewable generation program with 
            the goal of installing 375 megawatts of electrical in most 
            impacted and disadvantaged communities in the state.

          2)Limits per project size to 500 kW.

          3)Requires the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC), in 
            consultation with interested stakeholders, to develop program 
            elements that achieve certain environmental justice 
            objectives. 

          4)Requires investor-owned utilities (IOUs) to file a standard 
            tariff for electricity purchased pursuant to a clean energy 
            contract with a small-scale renewable generation facility 
            owner or operator.

          5)Requires the PUC to establish a schedule of standard rates for 
            electricity that IOUs are required to purchase through clean 
            energy contracts with a small-scale renewable generation 
            facility owner or operator.

          6)Requires the PUC to establish a rate of $0.02/kilowatt-hour 
            for the value of environmental justice and set various rates 
            for specific project attributes: type of service provided 
            (peaking, base load, as available), size range, and benefits 
            of the program.

          7)Allows the PUC to provide separate rates for developers who 
            cannot use federal tax credit benefits.

          8)Requires local publicly owned electric utilities to establish 
            a schedule of standard tariff rates for electricity purchased 








                                                                  AB 1990
                                                                  Page  2

            through clean energy contracts from small-scale renewable 
            generation facilities pursuant to a small-scale generation 
            program for the utility. 

          9)Requires the PUC to allocate procurement targets for each 
            electrical corporation and local publicly owned electric 
            utility in proportion to each utility's percentage share of 
            the state's total electricity sales.

          10)Limits the cost of the program to no more than 0.375 percent 
            of the total cost of each IOUs forecast retail sales for 2020.

          11)Requires the PUC to require IOUs to begin offering these 
            contracts by January 1, 2014.

          12)Requires the PUC to post maps of publicly owned utility's

          EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Requires all investor-owned utilities (IOUs) and 
            publicly-owned utilities (POUs), that serve more than 75,000 
            retail customers, to develop a standard contract or tariff 
            (aka feed-in-tariff or FIT) available for renewable energy 
            facilities up to three megawatts (MWs).  Statewide 
            participation is capped at 750 MWs. 

          2)Requires the FIT contract price for IOUs to include all 
            current and anticipated environmental compliance costs, 
            including but not limited to, mitigation of emissions of 
            greenhouse gases and air pollution offsets associated with the 
            operation of new generating facilities in the local air 
            pollution control or air quality management district where the 
            electric generation facility is located.

          3)Requires the contract price for electricity purchased through 
            a FIT, adopted by specified POUs, include the value of avoided 
            costs of distribution and transmission upgrades, the offset of 
            peak demand and all current and anticipated environmental and 
            greenhouse gas reduction compliance costs and avoided costs.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "California's most 
          vulnerable communities - those that have suffered first and 
          worst from pollution - have not benefited much from renewable 








                                                                  AB 1990
                                                                  Page  3

          energy policy.  This legislation will create jobs and build 
          cleaner, safer, and healthier neighborhoods. This bill 
          establishes a FIT for small scale renewable energy projects of 
          up to 500 kilowatts to spur rooftop solar on commercial 
          buildings including multifamily buildings, and residential 
          buildings and to create local green jobs in disadvantaged 
          communities with high unemployment.

          This bill also fills a gap in the green economy where the most 
          impacted and disadvantaged communities rarely see renewable 
          energy systems in local communities and who undergo green jobs 
          training programs, yet often cannot access green jobs."

           1)Background:   A feed in tariff is jargon that means a standard 
            power purchase 
          contract, over a standard period of time, with a standard 
          payment for each kilowatthour of electricity produced over the 
          life of the contract. What makes a feed in tariff unusual from 
          other types of power purchase contracts is that any project 
          owner or developer can use this contract to enter into an 
          agreement with a utility because the terms of the contract and 
          the price are known in advance. This standard form of the 
          contract allows an owner or a developer to determine the revenue 
          stream from the project ahead of time. Most power contracts 
          negotiate the terms and the price or have limiting criteria that 
          prevent owners or developers from placing bids to provide power.

           2)Distributed generation programs  : The PUC is currently in 
            charge of several programs to
          encourage greater levels of distributed generation. These 
          include the 3MW FIT that was authorized by SB 32 
          (Negrete-McLeod, Chapter 328, Statutes of 2009) which is not yet 
          available, the Reverse Auction Mechanism (RAM), the California 
          Solar Initiative, Self Generation Incentive Program (SGIP), Net 
          Metering, Virtual Net Metering, Solar PV programs at SCE and 
          PG&E, and the interconnection rule known as Rule 21.

          The SB 32 FIT may preclude small generator projects due to the 
          complexity of the proposed contract. Small generators may not 
          have the possible revenue associated with a small project to 
          afford the extensive requirements associated with this FIT.  As 
          a result, the SB 32 FIT may be easier for larger developers who 
          cannot effectively compete to build projects through the other 
          programs. The RAM is a low-bid wins auction that is administered 
          by the IOUs. Restrictions on eligibility limit the number of 








                                                                  AB 1990
                                                                  Page  4

          bidders. The California Solar Initiative and the SGIP is for 
          self-generation only that is not wholesale sale of electricity. 
          Both of these programs have restrictions on the size of the 
          project.

          As a result, there may be limitations on the structure of the 
          available programs that prevent these projects from being 
          constructed. Yet, small projects in a load center are also 
          recognized to have a potential to have a higher value, as 
          described in a recently published PUC consultant report:

               "Local distributed photovoltaics (LDPV) is defined as 
               photovoltaics (PV) sized such that its output will be 
               consumed by load on the feeder or substation where it is 
               interconnected. This distinguishes LDPV from other 
               characterizations of "distributed PV," which has typically 
               been defined as 20 MW or less. We focus the study on local 
               distributed PV because compared to distributed PV that is 
               located remotely from load, local PV has the potential for 
               less expensive and faster interconnection. In addition, it 
               may target higher value locations on the grid, and may 
               better achieve other policy goals such as reducing 
               environmental impact, creating local jobs, enhancing energy 
               awareness, and promoting redevelopment. In contrast, some 
               distributed systems of 20 MW or less that are not "local" 
               may export power to serve remote loads without providing 
               these advantages."

           3)Suggested amendments  : This bill requires the PUC to authorize 
            a $0.02/kilowatthour rate for
          environmental justice. It is not clear how this rate was 
          determined.  The author may wish to consider amending the bill to 
          remove this provision.  

          This bill requires the PUC to determine allocation of the 375 
          MWs for this FIT among both IOUs and POUs.  The author may wish 
          to modify this to allocate the MWs proportionally among the IOUs 
          and POUs to base the allocation on statewide total peak demand, 
          as follows:  

          The proportionate share shall be calculated based on the ratio 
          of the electrical corporation's peak demand compared to the 
          total statewide peak demand.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   








                                                                  AB 1990
                                                                  Page  5


           Support 
           
          Asian & Pacific Islanders California Action Network (APIsCAN)
          Asian and Pacific Islander Obesity Prevention Alliance (APIOPA)
          Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice (ACRJ)
          Asian Immigrant Women Advocates (AIWA)
          Asian Law Caucus
          Asian Neighborhood Design
          Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC)
          Asian Pacific Environmental Network (APEN)
          Asian Pacific Policy & Planning Council (A3PCON)
          Association of Irritated Residents (AIR)
          Bus Riders Union
          California Environmental Justice Alliance (CEJA)
          California Healthy Nail salon Collaborative (Collaborative)
          California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation (CRLAF)
          Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc. (CARE)
          Center for Biological Diversity
          Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice (CCAEJ)
          Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment
          Chinese for Affirmative Action (CAA)
          Chinese Progressive Association (CPA)
          City Heights Community Development Corporation (CHCDC)
          Clean Coalition 
          Comite Rosas
          Committee For a Better Arvin
          Committee For a Better Shafter
          Communities for a Better Environment (CBE)
          Communities for Clean Ports
          Community Health for Asian Americans
          Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, Green-Collar Jobs Campaign
          EndOil
          Environment California 
          Environmental Health Coalition 
          Environmental Justice Task Force of A3PCON
          Equal Action
          Filipino Advocates for Justice 
          Filipino/American Coalition for Environmental Solidarity (FACES)
          Fresno Center for New Americans 
          Fresno Metro Ministry 
          Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives
          Global Green USA
          Great Leap, Inc.
          Helping Hand Tools








                                                                  AB 1990
                                                                  Page  6

          Khmer Girls in Action 
          Korean Resource Center (KRC)
          Koreatown Immigrant Workers Alliance
          Lao Iu Mien Culture Association, Inc. (LIMCA)
          Lao Khmu Association, Inc. (LKA)
          Little Tokyo Service Center
          Los Angeles Business Council (LABC)
          Merced Lao Family Community, Inc. 
          Movement Generation: Justice & Ecology Project
          Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
          P  "  
          Pacific Asian Consortium in Employment (PACE)
          Pacific Environment 
          Pacific Isle Environment Reserve (PIER)
          People Organizing to demand Environmental and Economic Rights 
          (PODER)
          People's Community Organization for Reform and Empowerment 
          (People's CORE)
          RYSE Youth Center
          San Diego Coastkeeper
          San Francisco Baykeeper 
          Search To Involve Pilipino Americans (SIPA)
          Sierra Club California
          Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (SVPC)
          Solaria
          Southeast Asian Assistance Center (SAAC)
          Students for Economic and Environmental Justice, UC Berkeley 
          School of Law
          To'utupu 'oe 'Otu Felenite (TOFA, Inc.)
          Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS)
          Vote Solar Initiative 

           Opposition 
           
          Southern California Edison (SCE)
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Susan Kateley / U. & C. / (916) 
          319-2083