BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2040 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 18, 2012 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Felipe Fuentes, Chair AB 2040 (Swanson) - As Introduced: February 23, 2012 Policy Committee: Public SafetyVote: 4-2 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: SUMMARY This bill: 1)Provides that a person adjudicated a ward of the court for an offense involving an act of prostitution, may upon reaching 18 years of age, petition the court to have his or her record sealed without showing that he or she has not been convicted of a subsequent felony or of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, or that rehabilitation has been attained to the satisfaction of the court, as required by current law. 2)Provides that a person who was 18 or older at the time of an offense involving prostitution, or a person who was under 18 but tried as an adult for an offense involving prostitution, may petition the court to withdraw his or her guilty plea, and requires the court to grant the petition if the court finds the petitioner has made a satisfactory showing that the violation was a result of the petitioner being a victim of human trafficking, as specified. 3)Specifies that the provisions of this bill apply retroactively. 4)Specifies this bill does not authorize sealing any record unrelated to an act of prostitution. FISCAL EFFECT Based on about 9,000 misdemeanor adult dispositions for prostitution statewide, if 5% pursued such a petition, with an average of one hours of court time per case, the annual GF cost AB 2040 Page 2 to the state trial courts would be about $225,000. Assuming a 90% smaller universe of juvenile petitions for prostitution, if 25% of these petitions resulted in wardship dispositions, and half of these dispositions resulted in petitions for relief, with an average of one hour of court time per hearing, the annual GF cost to the state trial courts would be about $100,000. COMMENTS 1)Rationale . The author and proponents contend that current law relating to record-sealing and expungement does not sufficiently address the special circumstances of human trafficking, and that prostitution merits a special statute. According to the author, "Victims of human trafficking are often forced into prostitution and other crimes against their will. When these victims try to leave the sex trade, their criminal records often follow them, limiting their employment and housing opportunities and making it difficult for them to integrate back into society and a safe environment?. "AB 2040 assists persons who were victims of human trafficking in two significant ways: 1) With respect to record sealing, AB 2040 deletes the requirement that a petitioner show the he or she has not been subsequently convicted of a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude or that rehabilitation has been attained. Rehabilitation is an impossible legal hurdle to prove for someone whose crime was caused by their commercial sexual exploitation. By deleting the rehabilitation requirement, AB 2040 makes it easier for those victims to get their juvenile records sealed. 2) With respect to petitions to withdraw pleas and set aside convictions, AB 2040 would require a court to grant the petition for setting aside certain convictions for prostitution if the petitioner has demonstrated that the violation was a result of the petitioner having been a victim of human trafficking." 2)Is there a need for a special record-sealing procedure for prostitution? As noted in the Assembly Public Safety analysis of this bill, current statute provides sealing and expungement relief to juveniles adjudicated for most offenses and adults convicted of most misdemeanors, including prostitution. For offenses committed as a juvenile, the petitioner may have his AB 2040 Page 3 or her record sealed upon reaching 18 years of age if he or she has not been subsequently convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, and if the court is satisfied that the petitioner has been rehabilitated. In addition, an offender may file a petition any time before reaching the age of 21 to dismiss the petition if the court finds that the interests of justice and the welfare of the minor require such dismissal, or if it finds that the minor is not in need of treatment or rehabilitation. For misdemeanor offenses committed as an adult, the offender may have his or her conviction set aside or dismissed upon a showing the petitioner has completed probation, is not serving a sentence for any other offense, is not on probation for any other offense, and is not being charged with any other offense. Is there a need to create a special sealing or expunging procedure for prostitution offenses when relief is already available under existing law? Is it good policy to grant a petitioner relief without requiring a showing of rehabilitation, completion of probation, or that the petitioner is not continuing to engage in acts of prostitution or other criminal acts? 3)Opposition . According to the California District Attorneys Association, "This bill would effectively negate the requirements of existing law that a convicted person complete any punishment and/or supervision and refrain from future criminal acts in order to qualify for expungement relief.... "We do not deny the pernicious effects of human trafficking, but the bottom line is that adults who commit crimes face consequences. Existing law provides a procedure to expunge certain offenses and we feel it is unnecessary to create a special process for one class of offenses and one class of offenders." Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081