BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2060 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 16, 2012 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Felipe Fuentes, Chair AB 2060 (Bonilla) - As Amended: April 30, 2012 Policy Committee: Judiciary Vote:10 - 0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: Yes SUMMARY This bill codifies current court procedures as they pertain to the appointment of a responsible adult authorized to make educational decisions for a child under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires the court, when it limits a parent's educational rights, to determine whether there is a responsible adult, who is a relative, non-relative extended family member or other adult known to the child who is willing and able to serve as the child's educational representative. 2)Provides that, if an educational representative or surrogate is appointed for the child, the representative or surrogate must meet with the child, investigate the child's educational needs and determine whether those needs are being met, and, prior to each review hearing, provide information and recommendations concerning the child's educational needs to the social worker or probation officer, make written recommendations to the court and participate in those portions of the review hearing that concern the child's education. FISCAL EFFECT This bill establishes in statute the process that judges are currently following under existing law, based on prior statute and precedent. Therefore, there are no costs associated with this legislation. COMMENTS AB 2060 Page 2 Rationale . This bill, sponsored by Public Council, Children's Rights Project, is intended to ensure the continuity and accessibility of educational services for students involved with the juvenile court. The juvenile court seeks to protect the safety and wellbeing of children who are at risk of, or have experienced abuse or neglect. The courts' responsibilities include meeting the child's educational needs and goals. When the parents of children under the supervision of the juvenile court are found by the court to be unsuitable to make educational decisions on behalf of their children, the court may appoint a responsible adult to serve as the child's "education rights holder." This bill simply places current practice into statute to ensure uniformity. Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916) 319-2081