BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 2126
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2126 (Block)
          As Introduced  February 23, 2012
          Majority vote 

           HIGHER EDUCATION    9-0         APPROPRIATIONS      15-2        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Block, Olsen, Achadjian,  |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |
          |     |Brownley, Fong, Galgiani, |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |
          |     |Lara, Miller, Portantino  |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |
          |     |                          |     |Davis, Donnelly, Gatto,   |
          |     |                          |     |Hall, Hill, Lara,         |
          |     |                          |     |Mitchell, Norby, Solorio  |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |Nays:|Nielsen, Wagner           |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :   Deletes the sunset date for provisions governing the 
          adoption, amendment, or repeal of regulations by the California 
          State University (CSU) Trustees.  

          EXISTING LAW  establishes procedures for the adoption, amendment 
          or repeal of regulations by the CSU Trustees, rather than the 
          process set forth in the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), 
          until January 1, 2013.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, ongoing administrative cost savings to CSU for 
          continued use of the existing process for adopting regulations, 
          which do not require outside review by the Office of 
          Administrative Law (OAL) pursuant to the APA.

           COMMENTS  :  Prior to the enactment of AB 3132 (Firestone), 
          Chapter 938, Statutes of 1996, CSU was required to follow the 
          APA when promulgating rules and regulations, which required 
          review of all proposed regulations to be completed by OAL.  With 
          the enactment of AB 3132, the CSU Trustees were authorized to 
          streamline many operations, including promulgating regulations, 
          without having to utilize the procedures outlined in the APA.  
          Under the authority provided in AB 3132, the CSU Office of 
          General Counsel (OGC) is charged with performing a review 
          similar to that previously performed by OAL.  This authority was 








                                                                  AB 2126
                                                                  Page  2


          granted for an initial period of five years and has since been 
          extended by several statutes.  Current law, enacted by AB 262 
          (Coto), Chapter 679, Statutes of 2007, extends this authority 
          until January 1, 2013.  This bill would remove the sunset date, 
          thereby allowing the CSU Trustees to continue the process of 
          adopting regulations through the CSU OGC indefinitely.  The 
          author notes that CSU has received no complaints about the 
          current process despite enacting, repealing, or modifying 68 
          groups of regulations.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Sandra Fried / HIGHER ED. / (916) 
          319-3960 


                                                                FN: 0003324