BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 2187
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2187 (Bradford)
          As Amended  May 1, 2012
          Majority vote 

           UTILITIES & COMMERCE              13-0              NATURAL 
          RESOURCES               8-0     
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Bradford, Buchanan, Fong, |Ayes:|Chesbro, Knight,          |
          |     |Fuentes, Furutani,        |     |Dickinson, Grove,         |
          |     |Gorell, Roger Hernández,  |     |Halderman, Huffman,       |
          |     |Huffman, Ma, Nestande,    |     |Monning, Skinner          |
          |     |Skinner, Swanson, Valadao |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      17-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |     |                          |
          |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |     |                          |
          |     |Davis, Donnelly, Gatto,   |     |                          |
          |     |Hall, Hill, Lara,         |     |                          |
          |     |Mitchell, Nielsen, Norby, |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :   Allows renewable energy contracts executed after 
          January 13, 2011, to fully count towards the Renewable Portfolio 
          Standard (RPS) mandate.  

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)States the California Renewables Portfolio Standard program 
            requires investor owned utilities, local publicly owned 
            utilities and energy service providers to increase purchases 
            of renewable energy such that at least 33% of retail sales are 
            procured from a renewable energy resource by December 31, 
            2020.

          2)States RPS eligibility requirements are in part determined 








                                                                  AB 2187
                                                                  Page  2


            upon whether the contract for eligible renewable energy 
            resources was executed after June 1, 2010.

           FISCAL EFFECT :   Minor absorbable costs to California Public 
          Utilities Commission (PUC) to modify an existing commission 
          decision.

           COMMENTS  :   According to the author, this bill seeks to change 
          the renewable energy contract "grandfathering" date to coincide 
          with PUC rules that governed RPS program that were in effect 
          through January 13, 2011.

           Background  :  In April 2012, the Legislature passed SB 2 X1 
          (Simitian), Chapter 1, Statutes of
          2011-12 First Extraordinary Session, which recast the state's 
          annual renewable energy goal from 20% to 33% of a retail energy 
          service provider's retail sales.  

          It also conditioned certain eligibility requirements upon 
          whether the contract for electricity products from eligible 
          renewable energy resources was executed after June 1, 2010.

           Compliance gap  :  Prior to the enactment of SB 2 X1, the state 
          set an annual renewable energy
          goal of 20% by December 31, 2010, of a retail energy service 
          provider's retail sales.  Certain energy service providers made 
          a number of renewable energy purchases between October 2010 and 
          January 13, 2011, in an effort to comply with the 20% annual 
          procurement target.  

          Under current law, SB 2 X1 renewable energy contract 
          "grandfathering" date creates a RPS compliance gap whereby 
          retail energy service providers that purchased renewable energy 
          under PUC rules at the time of the contract are now in a 
          situation whereby these purchases may be "stranded" for 
          compliance purposes.  This situation potentially exposes the 
          retail energy service provider to market losses for those 
          purchases and/or the probability for penalties from PUC for RPS 
          noncompliance.  This may be perceived as retail energy service 
          providers being penalized for making renewable energy purchases 
          between June 2010 and January 13, 2011, to meet the state's 
          energy goals which were in accordance with PUC policy at that 
          time.









                                                                  AB 2187
                                                                  Page  3


          This bill modifies the "grandfathering" date for electric 
          service providers only and would require specified restrictions 
          on crediting eligible renewable energy resource electricity 
          products to each compliance period to apply to contracts 
          executed after January 13, 2011.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    DaVina Flemings / U. & C. / (916) 
          319-2083 




                                                                FN: 0003961