BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 2251|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2251
          Author:   Feuer (D), et al.
          Amended:  6/18/12 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  6-0, 6/12/12
          AYES:  Hancock, Anderson, Harman, Liu, Price, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Calderon
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  77-0, 4/16/12 (Consent) - See last page 
            for vote


            SUBJECT  :    Collection of restitution orders from inmates: 
                       payments to victims

           SOURCE  :     Los Angeles County District Attorney
                      Crime Victims Action Alliance


           DIGEST  :    This bill (1) authorizes a district attorney to 
          provide the restitution order for a victim and the victims 
          contact information to the Department of Corrections and 
          Rehabilitation (CDCR) so that restitution collected from an 
          inmate can be paid to the victim through the Victim 
          Compensation and Government Claims Board (VCGCB); (2) 
          conditions the providing of the victim's contact 
          information to CDCR on a finding by the district attorney 
          that doing so is in the best interests of the victim; and 
          (3) provides that consent of the victim is not required in 
          such circumstances.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2251
                                                                Page 
          2

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing provisions in the California 
          Constitution state that all persons who suffer losses as a 
          result of criminal activity shall have the right to 
          restitution from the perpetrators of these crimes.  Where a 
          convicted defendant has been ordered to pay direct 
          restitution to a victim, money collected from the defendant 
          shall be first be applied to satisfy the restitution order. 
           (California Constitution. Article 1 Section 28, subd. 
          (b)(13))

          Existing law states legislative intent that a victim of 
          crime who incurs any economic loss as a result of the 
          commission of a crime shall receive restitution directly 
          from any defendant convicted of that crime.  (Penal Code 
          (PEN) Section 1202.4, subd. (a)(1))

          Existing law directs the court to order a defendant to make 
          restitution to the victim or victims of the defendant's 
          crime.  The court shall order full restitution for the 
          losses caused by the defendant's crime unless the court 
          finds and states compelling and extraordinary reasons for 
          not doing so.  (PEN Section 1202.4, subd. (f))

          Existing law provides that a criminal restitution order 
          shall be enforceable as though it were a civil judgment.  
          (PEN Section 1202.4, subd. (i))

          Existing law creates the Victims of Crime Program, 
          administered by the VCGCB, to reimburse victims of crime 
          for the pecuniary losses they suffer as a direct result of 
          criminal acts.  Indemnification is made from the 
          Restitution Fund (Fund), which is continuously appropriated 
          to the VCGCB.  (Government Code Sections 13950-13968)

          Existing law provides that when a defendant is sentenced to 
          state prison and owes a restitution fine or a restitution 
          order, the CDCR shall deduct 20 to 50% from the prisoner's 
          wages and trust account to satisfy these obligations.  
          These funds shall be transmitted to the VCGCG for direct 
          payment to a victim, for deposit into the Fund for payments 
          to qualifying victims, and to reimburse the VCGCB for 
          payments made to victims.  (PEN Section 2085.5, subd. 
          (a)-(b))








                                                               AB 2251
                                                                Page 
          3

          Existing law provides that where money for victim 
          restitution is transferred from an inmate's trust account 
          to the VCGCB, the restitution shall be paid to the victim, 
          as follows:

             The money shall be paid to the victim within 60 days.

             If the victim cannot be located, the money shall be 
             held in the Fund until the end of the next fiscal year 
             or until the victim has provided current address 
             information.

             Amounts not paid by the end of the following fiscal 
             year shall revert to the Fund.

             After the money has reverted to the Fund, the victim 
             may provide documentation to CDCR.  Upon verification by 
             CDCR that restitution was collected on behalf of the 
             victim, the VCGCB shall transmit the restitution to the 
             victim.  (PEN Section 2085.5, subd. (k))  

          This bill authorizes the district attorney of the county 
          from which the defendant is committed to prison to send the 
          victim's contact information and a copy of the restitution 
          order to CDCR for the sole purpose of payment of 
          restitution collected from an inmate on the victim's behalf 
          if the district attorney finds it is in the best interest 
          of the victim to send that information.  If the victim 
          affirmatively objects, the district attorney shall not send 
          the victim's contact information to the CDCR.  The district 
          attorney shall not be required to inform the victim of the 
          right to object.

          This bill permits this information to be sent without the 
          victim's consent.

           Prior legislation  .  SB 432 (Runner), Chapter 49, Statutes 
          2009.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/18/12)








                                                               AB 2251
                                                                Page 
          4

          Los Angeles County District Attorney (co-source)
          Crime Victims Action Alliance (co-source)
          Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs
          California Correctional Peace Officers Association
          California District Attorneys Association
          California State Sheriffs' Association
          Crime Victims United of California
          Riverside Sheriffs' Association

          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author:

             The California Department of Corrections and 
             Rehabilitation (hereinafter CDCR) collects monies from 
             inmate accounts to pay victims of crime on direct 
             restitution orders and also to repay disbursements from 
             the Victims Compensation Fund back to the Victims 
             Compensation Government Claims Board. Penal Code section 
             1203c(d)(1) states that, "If the victim consents, the 
             probation officer of the county from which the person is 
             committed may send to the Department of Corrections and 
             Rehabilitation the victim's contact information and a 
             copy of the restitution order for the purpose of 
             distributing the restitution collected on behalf of the 
             victim."  The statute is silent as to the ability of 
             prosecutors to provide this information to the CDCR.

             There is currently a substantial backlog of cases where 
             CDCR has collected restitution from an inmate that goes 
             back a number of years.  The list of cases where 
             restitution has actually been collected numbers at about 
             3,200.  There are also cases where the CDCR has not yet 
             collected from an inmate account, but they are aware 
             that there is a restitution order and will begin to 
             collect from the inmate when money is in the account.  
             These cases number well over 20,000.  In all of these 
             cases, no victim contact information has been provided 
             to the CDCR.  The CDCR has a court order mandating the 
             payment of restitution but no way to pay because they do 
             not have victim contact information.  


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  77-0, 4/16/12
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, 
            Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 







                                                               AB 2251
                                                                Page 
          5

            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, 
            Carter, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eng, 
            Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Beth Gaines, Galgiani, 
            Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Gorell, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, 
            Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Roger Hernández, Hill, Huber, 
            Hueso, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Lara, Logue, 
            Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mansoor, Mendoza, Miller, Mitchell, 
            Monning, Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Pan, 
            Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Portantino, Silva, Skinner, 
            Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Valadao, Wagner, 
            Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cedillo, Davis, Furutani


          RJG:k  6/18/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****