BILL ANALYSIS Ó
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
AB 2252 (Gordon) - Dental coverage: provider notice of changes.
Amended: August 6, 2012 Policy Vote: Health 9-0
Urgency: No Mandate: Yes
Hearing Date: August 6, 2012
Consultant: Brendan McCarthy
This bill does not meet the criteria for referral to the
Suspense File.
Bill Summary: AB 2252 would require additional notification to
dental providers when a health plan or insurer covering dental
services makes material changes to rules, guidelines, coverage,
or payments.
Fiscal Impact:
The Department of Managed Health Care may incur one-time
costs up to $70,000 (Managed Care Fund) to review health
plan documents. Costs to the Department of Insurance are
likely to be minor.
No increase in costs to the state as a provider of dental
benefits is likely to occur, as the changes in the bill are
not anticipated to significantly increase the costs of
providing dental coverage.
Background: Under current state law, health plans are regulated
by the Department of Managed Health Care while health insurers
are regulated by the Department of Insurance. Current law
requires health plans and insurers to provide notification to
providers within certain time periods if material changes have
been made to a manual, policy, or procedure document, unless the
change has already first been negotiated with the provider.
Proposed Law: AB 2252 requires health plans and insurers that
cover dental services to provide 45 days' notice of any material
change to rules, guidelines, policies or procedures of the plan
or policy. Notification can be made electronically or by
facsimile.
For health plans and insurers that automatically renew contracts
AB 2252 (Gordon)
Page 1
annually, the bill requires the health plan or insurer to make
available to the provider, upon request and within 60 days, a
copy of the contract and a summary of the changes.
The provisions of the bill do not apply to health plans or
insurers that contract with two or fewer medical groups
Staff Comments: Because the only costs that may be incurred by a
local government agency relate to crimes or infractions, the
bill does not create a reimbursable state mandate.
The recently adopted Author Amendments: narrow the notification
requirements and delete any change to the existing statutory
definition of "material" as it relates to changes to a provider
contract.