BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2402 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 25, 2012 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Felipe Fuentes, Chair AB 2402 (Huffman) - As Amended: April 18, 2012 Policy Committee: Water, Parks and Wildlife Vote: 9-3 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill makes numerous changes to the Fish and Game Code to implement many of the recommendations made by the interim strategic vision report released in 2011 by the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) and the Fish and Game Commission (FGC). Specifically, this bill: 1)Changes the name of the department from DFG to the Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2)Directs DFG to not change or destroy existing supplies as a result of the name change and to continue to use those supplies until exhausted or unserviceable. 3)Requires DFG to modify its Automated License Data System to include Fish and Game Code violations and to make ALDS data available to wardens in the field. 4)Requires the director of DFG to establish a 10-member independent science advisory panel to advise the department and the commission. 5)Authorizes DFG to adjust various license fees-including fees for scientific collection of wildlife, guiding, hunting, fishing, harvesting aquatic plants and collecting abalone-to fully cover all reasonable administrative and implementation costs to DFG and FGC. 6)Requires DFG to impose fees onsite on entry passes for visitors, such as hikers and birdwatchers, that engage in nonconsumptive uses (meaning other than hunting or fishing) at AB 2402 Page 2 state wildlife refuges and other DFG-managed lands open to the public. 7)Consolidates revenue from various hunting accounts and transfers them to the Big Game Management Account (BGMA). FISCAL EFFECT 1)One-time costs during 2012-13 and 2013-14 to DFG in excess of $150,000 to update its IT systems to account for change in the department's name (Fish and Game Preservation Fund (FGPF)). (Despite the bill's call for the department to continue to use existing supplies until gone or unusable, DFG reports costs in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. According to DFG, these costs result from thousands of hours needed to revise website and domain name data, modify information technology (IT) infrastructure and redesign templates. DFG estimates the cost of these efforts to range from $300,000 to $400,000.) 2)One-time costs in 2012-13 and 2013-14 to DFG of an unknown, but substantial amount (in the hundreds of thousands of dollars), to modify ALDS and make data available to wardens in the field (FGPF). 3)Minor costs to DFG, in the tens of thousands of dollars annually, to establish and support the scientific advisory committee, the members of which, presumably, will not be compensated by DFG, and provide administrative support to it (FGPF). 4)Increased annual revenue beginning in 2013-14 to DFG of an unknown but substantial amount, likely in millions of dollars, resulting from adjustments to various license fees (FGPF). 5)One-time costs in 2012-13 and 2013-14 to DFG of an unknown, but potentially substantial amount (possibly in the hundreds of thousands of dollars) to develop and implement a method to collect fees from nonconsumptive users of DFG-managed facilities (FGPF). 6)Annual revenue, beginning in 2013-14, to DFG of an unknown amount, but likely well in excess of related one-time and ongoing costs, from nonconsumptive use fees (FGPF). COMMENTS AB 2402 Page 3 1)Rationale . The author intends this bill to implement several of the recommendations from the interim strategic vision report released in 2011. 2)Background. AB 2376 (Huffman, Chapter 424, Statutes of 2010) requires the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to convene a committee to develop a strategic plan for DFG and FGC. Members of the committee include state and federal officials and stakeholders. In response, the secretary appointed a state executive commission, a blue ribbon citizen's commission and a stakeholder advisory group, who, together, worked for a year to develop recommendations on how to improve DFG and FGC operations to better protect and manage the state's fish and wildlife for the benefit of Californians. A draft interim strategic vision report was released in 2011 and a final Strategic Vision Report in February 2012. This bill includes several of the recommendations made by the report. Currently, DFG is updating its licensing system, to be known as ALDS, an automated, online electronic database of hunting and fishing licensing information. DFG anticipates full ALDS implementation by 2014. ALDS will replace DFG's paper-based licensing system. Using ALDS, DFG, and its licensed agents, will gain the ability to capture and quickly retrieve customer information, including license purchase histories. 3)Support. This bill is supported by several conservation organizations that participated in the Strategic Vision Process. 4)There is no opposition formally registered to this bill. Analysis Prepared by : Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081