BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 2610
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2610 (Skinner)
          As Amended April 19, 2012
          Majority vote 

           JUDICIARY           7-3         HOUSING             5-2         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Feuer, Atkins, Dickinson, |Ayes:|Torres, Atkins, Bradford, |
          |     |Huber, Monning,           |     |Fong, Hueso               |
          |     |Wieckowski, Alejo         |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Wagner, Gorell, Jones     |Nays:|Beth Gaines, Jeffries     |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      11-5                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield,     |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford, Charles         |     |                          |
          |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |     |                          |
          |     |Gatto, Hall, Hill, Lara,  |     |                          |
          |     |Mitchell                  |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Harkey, Donnelly,         |     |                          |
          |     |Nielsen, Solorio, Wagner  |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Improves notice to tenants in foreclosed properties.  
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Revises the requirement of existing law providing 60 days' 
            notice to instead provide, in the case of a month-to-month 
            lease, for 90 days' notice for tenants in a foreclosed 
            property.

          2)Specifies that a tenant holding possession under a residential 
            lease of a rental housing unit at the time the property is 
            sold in foreclosure shall have the right to possession until 
            the end of the lease term.  This provision would not apply if 
            the new owner will occupy the property as his or her primary 
            residence or if the lease was entered into within 15 days 








                                                                  AB 2610
                                                                  Page  2


            prior to the posting of the notice of sale.  In either case, 
            however, the new owner must give the tenant a 90-day notice to 
            vacate.  

          3)Requires that a residential lease that is entered into after 
            the expiration of 75 days following a notice of default must 
            contain a notice that alerts the prospective tenant that the 
            foreclosure process has started on the property and the 
            property may be sold at foreclosure in as soon as 20 days, 
            which will terminate the lease.  The notice also informs 
            tenants that if they rent the property, the new owner may 
            evict them after a 90-day eviction notice. 

          4)Revises existing law's notice that is sent to tenants when a 
            notice of sale is posted on the property to ensure that it 
            accurately reflects the revisions proposed above.  This bill 
            would provide that the changes in this notice would not become 
            operative until March 1, 2013, or 60 days following the 
            issuance of an amended new translation by the Department of 
            Consumer Affairs (DCA), whichever occurs later. 

          5)Eliminates the January 1, 2013, sunset date that would 
            otherwise apply to these sections and the related provisions 
            of existing law. 

          6)Specifies that Code of Civil Procedure Section 415.46 does not 
            limit the right of a tenant to file a prejudgment claim of 
            right of possession at any time before judgment or to object 
            to enforcement of a judgment for possession whether or not the 
            tenant was served with the claim of right to possession.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, minor absorbable costs to DCA for the required 
          translations and postings on its Web site.
           
          COMMENTS  :  The author explains the reason for the bill as 
          follows:  "As more and more homes are sold through foreclosure, 
          tenants increasingly face the specter of sudden dislocation of 
          themselves, their families and their belongings.  Renters are 
          usually the last to know of foreclosure, and many renters, 
          including families with children, are ending up homeless due to 
          foreclosure evictions.  Due to inconsistency in state and 
          federal law, tenants are often confused or misled about their 
          legal protections, and how long they have to move when served 








                                                                  AB 2610
                                                                  Page  3


          with a notice to vacate after a foreclosure sale.  AB 2610 would 
          help alleviate the debilitating, sudden upheaval of Californians 
          who reside in foreclosed properties by eliminating the 
          inconsistency, confusion and abuse of existing laws intended to 
          protect them.  AB 2610 would:  Require purchasers of foreclosed 
          homes to give tenants at least 90 days before commencing 
          eviction proceedings; allow tenants in foreclosed homes under a 
          residential lease to stay until the end of the lease term, 
          except in cases where the new owner plans to use the property as 
          their primary residence; and eliminate the existing sunset 
          dates."
               
          California leads the nation with one of the highest rates of 
          foreclosure.  According to RealtyTrac, in California, one in 
          every 303 housing units received a foreclosure filing in March 
          2012, and 48,422 houses received a foreclosure notice in 
          February alone.  Tenants living in those homes have been 
          significantly affected.  A November 18, 2007, New York Times 
          article, "As Owners Feel Mortgage Pain, So Do Renters," noted ". 
          . . thousands of American families are losing their homes 
          without ever missing a payment.  They are renters in houses 
          whose owners default on their mortgages - a large but little 
          noticed class of casualties."  

          In January 2011, Tenants Together released its third annual 
          report entitled "California Renters in the Foreclosure Crisis."  
          The report estimated that at least 38% of homes in foreclosures 
          were rentals and more than 200,000 California renters were 
          directly affected by home foreclosures in 2010 alone.  Tenants 
          Together further estimated that these numbers, based on data 
          from Foreclosure Radar, likely undercount the number of 
          foreclosed homes that are in fact rentals.  The report indicated 
          that the counties with the highest foreclosed rental units 
          (5,000 or more) were:  Los Angeles, Riverside, Sacramento, and 
          San Bernardino.  In those counties, 45,860 renters were affected 
          in Los Angeles; 18,823 in Riverside; 17,033 in Sacramento; and, 
          17,356 in San Bernardino.  In San Francisco, 61% of foreclosed 
          units were renter occupied.  The report listed other counties 
          with comparatively high percentages of renter-occupied 
          foreclosed units including:  Alameda (40%); Fresno (42%); 
          Humboldt (42%); Mono (41%); Napa (40%); and, San Mateo (41%).  
          (See "California Renters in the Foreclosure Crisis, Third Annual 
          Report," January 2011, Tenants Together, available at 
          http://tenantstogether.org/.)








                                                                  AB 2610
                                                                  Page  4



          California enacted important protections in SB 1137 (Perata, 
          Corbett, and Machado), Chapter 69, Statutes of 2008, requiring 
          purchasers of foreclosed homes at a foreclosure sale to give at 
          least 60 days' notice before evicting tenants in those homes.  
          To ensure that the extended time period cannot be exploited by a 
          former owner who rents the property to another person but 
          remains in the foreclosed home, SB 1137 provided that the 
          extended time period does not apply if any party to the mortgage 
          note remains in the property as a tenant, subtenant, or 
          occupant.  After the enactment of SB 1137, President Obama 
          signed S. 896, P.L. 111-22, which included the "Protecting 
          Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009" (PTFA).  The PTFA, which is 
          currently scheduled to sunset on December 31, 2014, generally 
          requires the purchaser of a home at a foreclosure sale to honor 
          a bona fide tenant's lease unless the purchaser intends to 
          occupy the home as their primary residence.  If there is no 
          lease, if the lease is terminable at will (a month-to-month 
          tenancy), or if the purchaser will occupy the home as their 
          primary residence, the tenant must be provided with a 90-day 
          notice to vacate (unless a longer period is required by state or 
          local law).  As a result, currently federal law generally 
          provides greater protection to tenants than state law by 
          providing additional time (90 vs. 60 days) and imposes a 
          requirement that the lease be honored under certain 
          circumstances. 

          This bill would make the state law provisions described above 
          similar to federal law by providing that a new owner of a 
          foreclosed property must honor a tenant's lease.  Under the 
          bill, this provision would not apply if the new owner will 
          occupy the property as his or her primary residence or if the 
          lease was entered into within 15 days prior to the posting of 
          the notice of sale.  In either of those instances the new owner 
          must give the tenant a 90-day notice to vacate. 

          This bill would make changes to the notice that must be sent to 
          tenants in foreclosed properties when the property is noticed 
          for a foreclosure sale.  The changes ensure that the notice is 
          accurate and reflective of state and federal law.  For example, 
          the existing notice states that the new property owner may 
          provide the tenant with a 60 days' eviction notice, however the 
          bill would revise this provision to require that a tenant's 
          lease be honored, except in certain cases, and tenants in 








                                                                  AB 2610
                                                                  Page  5


          month-to-month leases be provided with 90 days' notice.  As a 
          result, the bill would then revise the notice accordingly so 
          that tenants are accurately advised of state law.  In order to 
          address concerns raised by the business trade associations, the 
          bill would delay the operation of this section until March 1, 
          2013, or 60 days following the issuance of a form by the 
          Department of Consumer Affairs, whichever is later.  

           This bill would specify that existing law which permits an owner 
          to use a prejudgment claim of right of possession against a 
          holdover former owner when the property has been sold at 
          foreclosure does not limit the right of a tenant to file a 
          prejudgment claim of right of possession at any time before 
          judgment or to object to enforcement of a judgment for 
          possession whether or not the tenant was served with the claim 
          of right to possession.  This change would permit a tenant in a 
          foreclosed property to file a postjudgment claim of right to 
          possession or a claim of right to possession pursuant to Code of 
          Civil Procedure Section 1174.3. 
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :   Kevin G. Baker / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 


                                                                FN: 0003695