BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2675 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 2, 2012 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT Sandre Swanson, Chair AB 2675 (Labor Committee) - As Amended: April 16, 2012 SUBJECT : Public works: prevailing wage rates: penalty assessment. SUMMARY : Clarifies that portions of payments withheld to satisfy civil wage and penalty assessments are deemed forfeited upon receipt of a final order that is no longer subject to judicial review. EXISTING LAW: 1)Specifies that, before making payments to the contractor of money due under a contract for public work, the awarding body shall withhold and retain therefrom all amounts required to satisfy any civil wage and penalty assessment issued by the Labor Commissioner under existing law. 2)Provides that the amounts required to satisfy a civil wage and penalty assessment shall not be disbursed by the awarding body until receipt of a final order that is no longer subject to judicial review. 3)Provides that if the awarding body has not retained sufficient money under the contract to satisfy a civil wage and penalty assessment based on a subcontractor's violations, the contractor shall, upon the request of the Labor Commissioner, withhold sufficient money due the subcontractor under the contract to satisfy the assessment and transfer the money to the awarding body. These amounts shall not be disbursed by the awarding body until receipt of a final order that is no longer subject to judicial review. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : This bill makes a technical change to current law which was brought to the Committee's attention through discussions with the Department of Industrial Relations. Current Labor Code Section 1727 is entitled, "Withholding payment of amounts forfeited." The existing law requires AB 2675 Page 2 awarding bodies and contractors to withhold from specified payments amounts necessary to satisfy civil wage and hour penalties issued by the Labor Commissioner. The final outcome is resolved when there is a final order that is no longer subject to judicial review. However, despite the fact that the title to Labor Code Section 1727 states "forfeited," the actual text of the law does not refer to these amounts as "forfeited." The courts have previously characterized the amounts withheld or retained under Section 1727 as a "forfeiture." (J & K Painting Co. v. Bradshaw (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1394, 1404-1405). Therefore, to avoid any potential confusion, this bill simply clarifies that once there is a final order that is no longer subject to judicial review, these amounts withheld are indeed deemed forfeited. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support None on file. Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by : Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091