BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 10 Page 1 SENATE THIRD READING SB 10 (Evans) As Amended April 25, 2011 2/3 vote. Urgency SENATE VOTE :37-0 VETERANS AFFAIRS 9-0 APPROPRIATIONS 16-0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Ayes:|Cook, Pan, Atkins, Block, |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey, | | |Nielsen, V. Manuel Pérez, | |Blumenfield, Bradford, | | |Williams, Yamada, Beth | |Charles Calderon, Campos, | | |Gaines | |Davis, Donnelly, | | | | |Dickinson, Hall, Hill, | | | | |Lara, Nielsen, Norby, | | | | |Solorio, Wagner | |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------| | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY : This bill would provide for the establishment of a Veterans' Home Allied Council for each veterans' home. Each home's Allied Council would represent veterans who reside in that home in matters before the Legislature provided certain specified requirements, are met. Specifically, this bill : 1)Allows respective Allied Councils for California's veterans homes to represent their homes before the Legislature. 2)Requires any representation before the Legislature by a council to be approved by a majority of the council's voting members. 3)Prohibits any council representation on behalf of candidates or campaigns. 4)Requires any actions before the Legislature to be in accord with the council's "constitution, bylaws, and policies and procedures." 5)Performs code cleanup of Military and Veterans Code (MVC) Section 1050. 6)Contains an urgency clause, allowing the bill to take effect SB 10 Page 2 immediately upon enactment. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, minor absorbable costs, presumably special fund, to provide nominal support to these advisory bodies. COMMENTS : According to the author, "The California Department of Veterans Affairs (CDVA) is interpreting the ÝMilitary and Veterans] code to read that the Allied Council is "only an advisory body" and cannot represent veterans' interests directly to the Legislature. The Allied Council has been advised by the Home administrator that it may not represent veterans' issues directly before the legislature. Veterans feel that better communication with CDVA is possible and necessary and that in order to negotiate on their behalf, the Allied Council must have clear authority to speak for Home members." According to the CDVA, this bill is constitutionally flawed in two respects. First, the CDVA contends that the bill if enacted would violate Article II, Section 12 of the California Constitution. As set forth above, that article states, "No amendment to the Constitution, and no statute proposed to the electors by the Legislature that? identifies any private corporation to perform any function or to have any power or duty, may be submitted to the electors or have any effect." In summary, the CDVA argues that the Allied Council, as a private entity, would be performing a private function when addressing the Legislature and would be assigned specific powers and duties, thus violating the Constitution. In addition, the CDVA asserts that the use of public funds to support the Allied Council's political activity is prohibited by the Article XVI, Section 3 of the California Constitution, as the political activities of the Allied Council are not managed or controlled by the state. The bill substantially alters the role of the Councils. Conceived as internal advisory bodies to the administrator of each home on issues concerning the operation of that home, the Councils will now be direct advocates to the Legislature. When all the currently planned homes are complete, there could be eight Allied Councils, one at each home. PREVIOUS VETO : AB 2156 (Evans) of 2010, with substantially the same language, passed both houses of the Legislature but was the SB 10 Page 3 subject of a veto last session. In his veto message of AB 2156, Governor Schwarzenegger said, "I am returning Assembly Bill 2156 without my signature. This bill is unnecessary. There are numerous advocacy organizations that represent the interests of California veterans. In addition, if a resident at a state veteran's home wishes to voice their concerns to the Legislature, they are currently free to do so." Analysis Prepared by : John Spangler / V. A. / (916) 319-3550 FN: 0001724