BILL ANALYSIS Ó ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 16| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: SB 16 Author: Rubio (D) Amended: 4/12/11 Vote: 27 - Urgency SENATE NATURAL RES. AND WATER COMMITTEE : 6-1, 3/22/11 AYES: Pavley, Evans, Kehoe, Padilla, Simitian, Wolk NOES: La Malfa NO VOTE RECORDED: Cannella, Fuller SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 5-3, 4/11/11 AYES: Kehoe, Alquist, Pavley, Price, Steinberg NOES: Walters, Emmerson, Runner NO VOTE RECORDED: Lieu SUBJECT : Renewable energy: Department of Fish and Game: expedited permitting SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill shortens some existing timelines for the review of California Endangered Species Act (CESA) permit applications by the Department of Fish and Game (DFG), and extends an existing application fee of $75,000 to all energy projects proposed in order to meet the state's Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). ANALYSIS : Under current law, thermal power plants with a capacity over 50 megawatts are licensed by the Energy Commission. CONTINUED SB 16 Page 2 Under the CESA, certain species are listed as endangered, threatened, or candidates for protected under the law. The "take" of those listed species is prohibited without an incidental take permit, which typically includes stringent mitigation requirements. The DFG is required to review project applications for incidental take permits. The DFG spends about $4 million per year reviewing incidental take permit applications. The DFG generally does not charge fees for this review. Under current regulation, the DFG is required to complete an initial review of an incidental take permit application for completeness within 30 days. Depending on whether the DFG is designated a "lead agency" or a "responsible agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act, the DFG must act to approve or deny and incidental take permit within 90 days (with the potential for a 60 day extension) or 120 days (with a potential 60 day extension). Current law requires the state's investor owned electricity utilities and load serving entities to increase their procurement of renewable energy by one percent per year, such that twenty percent of their total electricity load comes from renewable resources by December 31, 2010. This requirement is referred to as the Renewables Portfolio Standard. This bill: 1. Imposes a requirement that the DFG, within 10 days, to notify applicants when an application for an incidental take permit is complete. 2. Imposes a requirement that DFG approve or reject an incidental take application within 90 days after the application is complete, if the permit involves only the state endangered species act. 3. Imposes a requirement that DFG approve or reject an incidental take application within 150 days after the application is complete where the permit involves species listed pursuant to both the state and federal endangered species act. This provision would mirror CONTINUED SB 16 Page 3 the same applicable timeline that is in federal regulations ,as is the case in federal regulations. 4. Extends the $75,000 application fee to all renewable energy projects eligible under the state's RPS. For complex applications, the DFG is authorized to charge up to an additional $75,000 (based on the DFG's actual costs). For applications that require the DFG only to determine whether an existing federal incidental take permit is consistent with the CESA, the DFG is authorized to charge a fee equal to the DFG's actual costs of making the consistence determination (which is likely to be significantly less than $75,000). The fee would be imposed on all new projects when they are submitted, or for applications that have already been submitted, and is currently under review, by January 30, 2012. 5. For projects that are eligible for a consistency determination pursuant to Section 2080.1 of the Fish and Game Code, the fee would not be $75,000 but instead would be the DFG's actual costs of reviewing the application, an amount that would be considerably lower. 6. The DFG would be required to produce a full accounting of its expenditures of fee revenues for all of the factors listed in the bill. Background The DFG has the responsibility to administer the CESA, among other duties. This law authorizes, in specified circumstances, DFG to issue "incidental take" permits to enable a development project to harm one or more protected species or their habitat. In the absence of such a permit, CESA prohibits the take of any endangered or threatened species. DFG may issue an incidental take permit authorizing the take of endangered or threatened species if certain conditions are met, including that the take is incidental to an otherwise lawful activity, and the impacts of the authorized take are minimized and fully mitigated. CESA requires applicants to ensure adequate funding to implement mitigation and monitoring measures. CONTINUED SB 16 Page 4 Last year, in SB 34 8X (Padilla), Chapter 9, Statutes of 2009-10, Eighth Extraordinary Session, the Legislature passed and Governor Schwarzenegger signed into law several amendments to CESA that were intended to expedite the regulatory approval of solar thermal and photovoltaic energy projects in parts of the southern California desert within the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Program (DRECP) planning area. The DRECP effort will identify the best sites for renewable projects and the best lands that should be reserved for mitigation. Among other provisions, that new statute provides for the in lieu payment of funds that would allow DFG to purchase mitigation lands in advance for eligible renewable energy projects in the desert that were to receive funds from the federal government's stimulus (ARRA) funds. That new law also created a $75,000 fee that developers would pay to DFG to cover its costs in reviewing the endangered species implications of these projects. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Fund Staff costs to meet Unknown costs, covered by new revenues Special* shorter review deadlines Fee revenues Up to ($7,500) per year Special* * Fish and Game Preservation Fund. ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author: "SB 16 is needed because there is currently no timeframe under which DFG must adhere to in the review of CONTINUED SB 16 Page 5 incidental take permits for siting renewable energy permits already approved by the county. Applicants often wait long periods of time and the project is delayed. "Kern County has approved and moved into the construction phase over 1000 megawatts of wind and solar energy projects. The average timeline for DFG to issue incidental take permits was six months. The processing times varied greatly and there is no specific timeframe under which applicants can rely. "It is anticipated that DFG will be inundated with more than 300 applicants for renewable energy projects this year because of the increasing interest in renewable energy projects and because of the investment and tax provisions contained in state and federal law. SB 16 is essential to ensuing these projects are approved in a reasonable frame." CTW:kc 4/12/11 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: NONE RECEIVED **** END **** CONTINUED