BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 6X1|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 6X1
          Author:   Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee
          Amended:  9/2/11
          Vote:     21

           
          PRIOR VOTES NOT RELEVANT

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  48-27, 9/8/11 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Budget Act of 2011

           SOURCE  :     State Budget:  Expenditure Reductions trailer 
          bill


           DIGEST  :    This bill makes necessary changes to implement 
          expenditure reductions in 2011-12 if revenues fall below 
          forecast levels, as specified in Section 3.94 of the 2011 
          Budget Bill.

           Assembly Amendments  delete the prior version of the bill 
          which expressed legislative intent, and insert the above 
          provisions.

           ANALYSIS  :    The 2011 Budget Bill anticipates General Fund 
          revenues of $88.5 billion.  Per Section 3.94 of the 2011 
          Budget Bill, the Department of Finance (DOF) is required to 
          provide notification to the Joint Legislative Budget 
          Committee by December 15, 2011, with an updated revenue 
          forecast for 2011-12.  Section 3.94 further states that if 
          revenues are forecast to be lower by $1 billion to $2 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 6X1
                                                                Page 
          2

          billion, expenditure cuts of $600 million are triggered on. 
           If revenues are forecast to be lower by more than $2 
          billion, then additional expenditure cuts of $1.9 billion 
          are triggered on.  Related legislation in the enacted 2011 
          budget package included the statutory provisions to 
          implement these reductions.  

          If Section 3.94 of the 2011 Budget Bill is operative 
          because revenues are below forecast, this bill makes 
          further changes to implement the trigger reductions, 
          including the following:

          1.  Community College Fee Increase Trigger  .  Current law 
             states that the community college fee level is $36 per 
             unit, effective with the "fall" 2011 term.  Under 
             current law, if revenues fall below forecast levels and 
             the budget trigger is operative, the community college 
             fee increase "trigger" of $10 per unit ( to a total of 
             $46 per unit) is effective 
          January 1, 2012, and will commence in the "winter" term of 
             the 2011-12 academic year.  

             This bill makes changes to these provisions of law to 
             clarify that if the community college fee increase 
             "trigger" of $10 per unit (to a total of $46 per unit) 
             is operative pursuant to Section 3.94 of the 2011 Budget 
             Bill, it is effective May 1, 2012, and would commence in 
             the "summer" term of the 2012 calendar year.  

             Adopts a statement of legislative intent that trigger 
             reductions made by community college districts in 
             2011-12 pursuant to Section 3.94 reflect the one-time 
             nature of the statewide $30 million reduction imposed as 
             a result of delaying the $10 per unit student fee 
             increase from the winter term to the summer term.  
             Further, and until the increased fees are collected, it 
             is the intent of the Legislature that districts should, 
             to the extent possible, make every effort to implement 
             reductions in a manner that will minimize the impact on 
             course offerings and programs needed by students to 
             achieve their basic skills, workforce training, or 
             transfer goals.

          2.  2011 Budget Act Trigger Reductions  .  Requires the 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 6X1
                                                                Page 
          3

             Director of DOF to make every effort to notify the 
             Legislature by December 9, 2011, of the specific trigger 
             reductions that are proposed and, at least 10 days prior 
             to implementing the trigger reductions, consult with the 
             Legislature about the reductions as well as alternative 
             budget solutions to those set forth in current law, as 
             specified.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

          Unknown with latest amendments.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/7/11)

          The Arc and United Cerebral Palsy in California


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR :  48-27, 9/8/11
          AYES:  Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Block, 
            Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, 
            Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, 
            Chesbro, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, 
            Furutani, Gatto, Gordon, Hall, Hayashi, Roger Hern�ndez, 
            Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Lara, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, 
            Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, V. Manuel P�rez, 
            Skinner, Swanson, Torres, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, 
            John A. P�rez
          NOES:  Achadjian, Bill Berryhill, Conway, Cook, Donnelly, 
            Fletcher, Beth Gaines, Garrick, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, 
            Harkey, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Logue, Mansoor, Miller, 
            Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Silva, Smyth, 
            Valadao, Wagner
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Galgiani, Gorell, Perea, Portantino, 
            Solorio


          DLW:mw  9/9/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****



                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 6X1
                                                                Page 
          4














































                                                           CONTINUED