BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SJR 3
                                                                  Page 1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SJR 3 (Pavley)
          As Amended  June 3, 2011
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :22-15  
           
           ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY          6-3                               
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Wieckowski, Campos,       |     |                          |
          |     |Chesbro, Davis, Feuer,    |     |                          |
          |     |Bonnie Lowenthal          |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           -------------------------------- 
          |Nays:|Miller, Morrell, Valadao  |
          |     |                          |
           -------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Urges the President and the 112th Congress of the 
          United States to enact legislation to modernize the federal 
          Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA) by strengthening 
          chemical management through specified policy reforms.  
          Specifically,  this resolution  :

          1)Makes findings about chemicals in commerce in the United 
            States and about the inadequacy of current federal chemicals 
            law.

          2)Urges the President and the 112th Congress of the United 
            States to enact federal legislation to modernize TSCA by 
            strengthening chemical management through policy reforms that 
            would do all of the following:

             a)   Require producers and importers to perform comprehensive 
               toxicity testing on their products and to fully disclose 
               the results of their testing;


             b)   Require producers and importers to disclose the 
               identities of chemicals in their products;


             c)   Require immediate action to reduce or eliminate the 








                                                                  SJR 3
                                                                  Page 2


               worst chemicals;


             d)   Preserve the authority of state and tribal governments 
               to operate chemical management programs that are more 
               protective than the programs established by the federal 
               government;


             e)   Establish health safety standards for chemicals that 
               rely on the best available science to protect the most 
               vulnerable;


             f)   Support those chemical manufacturers that are striving 
               to establish that all existing and new chemicals are not 
               harmful to human health, and to provide essential health 
               and safety information on chemicals to inform the market, 
               consumers, and the public;


             g)   Reward innovation by fast-tracking the approval of new, 
               demonstrably safer chemicals, and invest in green chemistry 
               research and workforce development; and,


             h)   Promote environmental justice by developing action plans 
               to reduce disproportionate exposure to toxic chemicals in 
               "hot spot" communities.



           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Under TSCA, authorizes the United States Environmental 
            Protection Agency (US EPA) to secure information on new and 
            existing chemical substances, as well as to control any of the 
            substances that are determined to cause unreasonable risk to 
            public health or the environment.  Exempts certain substances 
            from TSCA, including, among others, food, drugs, cosmetics and 
            pesticides.

          2)Under California Green Chemistry statutes (Health and Safety 
            Code (HSC) 25251 et. seq.), requires the Department of Toxic 








                                                                  SJR 3
                                                                  Page 3


            Substances Control (DTSC) to identify and prioritize chemicals 
            of concern.  Requires DTSC to adopt regulations to evaluate 
            chemicals of concern in consumer products, and their potential 
            alternatives, to determine how best to limit exposure or to 
            reduce the level of hazard posed by a chemical of concern.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS :

           Need for the resolution  :  According to the author, "The Toxic 
          Substance Control Act (TSCA) of 1976 has not been updated for 
          the past 35 years.  Today there are more than 80,000 chemicals 
          on the market, which have never been fully assessed for toxic 
          impacts on human health and environment.  This resolution urges 
          strong reform of TSCA and demands that states not be preempted 
          from going further than Federal law if a state chooses to do so. 
           By updating TSCA, Congress will have the capacity to create the 
          foundation for a sound and comprehensive chemicals policy that 
          protects public health and the environment, while restoring the 
          luster and safety to U.S. goods in the world market."

           Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA)  :  TSCA was enacted 
          in 1976 to provide US EPA with the authority, upon making 
          certain determinations, to collect information about the hazards 
          posed by chemical substances and to take action to control 
          unreasonable risks by either preventing dangerous chemicals from 
          being introduced into the marketplace or by placing restrictions 
          on those already in commerce.  US EPA lists chemicals in 
          commerce in the TSCA inventory.  Of the over 83,000 chemicals 
          currently in the TSCA inventory, about 62,000 were already in 
          commerce when US EPA began reviewing chemicals in 1979, 
          essentially "grandfathering" these chemicals in.  Since then, 
          more than 21,000 new chemicals have been added to the inventory 
          and are currently in use.  To assess a chemical's risks, EPA 
          examines its toxicity or potential adverse effects and the 
          amount of human and environmental exposures.

           TSCA inadequacies  :  The United States Government Accountability 
          Office (GAO) has performed several reviews of the efficacy of 
          TSCA over the past two decades and has repeatedly found that 
          TSCA, as it is applied, does not adequately protect public 
          health and the environment from toxic chemicals.  In January of 
          2009, the GAO placed TSCA on its list of "high risk" areas of 








                                                                  SJR 3
                                                                  Page 4


          the law.  The deficiencies of TSCA identified by the GAO 
          include:

          1)TSCA generally places the burden of obtaining data about 
            existing chemicals on US EPA rather than on chemical 
            companies.  Consequently, US EPA has required testing of fewer 
            than 200 of the 62,000 chemicals in commerce when US EPA began 
            reviewing chemicals under TSCA in 1979.  US EPA does not 
            routinely assess the risks of the over 83,000 chemicals 
            already in use.

          2)TSCA does not require chemical companies to test new chemicals 
            introduced into commerce each year for toxicity, and companies 
            generally do not voluntarily perform such testing.  The 
            procedures US EPA must follow to obtain test data from 
            companies can take years.

          3)While TSCA authorizes US EPA to ban, limit, or otherwise 
            regulate existing toxic chemicals, the statutory requirements 
            US EPA must meet present a legal threshold that has proven 
            difficult for US EPA and discourages the agency from using 
            these authorities.  For example, US EPA must demonstrate 
            "unreasonable risk" to ban or limit chemical production, which 
            US EPA believes requires it to conduct extensive, expensive 
            cost-benefit analyses that can take many years to complete.  
            Since 1976, US EPA has issued regulations to control only five 
            existing chemicals.

          4)Because of TSCA's prohibitions on the disclosure of 
            confidential business information, US EPA has limited ability 
            to share information on chemical production and risk.  About 
            95% of the notices companies have provided to US EPA on new 
            chemicals contain some information claimed as confidential.  
            US EPA does not challenge most claims.

           Related federal legislative action  :  On April 14, 2011, U.S. 
          Senators Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), 
          Charles E. Schumer (D-NY), Al Franken (D-MN), and Amy Klobuchar 
          (D-MN) introduced S. 847, the "Safe Chemicals Act of 2011."  
          This legislation seeks to modernize TSCA to require safety 
          testing of all industrial chemicals, and to put the 
          responsibility on industry to demonstrate that chemicals are 
          safe in order to get on or stay on the market.  The bill 
          endeavors to expand US EPA's authority to regulate the use of 








                                                                  SJR 3
                                                                  Page 5


          dangerous chemicals and require manufacturers to submit 
          information proving the safety of chemicals in production and 
          new chemicals seeking to enter the market.

           Related federal administrative action  :  On September 29, 2009, 
          US EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson announced that the US EPA was 
          establishing a comprehensive approach to enhance the US EPA's 
          current chemicals management program under TSCA.  The most 
          important component of this enhanced chemical management program 
          involves the action plan process, which is intended to:  1) 
          Identify chemicals that pose a concern to the public; 2) Move 
          quickly to evaluate them and determine what actions need to be 
          taken to address the risks they may pose; and, 3) Initiate 
          appropriate action.  To date, US EPA has developed action plans 
          for 10 classes of chemicals.

          SJR 3 seeks to support federal efforts to strengthen TSCA.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Shannon McKinney / E.S. & T.M. / (916) 
          319-3965 


                                                                FN: 0001276