BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






                  SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUDGET AND FISCAL REVIEW
                                Mark Leno, Chair
                                        
          Bill No:       SB 94
          Author:        Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
          As Amended:    April 15, 2011
          Consultant:    Brian Annis
          Fiscal:        Yes
          Hearing Date:  May 2, 2011
          
          Subject:  Vehicle License Fee Law: vehicle registration.

          Summary:  This bill contains necessary changes to the 
          Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) vehicle registration 
          process to facilitate solutions contained in the 2011-12 
          budget package.

          Background:  The DMV collects fees annually from the owners 
          of motor vehicles for registration that support the 
          operation of the DMV and the California Highway Patrol, 
          among other departments.  As part of the vehicle 
          registration collection, the DMV also collects the Vehicle 
          License Fee (VLF) which is an in-lieu local property tax 
          based on the value of the vehicle.  The VLF rate was set at 
          2.0 percent of a vehicle's value for a 50-year period 
          ending in 1998.  The VLF rate was reduced over time to a 
          new base rate of 0.65 percent, and the State General Fund 
          backfills revenue loss to local governments of 
          approximately $6 billion annually.  Legislation enacted in 
          2009 (AB X3 3, Chapter 18), increased the VLF rate to 1.15 
          percent for a period ending June 30, 2011, after which the 
          rate returns to 0.65 percent.  The temporary rate increase 
          provides approximately $1.4 billion to the State General 
          Fund, including about $500 million to support local law 
          enforcement programs.  

          Current law directs DMV in the administration of vehicle 
          registration.  Among other requirements, the DMV is 
          directed to bill vehicle owners at least 60-days in advance 
          of the payment due date for registration and the VLF.

          The Governor's January Budget proposed to maintain the 
          current 1.15 percent VLF rate for an additional five-year 
          period to support his state-local realignment proposal.  
                                       -1- 










          Within the realignment proposal is the continuation of 
          about $500 million in funding for local law enforcement 
          grants.  This budget proposal was adopted by the Budget 
          Conference Committee, but to-date has not been approved by 
          the full Legislature.
          
          Proposed Law:  As part of the Governor's Budget, this 
          budget trailer bill was proposed to provide DMV additional 
          administrative flexibility as the budget is deliberated and 
          the VLF rate is set for 2011-12.   With these 
          administrative flexibilities, DMV will be able to avoid 
          erroneous billing, multiple billing, or other confusion.  

          This bill includes the following provisions:

          1.Requires the DMV to make changes to its procedures 
            related to car registration for a limited period ending 
            January 1, 2012.  

          2.Suspends the existing statutory requirement that requires 
            notification of registration renewal 60-days prior to the 
            payment due date.

          3.Requires DMV to waive late payment penalties, for 
            payments received within 30 days after the due date.   

          4.Delays vehicle registration expiration enforcement to 
            instead begin on the first day of the second month after 
            the vehicle's registration due date.

          5.Prohibits any early payment of car registration and VLF 
            until the bill is mailed by the DMV. 

          Fiscal Effect:  No budget augmentation is associated with 
          this bill; however, if this bill is not enacted and future 
          legislation extends the current VLF rate, the DMV could 
          incur additional cost from double-billing and additional 
          programming costs.  This bill appropriates $1,000 from the 
          General Fund to the DMV to comply with the requirement of 
          Proposition 25 for a budget trailer bill.

          Support:   Unknown

          Opposed:  Unknown
                                       -2- 











          Comments:  The Administration indicates this proposal 
          represents the best option for car owners to avoid 
          erroneous billing, double billing, or other confusion.  All 
          the provisions of this bill are temporary, and the 
          current-law provisions for car registration would be 
          re-established on January 1, 2012.    




































                                       -3-