BILL ANALYSIS Ó
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 94|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Bill No: SB 94
Author: Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee
Amended: 4/15/11
Vote: 21
SENATE VOTES NOT RELEVANT
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 52-22, 04/28/11 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT : Vehicle License Fee Law: vehicle registration
SOURCE : Author
DIGEST : This bill requires the Department of Motor
Vehicles (DMV) to reduce the time between the mailing of a
car registration bill and the due date of the bill.
Assembly Amendments delete the prior Senate version of the
bill expressing the intent of the Legislature to enact
statutory changes relating to the Budget Act of 2011, and
place current language concerning vehicle license fees.
ANALYSIS : The DMV collects fees annually from the owners
of motor vehicles for registration that support the
operation of the DMV and the California Highway Patrol,
among other departments. As part of the vehicle
registration collection, the DMV also collects the Vehicle
License Fee (VLF) which is an in-lieu local property tax
based on the value of the vehicle. The VLF rate was set at
2.0 percent of a vehicle's value for a 50-year period
CONTINUED
SB 94
Page
2
ending in 1998. The VLF rate was reduced over time to a
new base rate of 0.65 percent, and the State General Fund
backfills revenue loss to local governments of
approximately $6 billion annually. Legislation enacted in
2009 (AB X3 3, Chapter 18), increased the VLF rate to 1.15
percent for a period ending June 30, 2011, after which the
rate returns to 0.65 percent. The temporary rate increase
provides approximately $1.4 billion to the State General
Fund, including about $500 million to support local law
enforcement programs.
Current law directs DMV in the administration of vehicle
registration. Among other requirements, the DMV is
directed to bill vehicle owners at least 60-days in advance
of the payment due date for registration and the VLF.
The Governor's January Budget proposed to maintain the
current 1.15 percent VLF rate for an additional five-year
period to support his state-local realignment proposal.
Within the realignment proposal is the continuation of
about $500 million in funding for local law enforcement
grants. This budget proposal was adopted by the Budget
Conference Committee, but to-date has not been approved by
the full Legislature.
As part of the Governor's Budget, this budget trailer bill
was proposed to provide DMV additional administrative
flexibility as the budget is deliberated and the VLF rate
is set for 2011-12. With these administrative
flexibilities, DMV will be able to avoid erroneous billing,
multiple billing, or other confusion.
This bill includes the following provisions:
1.Requires the DMV to make changes to its procedures
related to car registration for a limited period ending
January 1, 2012.
2.Suspends the existing statutory requirement that requires
notification of registration renewal 60-days prior to the
payment due date.
3.Requires DMV to waive late payment penalties, for
payments received within 30 days after the due date.
CONTINUED
SB 94
Page
3
4.Delays vehicle registration expiration enforcement to
instead begin on the first day of the second month after
the vehicle's registration due date.
5.Prohibits any early payment of car registration and VLF
until the bill is mailed by the DMV.
Comments
The Administration indicates this proposal represents the
best option for car owners to avoid erroneous billing,
double billing, or other confusion. All the provisions of
this bill are temporary, and the current-law provisions for
car registration would be re-established on January 1,
2012.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: Yes Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: No
No budget augmentation is associated with this bill;
however, if this bill is not enacted and future legislation
extends the current VLF rate, the DMV could incur
additional cost from double-billing and additional
programming costs. This bill appropriates $1,000 from the
General Fund to the DMV to comply with the requirement of
Proposition 25 for a budget trailer bill.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR :
AYES: Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Block,
Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan,
Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo,
Chesbro, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes,
Furutani, Galgiani, Gatto, Gordon, Hall, Hayashi, Roger
Hernández, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Lara, Bonnie
Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Perea, V.
Manuel Pérez, Portantino, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson,
Torres, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez
NOES: Achadjian, Conway, Cook, Donnelly, Garrick, Grove,
Hagman, Halderman, Harkey, Jeffries, Jones, Knight,
Logue, Mansoor, Miller, Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen,
Norby, Silva, Valadao, Wagner
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bill Berryhill, Fletcher, Gorell, Olsen,
CONTINUED
SB 94
Page
4
Smyth, Vacancy
DLW:nl 5/2/11 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: NONE RECEIVED
**** END ****
CONTINUED