BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 126
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 126 (Steinberg)
          As Introduced  January 27, 2011
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :39-0  
           
           TRANSPORTATION      14-0        BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS     9-0  
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Bonnie Lowenthal,         |Ayes:|Hayashi, Bill Berryhill,  |
          |     |Jeffries, Achadjian,      |     |Allen, Butler, Eng,       |
          |     |Blumenfield, Bonilla,     |     |Hagman, Hill, Ma, Smith   |
          |     |Buchanan, Eng, Furutani,  |     |                          |
          |     |Galgiani, Logue, Miller,  |     |                          |
          |     |Norby, Portantino,        |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio                   |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      16-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Harkey,          |     |                          |
          |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |     |                          |
          |     |Davis, Donnelly,          |     |                          |
          |     |Dickinson, Hall, Hill,    |     |                          |
          |     |Lara, Nielsen, Norby,     |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Codifies the process by which the California 
          Transportation Commission (CTC) is to adopt guidelines.  
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Makes legislative findings and declarations regarding the need 
            to ensure that CTC's process for adopting program guidelines 
            is understandable, predictable, and transparent and provides 
            ample opportunity for public review and comment on proposed 
            guidelines.  

          2)Provides, notwithstanding any other provision, in instances 








                                                                  SB 126
                                                                  Page  2


            where CTC adopts guidelines, the guidelines will be exempt 
            from rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act 
            (APA).  

          3)Sets forth a process governing CTC's adoption of guidelines 
            after January 1, 2012, (except for guidelines adopted to 
            implement the State Transportation Improvement Program) as 
            follows:  

             a)   CTC's legal counsel is required to review the proposed 
               guidelines for necessity, authority, clarity, consistency, 
               reference, and redundancy and recommend any changes to CTC 
               commissioners.  Comments and recommendations made by legal 
               counsel will be subject to attorney-client privilege, 
               unless otherwise waived.  The CTC Executive Director is 
               required to distribute the recommendations and 
               communications with legal counsel to all commissioners;  

             b)   Program or policy guidelines are to be first presented 
               at a CTC hearing for purposes of receiving public comment;  


             c)   Final proposed guidelines will be presented at a CTC 
               hearing;  

             d)   At least 45 days prior to the hearing, copies of the 
               proposed guidelines must be distributed and be made 
               available in electronic format;  

             e)   Proposed guidelines must include a notice of the right 
               of the public comment on the guidelines;  

             f)   Following the proposed guideline review process, CTC 
               staff will summarize all comments and explain any changes 
               to the guidelines in response to comments made;

             g)   Staff recommendations and summary must be made public 15 
               days prior to a regular CTC hearing; and, 

             h)   Guidelines must be adopted by a majority of the 
               commission membership.  

          4)Requires CTC to maintain complete files on guideline adoption 
            proceedings, including a summary of each objection or 








                                                                  SB 126
                                                                  Page  3


            recommendation made and an explanation of how the proposed 
            guidelines were changed to accommodate each objection or 
            recommendation, or the reason no change was made.  

          5)Requires CTC to include in its annual report to the 
            Legislature an accounting of its activities related to 
            guideline adoption during the prior year.  
           
          EXISTING LAW  :

          6)Establishes CTC and prescribes its membership and 
            responsibilities, including advising and assisting the 
            Secretary of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency 
            and the Legislature in formulating and evaluating state 
            policies and plans for transportation programs in the state.  

          7)Directs, in various provisions, CTC to establish guidelines to 
            implement specific programs.  

          8)Sets forth the APA and vests with the Office of Administrative 
            Law (OAL) the responsibility for an orderly review of adopted 
            regulations.  

          9)Prohibits any state agency from issuing utilizing, enforcing, 
            or attempting to enforce any "guideline, criterion, bulletin, 
            manual, instruction, order, standard of general application, 
            or other rule."  

          10)Excludes from provisions of the APA any regulation that 
            relates only to the internal management of a state agency.  

          11)Defines "regulation" to mean "every rule, regulation, order, 
            or standard of general application or the amendment, 
            supplement, or revision of any rule, regulation, order, or 
            standard adopted by any state agency to implement, interpret, 
            or make specific the law enforced or administered by it, or to 
            govern its procedure."  

          12)Sets forth procedures to be followed by APA for promulgating 
            regulations with timeframes similar to those set forth in this 
            bill.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee, absorbable costs to the CTC, which indicates that the 








                                                                  SB 126
                                                                  Page  4


          bill's requirements are generally in line with current practice. 
           

           COMMENTS  :  The author introduced this bill because he believes 
          that, on some occasions, the CTC's process for guideline 
          adoption lacked transparency and has not provided the public 
          with ample opportunity to fully review and comment on items at 
          issue in the proposed guidelines.  This bill would codify a 
          process whereby CTC would adopt program guidelines but it would 
          do so in a way that avoids the often-cumbersome process by which 
          regulations are promulgated via the OAL.  

          Related legislation:  SB 1348 (Steinberg) of 2010, was identical 
          to this bill.  It passed the Legislature unanimously but was 
          vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger.  In his veto message, the 
          Governor stated that bill was unnecessary because it would have 
          established a formal process that is very similar to the process 
          already used by the CTC.  

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :   Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 


                                                                FN: 0001766