BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 222 Page 1 SENATE THIRD READING SB 222 (Alquist) As Amended September 2, 2011 Majority vote SENATE VOTE :Vote not relevant HEALTH APPROPRIATIONS (vote not relevant) (vote not relevant) SUMMARY : Requires policies in the individual health insurance market to provide coverage for maternity services. Specifically, this bill : 1)Requires every individual health insurance policy to provide coverage for maternity services for all insureds covered under the policy on or before July 1, 2012. 2)Defines "maternity services" to include prenatal care, ambulatory care maternity services, involuntary complications of pregnancy, neonatal care, and inpatient hospital maternity care, including labor and delivery and postpartum care. 3)Requires the definition of "maternity services" from 2) above to remain in effect until federal regulations and guidance issued according to the federal health reform law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), define the scope of benefits to be provided under the maternity benefit requirement and at that time the PPACA definition is to apply. 4)Exempts from the provisions of this bill specialized health insurance, Medicare supplement insurance, short-term limited duration health insurance, Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services-supplement insurance, or TRI-CARE supplemental insurance, or hospital indemnity, accident-only, or specified disease insurance. 5)Makes the following findings and declarations: a) Health care service plans (health plans) are required by the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (Knox-Keene) to provide maternity services as a basic health care benefit; SB 222 Page 2 b) Existing law does not require health insurers to provide designated basic health care services and, therefore, they are not required to provide coverage for maternity services; and, c) It is essential to clarify that all health coverage made available to California consumers, whether issued by health plans regulated by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) or disability insurers who sell health insurance regulated by the Department of Insurance (CDI), must include maternity services. 6)Requires that the provisions of this bill become inoperative only if Assembly Bill 210 (Roger Hernández) of the 2011-12 Regular Session is also enacted and takes effect. EXISTING FEDERAL LAW : 1)Requires employers, under the Federal Civil Rights Act, that offer health insurance, and have 15 or more employees, to cover maternity services benefits at the same level as other health care benefits. 2)Defines, under PPACA, a list of "essential health benefits package," including maternal and newborn care, which health insurance coverage and group health plans must provide, beginning in 2014. EXISTING STATE LAW : 1)Provides for the regulation of health plans by DMHC under Knox-Keene and for the regulation of health insurers by CDI under the Insurance Code. 2)Requires health plans under Knox-Keene to cover a number of basic health care services and permits DMHC to define the scope of the services and to exempt plans from the requirement for good cause. 3)Provides, under Knox-Keene, that "basic health care services" include: a) physician services, including consultation and referral; b) hospital inpatient services and ambulatory care services; c) diagnostic laboratory and diagnostic and therapeutic radiological services; d) home health services; e) preventive health services; f) emergency health care services, including ambulance and ambulance transport services and SB 222 Page 3 out-of-area coverage; and, g) hospice care. 4)Requires, under Knox-Keene, health plans to provide all medically necessary basic health care services, including maternity services necessary to prevent serious deterioration of the health of the enrollee or the enrollee's fetus, and preventive health care services, specifically including prenatal care. 5)Prohibits health plans and health insurers from issuing contracts and policies that contain a copayment or deductible for inpatient hospital or ambulatory care maternity services that exceed the most common amount charged for the same type of care and services provided for other covered medical conditions. 6)Prohibits health plans and health insurers providing maternity benefits for a person covered continuously from conception from attaching any exclusions, reductions, or limitations to coverage for involuntary complications of pregnancy unless those provisions apply to all of the benefits paid by the plan or insurer. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis of SB 155 (Evans) which contained similar provisions, this bill will result in the following costs: 1)According to the California Health Benefits Review Program, no direct state fiscal impact for publicly supported health coverage provided through Medi-Cal, California Public Employees' Retirement System, or Healthy Families/Access for Infants and Mothers. 2) Increased premium costs in the individual insurance market of approximately $110 million. Increased premium costs are estimated to be offset by a reduction in out-of-pocket costs for women who would otherwise pay for a variety of services not covered by insurance in the absence of this mandate. 3)Federal regulations implementing PPACA may reduce the fiscal impact of this bill in future years. PPACA requires maternity services to be covered as a basic benefit in state-run health insurance exchanges that will provide health coverage to millions of individuals. SB 222 Page 4 COMMENTS : According to the author, current law requires health plans and group insurers to include maternity services, but individually marketed plans are not subject to that requirement. The author maintains that as a result, cheaper "maternity-free" policies have increased. The author also asserts that the percentage of policies containing maternity coverage has dropped from 82% in 2004 to only 19% in 2009, leaving a growing number of women priced out of the insurance market. The author contends that, as employer-sponsored coverage declines, insurance companies are increasingly targeting the young and uninsured with products that do not include maternity services, even though 25% of these individuals are women of childbearing age. The author maintains that these types of products delay and restrict access to prenatal care, which can lead to serious health complications for both the mother and the newborn, and force more women into state-funded programs, such as Medi-Cal or Access for Infants and Mothers. Numerous studies have shown that prenatal care pays for itself by helping to minimize the prevalence and severity of low- and very low-birth weight babies. A 2004 study in the Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing evaluated the effects of augmented prenatal care on women at high risk for having a low-birth weight baby who were enrolled in a special program that provided basic prenatal care, prenatal education, and case management. The program saved about $13,962 per single low-birth weight birth prevented, and, after program costs were considered, the return on investment equaled 37%; for every dollar invested in the program $1.37 was saved. In addition, a March of Dimes (MoD) report indicated that hospital charges for premature, low-birth weight infants totaled $37.7 billion nationally in 2003. The MoD report stated that premature birth was among the most common, serious, and costly problems facing infants in the U.S. and is responsible for about half of all infant hospitalizations. Analysis Prepared by : Tanya Robinson-Taylor / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 FN: 0002577 SB 222 Page 5