BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  SB 264
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  June 14, 2011

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
                                  Mike Feuer, Chair
                      SB 264 (Correa) - As Amended:  May 3, 2011

                    PROPOSED CONSENT (As Proposed to be Amended)

           SENATE VOTE  :  39-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  recreational activities: skateboard parks

           KEY ISSUE  :  SHOULD THE QUALIFIED IMMUNITY CURRENTLY GRANTED TO 
          local public agencies who operate skateboard parks BE MADE 
          PERMANENT? 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal.

                                      SYNOPSIS

          This non-controversial bill seeks to make permanent the 
          qualified immunity already provided to local public agencies 
          that operate skateboard parks.  Additionally, this bill would 
          amend the reporting requirements for the local agencies, 
          requiring them to file an annual report to both the Senate and 
          Assembly Judiciary Committees directly rather than through the 
          Judicial Council as currently is the law.  The bill maintains 
          the current requirements that skateboard parks require riders to 
          wear a helmet, knee pads and elbow pads in order to qualify for 
          the immunity.  The author notes that extending the qualification 
          of skateboarding as a "hazardous recreational activity" is 
          necessary for the ongoing operation of municipal skate parks.  
          This classification offers strong liability protection for a 
          sport that can be dangerous if performed irresponsibility.  By 
          limiting liability, the author hopes to maintain this form of 
          recreation and exercise for California youth into the future.  
          This bill is supported by local government groups, insurance 
          providers and outdoor recreation groups and has no known 
          opposition.

           SUMMARY  :  Makes permanent qualified immunity for skateboard park 
          operators and amends the injury reporting requirements for local 
          agencies that operate skateboard parks.  Specifically,  this 
          bill  :

          1)Indefinitely extends the classification of skateboarding as a 







                                                                  SB 264
                                                                  Page  2

            "hazardous recreational activity" past its current January 1, 
            2012 sunset date, thereby extending local agencies qualified 
            immunity for injuries resulting from skateboarding at their 
            park.

          2)Amends the current reporting requirement (of injuries and 
            lawsuits associated with skateboard parks) to mandate annual 
            reports be provided to the Senate and Assembly Judiciary 
            Committees directly and not via the Judicial Council.

          3)Maintains the existing safety regulations requiring all 
            skateboard parks to require riders to wear a helmet, knee pads 
            and elbow pads.


           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Shields public entities and public employees from liability to 
            any person participating in a hazardous recreational activity, 
            including voluntary spectators who recognized the substantial 
            risk of injury due to the activity.  Public entities and 
            public employees remain liable for injuries proximately caused 
            by the negligent failure of the public entity or public 
            employee to properly construct or maintain in good repair any 
            structure, recreational equipment or machinery, or substantial 
            work of improvement.  (Government Code Section 831.7.)

          2)Defines "hazardous recreational activity" as a recreational 
            activity conducted on the property of a public entity that 
            creates a substantial risk of injury to a participant or 
            spectator.  Sample hazardous recreational activities include 
            hang gliding, kayaking, motorized vehicle racing, pistol and 
            rifle shooting, rock climbing, racketeering, spelunking, sky 
            diving, sport parachuting, and paragliding.  (Government Code 
            Section 831.7.)

          3)Prohibits an operator of a skateboard park from permitting any 
            person to ride a skateboard therein, unless that person is 
            wearing a helmet, elbow pads, and knee pads.  Facilities owned 
            or operated by a local public agency, that are designed for 
            recreational skateboard use and unsupervised, may comply with 
            that requirement by: (1) adopting an ordinance requiring 
            anyone riding a skateboard at the facility to wear a helmet, 
            elbow pads, and knee pads; and (2) posting signs that inform 
            skateboarders that they must wear those items and that failing 
            to do so will subject them to a citation.  (Health & Safety 







                                                                  SB 264
                                                                  Page  3

            Code Section 115800.)

          4)Defines skateboarding as a "hazardous recreational activity" 
            if the person skateboarding is at least 12 years old, the 
            skateboarding activity causing injury was a stunt, trick, or 
            luge skateboarding, and the injury occurred on public property 
            requiring a helmet, elbow pads, and knee pads.  Existing law 
            also mandates that no operator of a skateboard park permit a 
            person to skateboard within that park, unless that person 
            wears a helmet, elbow pads, and knee pads.  (Health & Safety 
            Code Section 115800.)

          5)Requires local public agencies to maintain a record of all 
            known or reported injuries incurred by a skateboarder in a 
            public skateboard park or facility.  That agency must also 
            maintain a record of all claims, paid and not paid, including 
            any lawsuits and their results, arising from those incidents 
            that were filed against the public agency.  (Health & Safety 
            Code Section 115800(d)(4).)  
              
           6)Requires the above records to be filed with the Judicial 
            Council, which shall submit a report to the Legislature on or 
            before March 31, 2011, on the incidences of injuries incurred, 
            claims asserted, and the results of any lawsuit filed by 
            persons while skateboarding in public skateboard parks or 
            facilities.  (Health & Safety Code Section 115800(d)(4).)

          7)Repeals the inclusion of skateboarding as a "hazardous 
            recreational activity" on January 1, 2012.  
           
           COMMENTS  :  This bill seeks to make permanent the qualified 
          immunity already provided to local public agencies that operate 
          skateboard parks for injuries that occur as the result of a 
          stunt, trick, or other skateboarding activity.  The author 
          states:
               
               California law (HSC �115800) currently deems skateboarding 
               a hazardous recreational activity (where certain 
               circumstances are met) within the meaning of Section 831.7 
               of the Government Code.  This provision in current law 
               reduces liability for skateboard accidents, making it 
               feasible for cities to build skateboard parks.  This 
               particular provision will sunset on January 1, 2012. 
               (Related legislation: SB 1179 (Morrow 2006).
                
                SB 264 would enable public entities to maintain their 







                                                                 SB 264
                                                                  Page  4

               current skateboard parks with less risk of liability.  This 
               may result in greater recreational opportunities for the 
               citizens of California through the construction of new 
               skateboard parks and sport tournament promotion.  The 
               enactment of this measure could also have a positive 
               immediate impact in local economies.

          The qualified immunity provisions of existing law were made 
          effective on January 1, 1998 to address the concerns of local 
          governments who feared potentially huge liability resulting from 
          opening and operating local skate parks.  In order to give 
          teenagers and young adults a safe place to skateboard and 
          prevent them from trespassing onto private property to 
          skateboard, the Legislature granted the conditional immunity to 
          encourage local entities to build more skateboard facilities 
          throughout the state.  Without further legislation this immunity 
          is set to expire on January 1, 2012.  As the bill's sponsor, the 
          City of Garden Grove, noted without action by the Legislature "a 
          majority of public entities?could be forced to close existing 
          skateboard parks because they do not have funds to staff and 
          monitor these facilities commensurate with the increased 
          liability."

          Because these parks promote physical activity and safe 
          recreational venues for teenagers and young adults local 
          agencies seek a long term solution to address the liability risk 
          before the January 1, 2012 sunset date to ensure they can keep 
          skateboard facilities open.  Like many other sunset provisions 
          enacted by the Legislature, the skateboard liability sunset 
          provided for injury reporting requirements so the Legislature 
          can accurately evaluate the merits of the continuing immunity 
          for local agencies that operate skateboard parks.

          In fulfilling the sunset's reporting requirement the Judicial 
          Council filed a report on March 24, 2011 evaluating information 
          received from 34 public agencies.  The report contained data 
          regarding all injuries and ensuing lawsuits stemming from 
          accidents at skateboard parks.  The report found that between 
          2002 and 2010, 792 injuries were reported at skate parks.  The 
          most common injuries were facial lacerations with arm, head and 
          ankle injuries also being prevalent.  The report found that of 
          the 792 injuries disclosed, none resulted in claims or lawsuits 
          being filed against the local agency operating the park.  The 
          lack of lawsuits has allowed local agencies to operate skate 
          parks without fear of budget crippling tort suits.








                                                                  SB 264
                                                                  Page  5

           Same Reports, New Readers:   The presently expiring immunity 
          provisions implemented reporting requirements to ensure that the 
          law could be assessed over time to ensure the immunity 
          provisions were not barring legitimate law suits and that 
          skateboard parks were being properly maintained.  This bill was 
          amended to switch the reporting requirement from the Judicial 
          Council to the Senate and Assembly Judiciary Committees for 
          future disclosure to ensure that any suits that would be barred 
          by the permanent extension of immunity would immediately come to 
          the attention of the Legislature.  

           Benefits of Continued Immunity for Skate Parks:   The continuance 
          of qualified immunity for public agencies operating skate parks 
          should permit the expansion of these recreational venues.  The 
          biggest potential cost associated with skate parks stems from 
          the risk of liability attached with the sport.  By limiting that 
          liability, the opportunity for growth in the parks is expanded.  
          The parks have been widely successful and continue to grow in 
          popularity.  Presently 100 new parks are under development 
          statewide.  As the author notes, expansion of these recreational 
          facilities is contingent on localities maintaining protection 
          from liability.  This bill extends that protection and 
          encourages the further expansion of these facilities widely 
          enjoyed by young adults.

           Author's Technical Amendment:   The author prudently proposes the 
          following amendment to ensure all references to the former 
          grandfather date are removed:

               -      On page 3 line 28 remove "and before January 1, 
                 2012"

           Prior/ Pending Legislation  :  AB 1296 (Morrow-1997): Created the 
          qualified immunity provisions for skate parks and implemented 
          the reporting and safety equipment requirements.

          SB 994 (Morrow-2002): Extended the sunset provision originally 
          created in AB 1296.

          SB 1179 (Morrow-2006): Further extended the sunset provisions. 
          Set them to expire on January 1, 2012 which has made the present 
          extension necessary.

          AB 874 (Saldana-2010): Attempted to remove the elbow and knee 
          pad requirement established in AB 1296.  Was referred to the 
          Senate Judiciary Committee where it was never heard.







                                                                  SB 264
                                                                  Page  6


           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support
           
          City of Garden Grove (sponsor)
          California Association of Joint Powers Association
          California Park & Recreation Society
          CSAC Excess Insurance Authority
           
            Opposition 

           None on file


           Analysis Prepared by  :   Drew Liebert  & Nick Liedtke / JUD. / 
          (916) 319-2334