BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 290|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 290
          Author:   Correa (D)
          Amended:  As introduced
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE  :  9-0, 3/29/11
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Gaines, Harman, Huff, Kehoe, Lowenthal, 
            Pavley, Rubio, Simitian

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8


           SUBJECT  :    Neighborhood electric vehicles

           SOURCE  :     Rancho Mission Viejo


           DIGEST  :    This bill extends, from January 1, 2013 until 
          January 1, 2017, the authority of Orange County to 
          establish a neighborhood electric vehicle transportation 
          plan for the Ranch Plan Planned Community.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law defines a "low-speed vehicle" as 
          a motor vehicle that is four-wheeled; can attain a speed of 
          no more than 25 MPH on a paved, level surface; and has a 
          gross vehicle weight rating of less than 3,000 pounds.  
          Low-speed vehicles are also known as neighborhood electric 
          vehicles (NEVs).  NEVs meet federal motor vehicle safety 
          standards, and one must possess a valid California driver's 
          license to operate an NEV on public streets.

          Existing law generally prohibits NEVs from being operated 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 290
                                                                Page 
          2

          on any roadway with a speed limit in excess of 35 MPH, but 
          a number of bills have provided exceptions for several 
          communities to run pilot projects, provided that the 
          following conditions are met:

          1. Each local government establishes a "neighborhood 
             electric vehicle transportation plan" for its 
             jurisdiction or some part of it.  Existing law puts 
             numerous requirements on the adoption of the plan, 
             including consultation with local law enforcement and 
             transportation planning officials.  The plan must 
             accommodate the travel of NEVs by identifying routes and 
             providing for NEV facilities (separate lanes, trails, 
             street crossings, parking, charging stations, etc.), and 
             it may allow NEVs on streets with speed limits over 35 
             MPH only where dedicated lanes are provided for NEVs. 

          2. Each jurisdiction works with the Department of 
             Transportation (Caltrans) to establish uniform 
             specifications and symbols for signs, traffic control 
             devices, and rights-of-way designation in the plan areas 
             and have Caltrans approval in any instance where an NEV 
             route in the plan will cross or use a state highway.

          3. If a jurisdiction adopts a NEV transportation plan, it 
             reports to the Legislature on the plan, its 
             effectiveness, and its impact on traffic flows and 
             safety, and the jurisdiction makes a recommendation to 
             the Legislature on extending the sunset date or 
             expanding the authorization for NEV transportation plans 
             statewide.  These reports are due to the Legislature 
             about a year before the jurisdiction's NEV plan 
             authority sunsets.

          Communities statutorily authorized to adopt NEV plans are:

            Lincoln and Rocklin  .  AB 2353 (Leslie), Chapter 422, 
            Statutes of 2004, authorized the NEV transportation plan 
            pilot projects until January 1, 2009, for the cities of 
            Lincoln and Rocklin, and AB 2963 (Gaines), Chapter 199, 
            Statutes of 2008, extended the sunset date on the Lincoln 
            and Rocklin pilot projects until January 1, 2012. 

            Amador County and the cities of Jackson, Sutter Creek, 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 290
                                                                Page 
          3

            and Amador City  .  AB 584 (Huber), Chapter 437, Statutes 
            of 2010, allows until 2016, the County of Amador and the 
            cities of Jackson, Amador City, and Sutter Creek to 
            establish a neighborhood electric vehicle transportation 
            plan or plans.

            Fresno  .  AB 1781 (Villines), Chapter 452, Statutes of 
            2010, authorizes until 2016 the City of Fresno to 
            establish a NEV plan.

            Ranch Plan Planned Community in Orange County  .  SB 956 
            (Correa), Chapter 442, Statutes of 2007, authorizes 
            Orange County to establish a NEV transportation plan for 
            Ranch Plan Planned Community under essentially the same 
            criteria as the Lincoln and Rocklin pilot projects, 
            except with a sunset date of January 1, 2013.

          This bill extends the sunset date on the NEV transportation 
          plan authority in Orange County to January 1, 2017, and 
          requires that the county submit its report to the 
          Legislature by November 1, 2015.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  Yes

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  4/12/11)

          Rancho Mission Viejo (source)


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author's office states that 
          this bill, authorizing the Ranch Plan Planned Community NEV 
          plan, passed in 2007 at the peak of the real estate market. 
           The real estate market subsequently collapsed and new 
          housing starts statewide declined to the lowest numbers on 
          record.  The author's office reports that, as a result, the 
          Ranch Plan  development has just recently begun mass 
          grading and that the current development schedule calls for 
          the first neighborhoods and homes to be built in 2012, with 
          the first residents arriving in early 2013.

          The developer of Ranch Plan Planned Community, who is the 
          sponsor of this bill and of SB 956 in 2007, remains 
          committed to building a complete system of NEV trails 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 290
                                                                Page 
          4

          andfacilities throughout the new community to provide an 
          environmentally beneficial alternative to automobiles, but 
          an extension in the report and sunset dates is required to 
          do so.  The proposed 2015 report and 2017 sunset dates will 
          provide sufficient NEV transportation experience for NEV 
          users, transportation managers, and law enforcement 
          officials to provide meaningful information in a report to 
          the Legislature.  The author's office further notes that 
          the information in this report should differ from some 
          other NEV transportation plans because NEVs in this 
          instance are being incorporated into a new community trail 
          system rather than being added to existing roads and 
          trails. 


          RJG:mw  4/12/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****
          
























                                                           CONTINUED