BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 326 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 25, 2011 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Felipe Fuentes, Chair SB 326 (Yee) - As Amended: August 22, 2011 Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:10-0 (Consent) Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: SUMMARY This bill requires the Judicial Council to adopt a rule of court regarding access to court records. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires the Judicial Council, to adopt, within 18 months, a rule of court requiring courts to provide same-day public access to "case-initiating civil and criminal court records," as defined, for viewing at the courthouse. 2)Stipulates that, to the extent possible, the adopted rule provide same-day access for records received within 30 minutes of the daily court closing, and requires that records be made available within 60 minutes after the court opens for the next day. 3)Stipulates that the rules shall allow the court to charge a nominal fee for providing a copy of records requested at the courthouse. FISCAL EFFECT In the courts most recent statistical report, for 2008-09, court filings that would be subject, upon request, to the same-day access under this bill totaled 1.9 million (about 20% of all filings). Depending on the volume of requests for same-day access, the courts could incur costs of up to several million annually for additional staff to meet the bill's requirements. The Judicial Council indicates that most courts could not comply with these requirements using current court resources without diverting staff from other mandated duties. Moreover, the SB 326 Page 2 2011-12 Budget Act includes $350 million in General Fund reductions to court operations, further exacerbating this situation. COMMENTS 1)Purpose . This bill is co-sponsored by Californians Aware, Courthouse News Service, and the First Amendment Coalition. Although the public has a well-founded right of access to court records, the author reports increasing delays in public access to court records, with some courts apparently delaying public access for as much as several weeks for newly filed complaints. The prior version of the bill would have applied the rule of court for same-day access to those courts that have fully implemented the California Case Management System (CCMS). Due to concerns over the status and implementation of CCMS in light of court fiscal constraints, the most recent author's amendments require the same-day access to the records at all courts if requested at the courthouse, and allow courts to charge a fee for this service. 2)Opposition . The Judicial Council is opposed for the reasons discussed in the fiscal effect above. Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081