BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY Senator Loni Hancock, Chair S 2011-2012 Regular Session B 4 2 5 SB 425 (Calderon) As Amended March 21, 2011 Hearing date: April 5, 2011 Penal Code MK:dl CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: FIGHTING HISTORY Source: The Humane Society of the United States Prior Legislation: SB 318 (Calderon) - Chapter 302, Stats. 2009 SB 1775 (Calderon) - Failed in Senate Public Safety 2008 SB 1349 (Soto) - Chapter 430, Stats. 2006 SB 156 (Soto) - Moved to Assembly Inactive File then Amended to different subject 2005-2006. SB 732 (Soto) - Chapter 256, Stats. 2003 SB 196 (Knight) - Chapter 422, Stats. 1997 SB 1587 (Roberti) - 1989, not chaptered Support: American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; California Police Chiefs Association; Paw PAC; California Animal Control Directors Association; Animal Place Opposition:Association for the Preservation of Gamefowl; A number of individuals KEY ISSUES (More) SB 425 (Calderon) PageB SHOULD MINIMUM FINES BE CREATED FOR PEOPLE CONVICTED OF COCKFIGHTING AND DOG FIGHTING RELATED CRIMES? (CONTINUED) SHOULD THE FINE FOR A MINOR UNDER 16 YEARS OF AGE ATTENDING A COCKFIGHT OR BEING ADMITTED TO A COCKFIGHT BE INCREASED? SHOULD PROPERTY ACQUIRED THROUGH COCKFIGHTING BE SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE? PURPOSE The purpose of this bill is to provide for minimum fines for specified dog fighting and cockfighting violations and to allow for forfeiture of property acquired through cockfighting. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding $100 or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than 25 days for any minor under the age of 16 years to visit or attend any prizefight, cockfight or place where any prizefight or cockfight is advertised and for any owner, lessee or proprietor of any place where any prizefight or cockfight is advertised to admit any minor or to sell or five to any such minor a ticket to a place where a prizefight or cockfight is advertised to take place. (Penal Code § 310) This bill provides that any minor under 16 years of age who visit or attends any cockfight or place where any cockfight is advertised to take place, and any owner lessee, or proprietor, or the agent of any owner, lessee or proprietor of any place where any cockfight is advertised or represented to take place who admits any minor to a place where any cockfight is advertised or represented to take place or who admits, sells, or gives to any minor a ticket or other paper by which that (More) SB 425 (Calderon) PageC minor may be admitted to a place where a cockfight is advertised to take place, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not exceeding $500 or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than 25 days. Existing law provides that any person who does any of the following is guilty of a felony and is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months, 2 or 3 years or by a fine not exceeding $50,000: § Owns, possesses, keeps, or trains any dog, with the intent that the dog shall be engaged in an exhibition of fighting with another dog. § For amusement or gain, causes any dog to fight with another dog, or causes any dogs to injure each other. § Permits either of the above to be done on any premises under his or her charge or control, or aids, or abets that act. (Penal Code § 597.5 (a).) This bill provides for a minimum fine of $10,000 for a violation of Penal Code § 597.5(a) except in unusual circumstances where the interests of justice would be better served by imposition of a lesser sentence. Existing law provides that any person who is knowingly present, as a spectator, at any place, building, or tenement where preparations are being made for an exhibition of the fighting of dogs, with the intent to be present at those preparations, or is knowingly present at the exhibitions or at any other fighting or injuring with the intent to be present at that exhibition, fighting or injuring, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in county jail and/or a fine not to exceed $5,000. (Penal Code § 597.5 (b).) This bill provides for a minimum fine of $1,000 for a violation of Penal Code § 597.5(b). Existing law provides that any person, who for amusement or (More) SB 425 (Calderon) PageD gain, causes any bull, bear, or other animal, not including any dog, to fight with the like kind of animal or creature, or causes any animal, including any dog, to fight with a different kind of animal or creature, or with any human being; or who, for amusement or gain, worries or injures any bull, bear, dog, or other animal, or causes any bull, bear or other animal, not including any dog, to worry or injure each other; and any person who permits the same to be done on any premises under his or her charge or control; and any person who aids, abets, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail and/or a fine of $5000. (Penal Code § 597b(a).) This bill provides for a minimum fine of $1,000 for a violation of Penal Code § 597b(a).) Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to cause, for amusement or gain, an animal to fight a like or different animal. The penalty for a first offense is up to one year in county jail and/or a fine of $5,000. (Penal Code § 597b(b).) This bill provides for a minimum fine of $1,000 for a violation of Penal Code § 597b. Existing law provides that any person who is knowingly present as a spectator at any place, building, or tenement for an exhibition of animal fighting, or who is knowingly present where preparations are being made for animal fighting is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail and a fine up to $1,000. (Penal Code § 597c.) This bill provides that the penalty for a violation of Penal Code § 597c is imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed 6 months, or by a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $1,000 or by both imprisonment or fine. Existing law provides that it is a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail and/or a fine up to $1,000 for any person to tie or attach or fasten any live animal to any machine or device propelled by any power for the purpose of (More) SB 425 (Calderon) PageE causing such animal to be pursued by a dog or dogs. (Penal Code § 597h) This bill provides that the penalty for Penal Code § 597h shall be a fine of $2,500 and/or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months. Existing law provides that it is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in county jail and/or a fine up to $5,000 for any person to manufacture, buy, sell, barter, exchange or to have in his or her possession any of the implements commonly known as gaffs or slashers, or any other sharp implement designed to be attached in place of the natural spur of a gamecock or other fighting bird. This bill provides for a minimum fine of $1,000 for a violation of Penal Code § 597i. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for any person to own, possess, keep or train any bird or animal with the intent that it be used in an exhibition of fighting. The penalty for a first offense is up to one year in county jail and/or a fine of $5000. (Penal Code §597j(a).) This bill provides for a minimum fine of $1,000 for a violation of Penal Code § 597j(a). Existing law provides that second or subsequent violation of Penal Code Sections 597j is a misdemeanor with a penalty of up to one year in county jail and/or a fine up to $25,000. (Penal Code § 597j.) This bill provides a minimum fine of $10,000 for a second or subsequent violation of Penal Code § 597j. Existing law provides that the prosecuting agency in a criminal proceeding where a person has been charged with dog fighting may file a petition for forfeiture of any property interest, whether tangible or intangible, that was acquired through the commission of the crimes and sets forth procedures for such forfeiture. (More) SB 425 (Calderon) PageF (Penal Code § 598.1) This bill adds cockfighting to those provisions for which forfeiture may be sought. RECEIVERSHIP/OVERCROWDING CRISIS AGGRAVATION For the last several years, severe overcrowding in California's prisons has been the focus of evolving and expensive litigation. As these cases have progressed, prison conditions have continued to be assailed, and the scrutiny of the federal courts over California's prisons has intensified. On June 30, 2005, in a class action lawsuit filed four years earlier, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California established a Receivership to take control of the delivery of medical services to all California state prisoners confined by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR"). In December of 2006, plaintiffs in two federal lawsuits against CDCR sought a court-ordered limit on the prison population pursuant to the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act. On January 12, 2010, a three-judge federal panel issued an order requiring California to reduce its inmate population to 137.5 percent of design capacity -- a reduction at that time of roughly 40,000 inmates -- within two years. The court stayed implementation of its ruling pending the state's appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. On Monday, June 14, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the state's appeal of this order and, on Tuesday, November 30, 2010, the Court heard oral arguments. A decision is expected as early as this spring. In response to the unresolved prison capacity crisis, in early 2007 the Senate Committee on Public Safety began holding legislative proposals which could further exacerbate prison overcrowding through new or expanded felony prosecutions. This bill does not appear to aggravate the prison overcrowding (More) SB 425 (Calderon) PageG crisis described above. COMMENTS 1. Need for This Bill According to the author: Animal fighting-dogfighting and cockfighting remain pervasive, insidious, and dangerous threats to California communities. In spite of increased attention from media, law enforcement and the legislature, these underground organized criminal activities continue to thrive across urban, rural, coastal and inland, northern and southern California. (More) 2. Fines and Penalty Assessments in General Added to every fine imposed are approximately 280% in penalty assessments.<1> Thus, a $100 fine is really about $380; a $500 fine is $1,900; a $1,000 fine is $3,800; a $2,500 fine is $7,000; a $5,000 fine is $14,000; a $10,000 fine is $28,000; $25,000 fine is $70,000; and, a $50,000 fine is $140,000. In addition to fines a defendant also pays court ordered restitution to the victim. 3. Increased Fine for Minor at a Cockfight Under existing law the penalty for a minor under 16 years of age attending a prizefight or a cockfight, or selling a ticket or admitting a minor under 16 years of age to a prizefight or a cockfight is the same, up to 25 days in the county jail or a fine not exceeding $100 ($380 with penalty assessments). This bill makes the penalty for a minor under 16 years of age attending a cockfight or selling a ticket or admitting a minor under 16 years of age to a cockfight $500 ($1,900 with penalty assessments) or up to 25 days in the county jail. 4. Possessing and Training of Dogs for Fighting This bill creates a new minimum fine of $10,000 ($28,000 with penalty assessments) to the felony of possessing training or causing dogs to fight. The current maximum fine is $50,000 ($140,000 with penalty assessments) with penalty assessments. This bill does provide that an imposition of a lesser sentence can occur in "unusual circumstances" where the interests of justice would be better served. One concern with high minimum --------------------------- <1> Until the budget year 2002-2003, there was 170% in penalty assessments applied to every fine, the current penalty assessments are approximately 280% plus an additional $4 per fine. (See Penal Code § 1464; Penal Code § 1465.7; Penal Code § 1465.8 Government Code § 70372; Government Code § 7600.5 Government Code § 76000 et seq; Government Code § 76000.10; Government Code § 76104.6 ) (More) SB 425 (Calderon) PageI fines is that it may limit the amount of money a defendant has to pay restitution. In the case of dogs trained to fight, it is possible for the court to order restitution to care for the dogs who are the victims in the case. A court may be reluctant to order the maximum restitution if the person is already required to pay a high fine. 5. Additional Minimum Fines This bill creates minimum fines of $1,000 ($3,800 with penalty assessments) for being present at a dogfighting; causing any animal to fight for amusement or gain; causing a cock to fight for amusement or gain; being a spectator at a cockfight; owning implements of cockfighting; and possessing or training a cock to fight. This bill also increases the fine from $1,000 ($3,800 with penalty assessments) to $2,500 ($7,000) for tieing or attaching or fastening any live animal to a device propelled by any power for the purpose of causing that animal to be pursued by dogs. In addition this bill creates a minimum fine of $10,000 ($28,000 with penalty assessments) for a second conviction of owning or possessing any bird or animal for the purpose of fighting. The current maximum fine is $25,000 ($70,000 with penalty assessments). Are these minimum fines appropriate taking into consideration the penalty assessments and potential restitution? The courts currently have the discretion to order these fines, should the courts retain the discretion in determining the appropriate balance between fines and restitution? 6. Forfeiture In 2009, SB 318 (Calderon) created forfeiture procedures for property acquired through the commission of dog fighting. The property that can be forfeited includes personal and real property, profits, proceeds and instrumentalities acquired, accumulated or used by dogfighting participants, organizers, SB 425 (Calderon) PageJ transporters of animals and equipment, breeders and trainers of fighting dogs and persons who steal or illegally obtain dogs or other animals for fighting including bait and sparring animals. This bill extends these forfeiture provisions to cockfighting. ***************